Jump to content
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa / Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa / Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–10
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–10
Details
11–32
Introduction
11–32
Mapping Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa: Historic Developments and Comparative Remarks
Anja Schoeller-Schletter
Anja Schoeller-Schletter
Details
1. Introduction: Mapping constitutional review – the project
Details
2. Overview of historic developments, legal traditions, and the models for constitutional review
Details
2.1. Historic ties, legal traditions and the models for constitutional review
Details
2.2. The trend to concentrated a posteriori constitutional review
Details
3. The rise of constitutional review as an instrument
Details
3.1. The limits of abstract, a priori, non-judicial constitutional review: From constitutional councils to constitutional courts
Details
3.2. Strong courts building tradition
Details
4. Constitutional review revisited
Details
4.1. New names, new procedures: Pending implementation
Details
4.2. More cases, more work: The challenge of filtering and accessibility
Details
4.3. Jurisdiction for comparative analysis
Details
5. Summary and outlook
Details
33–92
Part I: Constitutional Review and Judicial Independence
33–92
33–46
The Appointment of the Members of the Algerian Constitutional Council
Wissam Benyettou
Wissam Benyettou
33–46
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The procedure for the appointment of members of the Constitutional Council
Details
3. Eligibility criteria
Details
4. Profiles of members of the Constitutional Council
Details
5. Limited term of office
Details
6. The impact of the composition of the Constitutional Council on its decision-making process
Details
7. Controversies around members of the Constitutional Council
Details
8. The Constitutional Council in the middle of the Algerian political crisis
Details
9. Conclusion
Details
47–60
The Independence of Constitutional Judges: The Case of Jordan
Sufian Obeidat
Sufian Obeidat
47–60
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Constitutional context
Details
2.1. System of government and the executive
Details
2.2. The legislative
Details
2.3. The judiciary
Details
2.4. Recent amendments
Details
3. Political context
Details
3.1. An unaccountable monarch
Details
3.2. Legislative and political parties undermined
Details
3.3. An undermined judiciary
Details
4. History of constitutional review
Details
4.1. The High Tribunal
Details
4.2. Diffused constitutional review
Details
4.3. The Judicial Council
Details
5. The Constitutional Court
Details
5.1. Mode of nomination and appointment
Details
5.2. Term and removal
Details
6. Conclusion
Details
61–76
Guarantees and Challenges of Judicial Independence: The Constitutional Courts of Kuwait and Bahrain as Case Studies
Salma Waheedi
Salma Waheedi
61–76
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Kuwait
Details
2.1. The constitutional and legal framework
Details
2.2. Legal and institutional challenges
Details
3. Bahrain
Details
3.1. The constitutional and legal framework
Details
3.2. Legal and institutional challenges
Details
4. Conclusions
Details
77–92
Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts: A Difficult Relationship
Rainer Grote
Rainer Grote
77–92
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The delimitation of the respective functions of constitutional and ordinary courts: the point of departure
Details
3. The growing overlap of functions between the constitutional court and the ordinary judiciary: contributing factors
Details
4. Conflict and cooperation in practice: a comparative survey
Details
4.1. Germany
Details
4.2. Italy
Details
4.3. Spain
Details
4.4. France
Details
5. Conclusion
Details
93–208
Part II: Constitutional Review Procedures
93–208
93–118
Constitutional Review in Algeria Following the 2016 Reform: With Particular Reference to the “Exception of Unconstitutionality”
Francesco Biagi
Francesco Biagi
93–118
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Constitutional review of legislation in Algeria: Origins, developments and weaknesses
Details
3. The 2016 reform and the strengthening of the Constitutional Council’s position
Details
4. The “exception of unconstitutionality”
Details
4.1. The introduction of a “double-filter” system
Details
4.2. Who is entitled to raise an exception of unconstitutionality?
Details
4.3. The parameter for constitutional review
Details
4.4. The conditions that must be met in order to raise an exception of unconstitutionality
Details
4.5. The effects of the Constitutional Council’s decisions
Details
5. Concluding remarks
Details
119–136
Lebanon’s Constitutional Council: Access Blocked to Protect the Consensus System?
