Rezeption, Perzeption und Adaption: Erwartungen an die chinesische Rechtsmodernisierung 1904-1930

Robert Heuser

doi:10.5771/0506-7286-2014-3-319

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 283–331 Abhandlungen/Articles 283–331
  - 283–292 Gegenwart und Zukunft der koreanischen Verfassung Kim Hwang Sik Kim Hwang Sik 283–292
  - 293–318 Judicialization of Politics and the Korean Constitutional Court: the Party Chapter Abolition Case Hannes Mosler Hannes Mosler 293–318
  - 319–331 Rezeption, Perzeption und Adaption: Erwartungen an die chinesische Rechtsmodernisierung 1904-1930 Robert Heuser Robert Heuser 319–331
- 332–344 Berichte/Reports 332–344
  - Verfassungsgericht und Oberster Gerichtshof in Indonesien Sebastian Köbler Sebastian Köbler
- 345–354 Buchbesprechungen/Book Reviews 345–354
  - 345–347 Australasia and Pacific Ombudsman Institutions. Mandates, Competences and Good Practice (Roland Seib) """@Ombudsman Institute (Herausgeber)" """@Ombudsman Institute (Herausgeber)" 345–347
  - 347–349 Regional Integration and Economic Development in South Asia (Jan Martin Vogel) Sultan Hafeez Rahman, Sridhar Khatri, Hans-Peter Brunner Sultan Hafeez Rahman, Sridhar Khatri, Hans-Peter Brunner 347–349
  - 349–354 China, the European Union and Global Governance (Katja Levy) Jan Wouters, Tanguy de Wilde, Pierre Defraigne, Jean-Christophe Defraigne Jan Wouters, Tanguy de Wilde, Pierre Defraigne, Jean-Christophe Defraigne 349–354
- 355–366 Bibliographie/Bibliography 355–366
  - Bibliographie / Bibliography
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee , page 319 - 331

Rezeption, Perzeption und Adaption: Erwartungen an die chinesische Rechtsmodernisierung 1904-1930

Autoren

Robert Heuser

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2014-3-319
- ISSN: 0506-7286
- ISSN online: 2941-9603
Zusammenfassung

Between the 1870ies and the outbreak of the Pacific war in 1937 Japan and China undertook fundamental changes in their traditional legal systems by way of legislation strongly following continental Europen models. These changes were not based on the free choice of the political elites of these countries, but were suggested and induced by outside pressure. In this paper certain statements or commentaries of participants in the modernization process as it took place in China during the first third of the 20th century are presented in order to exemplify how the motives of law reform were understood, how the legal cultures involved were perceived, and how the problem of adaptation was tackled.

Abstract

Between the 1870ies and the outbreak of the Pacific war in 1937 Japan and China undertook fundamental changes in their traditional legal systems by way of legislation strongly following continental Europen models. These changes were not based on the free choice of the political elites of these countries, but were suggested and induced by outside pressure. In this paper certain statements or commentaries of participants in the modernization process as it took place in China during the first third of the 20th century are presented in order to exemplify how the motives of law reform were understood, how the legal cultures involved were perceived, and how the problem of adaptation was tackled.
Share