Zukunftsszenarien und Reformoptionen für die Europäische Union: vom Weißbuch der Kommission zu einer flexibleren Arbeitsmethode

Christian Calliess

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2019-2-97

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- 81–82 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 81–82
- 83–148 AUFSÄTZE 83–148
  - 83–96 Die EU und ihre Nachbarschaftsbeziehungen: etablierte Assoziierungsmodelle und neue Grundformen Barbara Lippert Barbara Lippert 83–96
  - 97–117 Zukunftsszenarien und Reformoptionen für die Europäische Union: vom Weißbuch der Kommission zu einer flexibleren Arbeitsmethode Christian Calliess Christian Calliess 97–117
  - 118–133 Parlamentarische Kontrolle durch Vernetzung? Eine kritische Analyse der Rolle der Interparlamentarischen Konferenz für die GASP/GSVP Daniel Schade Daniel Schade 118–133
  - 134–148 Das Ende der Naivität gegenüber China? Die Reform des europäischen Investitionskontrollregimes Jörn-Carsten Gottwald, Joachim Schild, Dirk Schmidt Jörn-Carsten Gottwald, Joachim Schild, Dirk Schmidt 134–148
- 149–157 FORUM 149–157
  - Vision oder Utopie? Junge Ideen für die Zukunft Europas Friederike Augustin, Jana Schubert Friederike Augustin, Jana Schubert
- 158–164 LITERATUR 158–164
  - 15 Jahre Europäische Nachbarschaftspolitik – eine Bestandsaufnahme Anne Wetzel Anne Wetzel
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Vollzugriff

integration , Seite 97 - 117

Zukunftsszenarien und Reformoptionen für die Europäische Union: vom Weißbuch der Kommission zu einer flexibleren Arbeitsmethode

Autoren

Christian Calliess

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-2-97
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

Tackling the ongoing European ‘polycrisis’ has been complicated by the lack of a consensus between the Member States and among European citizens about the role they want the European Union (EU) to play, its tasks and its future. A Union that has become more diverse due to enlargement now has to deepen in areas that are highly sensitive domestically. Against the backdrop of the scenarios presented in the European Commission’s White Paper on the Future of Europe the author argues for a more flexible working method of the EU. This method should be based on more efficiency by focusing on political priorities and implementing a new concept of cooperative enforcement together with a common understanding of subsidiarity. Where no consensus can be reached greater flexibility and - in the long run - a new architecture of the EU should allow for pioneer groups to move ahead and to lead by positive example.

Abstract

Tackling the ongoing European ‘polycrisis’ has been complicated by the lack of a consensus between the Member States and among European citizens about the role they want the European Union (EU) to play, its tasks and its future. A Union that has become more diverse due to enlargement now has to deepen in areas that are highly sensitive domestically. Against the backdrop of the scenarios presented in the European Commission’s White Paper on the Future of Europe the author argues for a more flexible working method of the EU. This method should be based on more efficiency by focusing on political priorities and implementing a new concept of cooperative enforcement together with a common understanding of subsidiarity. Where no consensus can be reached greater flexibility and - in the long run - a new architecture of the EU should allow for pioneer groups to move ahead and to lead by positive example.
Teilen