Nizar Saghieh
Nizar Saghieh
119–136
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The Constitutional Council established in the image of the consensus system
Details
2.1. Constitutional taboos to immunize the comprehensive consensus system
Details
2.2. The Constitutional Council’s composition and the means of appointing its members
Details
2.3. The Constitutional Council’s powers
Details
3. The Constitutional Council’s perceptions of its role under the consensus system
Details
3.1. The taboos before the Constitutional Council
Details
3.2. Consensus laws that obviously contravene the Constitution
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
137–160
The Kuwaiti Constitutional Court and its Role in Protecting the Fundamental Liberties
Fawaz Almutairi
Fawaz Almutairi
137–160
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Procedures of filing constitutional motions concerning fundamental liberties
Details
2.1. The body concerned with hearing the appeal of unconstitutionality
Details
2.2. Referral by ordinary trial courts
Details
2.3. Appeal before the Appeals Review Committee
Details
2.4. Direct complaint before the Constitutional Court
Details
2.5. Direct appeal by government and National Assembly
Details
2.6. Binding force of the decision rendered by Constitutional Court
Details
3. Positive constitutional decisions with respect to the protection of fundamental liberties
Details
3.1. Decisions of the Constitutional Court relating to the application of Islamic sharia
Details
3.1.1. The decision of the Constitutional Court regarding hijab of two members of the Kuwaiti National Assembly
Details
3.1.2. The ruling of the Constitutional Court regarding the right of a woman to travel and extract a passport without the consent of her husband
Details
3.2. The Court’s position on legislation affecting the right to equality
Details
3.2.1. The Court’s ruling regarding the equality of women in the housing allowance with men
Details
3.2.2. Ruling on depriving women of housing allowance because of the husband’s benefit by housing care
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
161–188
Constitutional Review after the Arab Spring: Reforms, Challenges and Perspectives
Francesco Biagi
Francesco Biagi
161–188
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Constitutional review bodies before the Arab Spring: Weak defenders of constitutionalism
Details
3. Constitutional review in post-2011 Arab constitutions: Reforms, models and external influences
Details
3.1. A limited strengthening of the independence of constitutional review bodies
Details
3.2. The shift towards a “judicialization” of constitutional review bodies
Details
3.3. The broadening of access
Details
3.4. The expansion of jurisdiction
Details
4. Challenges and perspectives
Details
189–208
Integrating or Polarising? How to Promote Integrative Decision-Making in Constitutional Courts
Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff
Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff
189–208
Details
1. Integrative courts and polarising courts
Details
2. Cultures of deliberation and the institutional frameworks that shape them
Details
2.1. Common-law and civil-law rules of decision-making
Details
2.1.1. Two historical models: seriatim and per curiam decision-making
Details
2.1.2. Mutual approximation of seriatim and per curiam proceedings
Details
2.1.3. The overlooked remaining difference: Majority requirements
Details
2.1.4. Hybrid regimes
Details
2.1.5. Consequences of a majority requirement for reasons
Details
2.2. Other relevant factors
Details
209–270
Part III: Control of Elections and Electoral Laws
209–270
209–228
Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience
Yussef Auf
Yussef Auf
209–228
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Electoral laws: The Supreme Constitutional Court
Details
2.1. The SCC post-enactment judicial review for electoral laws
Details
2.1.1. The constitutionality of laws on parliament
Details
2.1.2. Judicial administration for elections
Details
2.1.3. Dual nationality
Details
2.2. The Supreme Constitutional Court’s pre-enactment judicial review for electoral laws
Details
3. Electoral disputes
Details
3.1. The administrative judiciary (State Council)
Details
3.2. The Court of Cassation
Details
4. National Elections Commission
Details
4. Concluding remarks
Details
229–258
The Extent of the Authority of the Constitutional Court of Kuwait to Annul an Elected Parliament: The Cases of the 2012 Parliaments
Fawaz Almutairi
Fawaz Almutairi
229–258
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The authority empowered to examine elections
Details
2.1. The National Assembly’s competence to examine the electoral disputes
Details
2.2. The basis of Constitutional Court’s competence to examine the electoral appeals
Details
3. Excluding Parliament from effecting the formation of the Constitutional Court
Details
3.1. The method of selecting the Constitutional Court members:
Details
3.2. The government's power to influence the selection of the Constitutional Court’s members by decrees of appointment
Details
4. The methods of case proceeding in the electoral appeals:
Details
5. Constitutional Court’s decisions and their impact on the electoral system
Details
5.1. Constitutional challenges regarding articles of the Election Law, the division of electoral districts, or decrees related to the electoral process
Details
The first case: The nullification of parliamentary election of February 2012.
