Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement – Current State of Play at UNCITRAL

EI – IILCC Study Group on ISDS Reform

doi:10.5771/1435-439X-2022-1-15

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 1–2 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1–2
- 3–14 The Rule of Law in International Economic Relations Thomas Cottier Thomas Cottier 3–14
- 15–74 Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement – Current State of Play at UNCITRAL EI – IILCC Study Group on ISDS Reform EI – IILCC Study Group on ISDS Reform 15–74
- 75–88 Die Verantwortlichkeit der Inhaber von Konten bei sozialen Netzwerken – eine Verschärfung der Anforderungen durch den EGMR durch sein Urteil Sanchez gegen Frankreich? Georg Ress Georg Ress 75–88
- 89–110 Towards a More Restrictive Interpretation of the Right to Liberty in Article 5(1) ECHR? Julia Nordvang Johansen Julia Nordvang Johansen 89–110
- 111–140 The Right to International Solidarity as a Game Changer when it comes to “Crimes of Solidarity”? Julia Jungfleisch Julia Jungfleisch 111–140
- 141–170 Conversion Therapy and its Compatibility with European Human Rights Law Marcus Veinan Marcus Veinan 141–170
- 171–184 CIL-FIT für die Zukunft? Julia Zöchling Julia Zöchling 171–184
- 185–207 Ultra-vires-Rüge im Namen des Volkes: Demokratiefördernd oder -belastend? Shu-Perng Hwang Shu-Perng Hwang 185–207
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Access

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien , page 15 - 74

Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement – Current State of Play at UNCITRAL

Autoren

EI – IILCC Study Group on ISDS Reform

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2022-1-15
- ISSN: 1435-439X
- ISSN online: 2942-3589
Abstract

In the last two decades, investor-State dispute settlement has received continuous criticism related to inter alia the legitimacy, transparency and efficiency of the current system. Since 2017, different options of how to improve the system are discussed at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). The reform options discussed in this context are of high political relevance, considering that investor-State dispute settlement often concerns sensitive topics related to States’ sovereign regulatory powers. In order to provide a overview for all interested parties, this article summarizes and explains the different reform options discussed at UNCITRAL in the last four years. It also presents the positions of the relevant stakeholders, evaluates some of the reform options and gives an outlook over the next steps needed to move the reform efforts forward.a
Share