Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte „hybride Kriege“ bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck

Bernhard Koch

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2016-2-109

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 97–145 THEMENSCHWERPUNKT 97–145
  - 97–103 Postmoderne Interventionen: In der Grauzone zwischen Begrenzung und Entgrenzung kollektiver Gewalt Hans-Georg Ehrhart Hans-Georg Ehrhart 97–103
  - 104–108 Chimäre statt Chamäleon: Probleme der begrifflichen Zähmung des hybriden Krieges Felix Wassermann Felix Wassermann 104–108
  - 109–113 Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte „hybride Kriege“ bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck Bernhard Koch Bernhard Koch 109–113
  - 114–120 Hybride Kriegführung und das „Center of Gravity“ der Entscheidung Johann Schmid Johann Schmid 114–120
  - 121–125 Die NATO und hybride Kriegführung Johannes Varwick, Aylin Matlé Johannes Varwick, Aylin Matlé 121–125
  - 126–133 Clausewitz und der Kampf um Anerkennung in hybriden Kriegen: Zur Motivation von IS Kämpfern Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Miriam Förstle Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Miriam Förstle 126–133
  - 134–140 Beyond Mere Terrorism: The Islamic State’s Authority as a Social Movement and as a Quasi-State Christoph Günther, Tom Kaden Christoph Günther, Tom Kaden 134–140
  - 141–145 Hybride Bedrohnung und Bevölkerungsschutz Dirk Freudenberg Dirk Freudenberg 141–145
- 146–156 FORUM 146–156
  - 146–150 „Wie wird Friede? “Zur Friedensethik von Dietrich Bonhoeffer Detlef Bald Detlef Bald 146–150
  - 151–156 Der Konflikt um die Ukraine: Was wir von Egon Bahr lernen können Ulrich Kuhn Ulrich Kuhn 151–156
- 157–157 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 157–157
- 158–164 BESPRECHUNGEN 158–164
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 109 - 113

Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte „hybride Kriege“ bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck

Autoren

Bernhard Koch

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2016-2-109
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

One of the main problems with ethical considerations on warfare is that ethics itself is often used as weapon in conflicts. Another problem is that the traditional distinction between a state of war and a state of peace increasingly loses its punch. Hybrid Warfare is an indicator for both of these. Present-day moral philosophical discussions try to circumvent these difficulties by applying a normative framework which is individualistic in its basic assumptions and does not principally distinguish between interpersonal violence and group violence. It also provides a good starting point for normative thinking about hybrid wars.

Abstract

One of the main problems with ethical considerations on warfare is that ethics itself is often used as weapon in conflicts. Another problem is that the traditional distinction between a state of war and a state of peace increasingly loses its punch. Hybrid Warfare is an indicator for both of these. Present-day moral philosophical discussions try to circumvent these difficulties by applying a normative framework which is individualistic in its basic assumptions and does not principally distinguish between interpersonal violence and group violence. It also provides a good starting point for normative thinking about hybrid wars.
Share