Details
The second case: The Constitutional Court’s decision rejecting the unconstitutionality of Law 42 of 2006
Details
The third case: The nullification of parliamentary elections of December 2012
Details
5.2. The consequences of Constitutional Court’s decision declared unconstitutionality of decrees related to the electoral process
Details
6. Appeals Examination Committee and its authority on constitutional challenges
Details
6.1. The period before amending the Constitutional Court’s establishment law
Details
6.2. The period after amending the Constitutional Court’s Establishment Law
Details
7. Conclusion
Details
259–270
Challenging the Validity of Membership of the House of Representatives in Jordan
Laith K. Nasrawin
Laith K. Nasrawin
259–270
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Challenging the legitimacy of membership of the Jordanian Parliament
Details
3. Challenging the constitutionality of membership of the Jordanian Parliament
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
271–376
Part IV: Role of Religious Law in the Constitutional Order
271–376
271–290
Religious References in the Constitutions of the Arab World: Islamization of the Constitution or Constitutionalization of Religion?
Nathalie Bernard-Maugiron
Nathalie Bernard-Maugiron
271–290
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Islam and the state’s identity
Details
2.1. References to Islam as the religion of the state
Details
2.2. Other types of religious references to the organization of the state
Details
2.2.1. The head of state
Details
2.2.2. Interference of religious bodies in the political field
Details
2.2.3. Effects of these provisions on the political organization of the State
Details
3. References to the normative value of the sharia
Details
3.1. Constitutional references to the sharia
Details
3.2. Meanings of normativity of the sharia
Details
3.3. Sharia in the legal systems of the Arab states
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
291–306
The Allocation of Power between Religious and Secular Authorities in Egypt
Adel Omar Sherif
Adel Omar Sherif
291–306
Details
1. Introduction: Religion v. state - A deep-rooted struggle
Details
2. Who decides the law in Muslim communities? An ongoing struggle
Details
3. Modern constitutional structures require participation of many actors in the lawmaking process
Details
4. The role of the religious authority in Egypt: From supremacy to declination
Details
5. Constitutional deference to Islamic sharia in Egypt responding to a 20th century’s regional call
Details
6. Egyptian society signifies high-level of religiosity
Details
7. Gradual declination of the applicability of the sharia
Details
8. Islamic states with secular practices
Details
9. Article 2 of the Constitution and the supremacy of the sharia
Details
10. Many actors are there, but are they influential?
Details
11. The final authority in deciding Islamic norms does not belong to the religious actors
Details
12. The rule of the Muslim Brotherhood: An unsuccessful attempt to raise the power of the clergies
Details
13. How the law is finally articulated? The supremacy of the constitutional jurisdiction as to defining Islamic law
Details
14. Three major foundations in deciding Islamic norms
Details
15. Conclusion: The role of the state, and that of the SCC, supersede the role of the religious actors in defining the law
Details
307–328
Islamic Sharia in the Legal Orders of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
Salma Waheedi
Salma Waheedi
307–328
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Saudi Arabia
Details
2.1. Sharia in the constitutional and legal framework
Details
2.2. Islamic sharia and the judiciary
Details
2.3. Religious freedoms
Details
3. Kuwait
Details
3.1. Sharia in the constitutional and legal framework
Details
3.2. Islamic sharia and the Judiciary
Details
3.3. Religious freedoms
Details
329–344
The Changing Constitutional Framework of Church-State Relations in Europe
Rainer Grote
Rainer Grote
329–344
Details
1. Introduction: The centrality of the state-church relationship to the constitutional systems of European states
Details
2. Regulation of the state-church relationship in European constitutions
