On the Lack of a General Part for EU Private International Law

Zlatan Meškić

doi:10.5771/1435-439X-2022-4-803

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 687–688 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 687–688
- 689–690 Geleitwort 689–690
- 691–708 AUKUS, Quad und ANZUS – Neues und Altes zur Sicherheitsarchitektur Australiens Jürgen Bröhmer Jürgen Bröhmer 691–708
- 709–732 Funktionswandel von Grundfreiheiten und Grundrechten im Recht der Europäischen Union als Legitimationsproblem Christian Calliess Christian Calliess 709–732
- 733–754 25 Jahre europäischer Beitrittsprozess von Osterweiterung über Stillstand zu notwendigen Reformen Mareike Fröhlich, Anja Trautmann Mareike Fröhlich, Anja Trautmann 733–754
- 755–772 European AI Regulation: Brussels Effect versus Human Dignity? Oskar J. Gstrein Oskar J. Gstrein 755–772
- 773–790 Die Russland-Sanktionen der EU – die Kraft, die aus der Krise kommt? Robin van der Hout Robin van der Hout 773–790
- 791–802 The EU Energy Sector in Turmoil. Legal Aspects of the Role of Gas as a Bridge towards the Net-Zero: A Concise Outlook Maria Meng-Papantoni Maria Meng-Papantoni 791–802
- 803–818 On the Lack of a General Part for EU Private International Law Zlatan Meškić Zlatan Meškić 803–818
- 819–842 Der Grundsatz der Energiesolidarität als unionsverfassungsrechtlicher Rechtmäßigkeitsmaßstab: Besprechung der unionsgerichtlichen Entscheidungen in den Rechtssachen T-883/16 und C-848/19 P Kristina Müller Kristina Müller 819–842
- 843–858 The EU’s Commitment to Social and Environmental Standards in its Modernised Trade Defence Instruments Pieter Van Vaerenbergh Pieter Van Vaerenbergh 843–858
- 859–874 Towards an Ever More Differentiated Union? – Exit Strategies from Differentiated Integration Sebastian Zeitzmann Sebastian Zeitzmann 859–874
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Access

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien , page 803 - 818

On the Lack of a General Part for EU Private International Law

Autoren

Zlatan Meškić

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2022-4-803
- ISSN: 1435-439X
- ISSN online: 2942-3589
Abstract

The question of a general part for EU Private International Law has attracted research and debate among PIL scholars long before the EU started to codify this legal field after the Amsterdam Treaty. However, the EU has made no attempt to make use of the existing research to adopt a comprehensive regulation of the general part of EU PIL and has adopted sector-specific regulation with inconsistent regulation of several general institutes. For the occasion of the anniversary of the Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien this paper revisits the topic to answer the question which institutes of PIL should be codified in a general part of EU PIL. The conclusions are made based on four criteria: which general institutes of PIL are already regulated in the EU; are they generally applicable to all special parts of EU PIL; what is their practical relevance; and is there a need for their uniform regulation. The paper analyzes the discrepancies between existing general institutes of EU PIL and offers brief discussions on the possible formulation of some of the institutes for the general part.
Share