Details
3. Perseverance of constitutional regulations of the state-church relationship
Details
4. The shift from an institutional to a rights-based approach: The growing influence of human rights law
Details
5. The new challenge: Genuine religious equality in religiously heterogeneous societies
Details
6. Conclusion: The elusive goal of religious equality
Details
345–376
The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on Sharia Law
Angelika Nußberger, Rike Sinder
Angelika Nußberger, Rike Sinder
345–376
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The case-law on Muslims and Islamic Law
Details
2.1. Scepticism and incompatibilities between the convention philosophy and Islam
Details
2.1.1. Critical assessment of sharia in the political context
Details
2.1.2. Neutral assessment of sharia in inheritance and family law
Details
2.1.3. Cautious approach to sharia in freedom-of-religion cases
Details
2.2. Openness towards a world view based on Islam
Details
2.2.1. Islam v. Islamism in freedom-of-speech-cases
Details
2.2.2. The protection of religious groups against hate speech
Details
2.2.2.1. The Court’s jurisprudence on hate speech against Muslims
Details
2.2.2.2. The Court’s jurisprudence on hate speech against Christians
Details
Creative or artistic expression
Details
Journalistic or scholarly religiously offensive speech
Details
2.2.3. Criticism and context
Details
3. Protection of religious pluralism in a difficult environment
Details
3.1. Plurality of state-religion models in Europe
Details
3.2. Protection of democracy as priority
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
377–405
Annex
377–405
377–402
Constitutional Courts and Councils in the Middle East and North Africa: Basic Facts and Figures
Anja Schoeller-Schletter, Robert Poll
Anja Schoeller-Schletter, Robert Poll
377–402
Details
1. Algeria: Constitutional Council / المجلس الدستوري
Details
1.1. Organization
Details
1.2. Jurisdiction
Details
1.3. Procedures
Details
1.4. Decisions
Details
2. Bahrain: Constitutional Court / المحكمة الدستورية
Details
2.1. Organization
Details
2.2. Jurisdiction
Details
2.3. Procedures
Details
2.4. Decisions
Details
3. Egypt: Supreme Constitutional Court / المحكمـــة الدستوريـــة العليــا
Details
3.1. Organization
Details
3.2. Jurisdiction
Details
3.3. Procedures
Details
3.4. Decisions
Details
4. Iraq: Federal Supreme Court / المحكمة الاتحادية العليا
Details
4.1. Organization
Details
4.2. Jurisdiction
Details
4.3. Procedures
Details
4.4. Decisions
Details
5. Jordan: Constitutional Court / المحكمة الدستورية
Details
5.1. Organization
Details
5.2. Jurisdiction
Details
5.3. Procedures
Details
5.4. Decisions
Details
6. Kuwait: Constitutional Court / المحكمة الدستورية
Details
6.1. Organization
Details
6.2. Jurisdiction
Details
6.3. Procedures
Details
6.4. Decisions
Details
7. Lebanon: Constitutional Council / المجلس الدستوري
Details
7.1. Organization
Details
7.2. Jurisdiction
Details
7.3. Procedures
Details
7.4. Decisions
Details
8. Mauritania: Constitutional Council / المجلس الدستوري
Details
8.1. Organization
Details
8.2. Jurisdiction
Details
8.3. Procedures
Details
8.4. Decisions
Details
9. Morocco: Constitutional Court / المحكمة الدستورية
Details
9.1. Organization
Details
9.2. Jurisdiction
Details
9.3. Procedures
Details
9.4. Decisions
Details
10. Palestine: Supreme Constitutional Court / المحكمـــة الدستوريـــة العليــا
Details
10.1. Organization
Details
10.2. Jurisdiction
Details
10.3. Procedures
Details
10.4. Decisions
Details
11. Tunisia: Constitutional Court / المحكمة الدستورية
Details
11.1. Organization
Details
11.2. Jurisdiction
Details
11.3. Procedures
Details
11.4. Decisions
Details
403–405
List of Authors
403–405
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-SA
Access
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa , page 209 - 228
Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience
Autoren
Yussef Auf
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-209
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-7151-6
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-1201-9
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-209
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
