Oligarchie, Demokratie, Anarchie – Drei Idealmodelle vormärzlicher Parteiorganisation

Philipp Erbentraut

doi:10.5771/0340-1758-2017-3-691

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 471–472 EDITORIAL Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer 471–472
- 473–690 DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN 473–690
  - 473–490 Hat das Verfassungsrecht eine Theorie der Opposition – und braucht es eine? Uwe Volkmann Uwe Volkmann 473–490
  - 491–515 Parlamentarische Informationsrechte und Gewaltenteilung in der neueren Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Jelena von Achenbach Jelena von Achenbach 491–515
  - 516–534 „Effektive Opposition“ im Parlament – eine ausgefallene Debatte? Pascale Cancik Pascale Cancik 516–534
  - 535–556 „Her Majesty’s Opposition“: Eine Institution ohne Macht? Rechte der parlamentarischen Opposition in Großbritannien Gernot Sydow, Hendrik Jooß Gernot Sydow, Hendrik Jooß 535–556
  - 557–574 Parlamentarische Opposition in Österreich: Recht und Praxis in Zeiten eines frag- mentierten Parteiensystems Christoph Konrath Christoph Konrath 557–574
  - 575–593 Die schleswig-holsteinische Landtagswahl vom 7 . Mai 2017: Niederlage der „Küstenkoalition“ und erstmals „Jamaika“ im Norden Wilhelm Knelangen Wilhelm Knelangen 575–593
  - 594–613 Das TV-Duell und die Landtagswahl in Schleswig-Holstein: Das Debat-O-Meter als neues Instrument der politischen Kommunikationsforschung Uwe Wagschal, Thomas Waldvogel, Thomas Metz, Bernd Becker, Linus Feiten, Samuel Weishaupt, Kamaljeet Singh Uwe Wagschal, Thomas Waldvogel, Thomas Metz, Bernd Becker, Linus Feiten, Samuel Weishaupt, Kamaljeet Singh 594–613
  - 614–633 Die nordrhein-westfälische Landtagswahl vom 14 . Mai 2017: Schwarz-Gelb statt Rot-Grün Stefan Bajohr Stefan Bajohr 614–633
  - 634–656 Parteiendifferenz in der deutschen Tierschutzpolitik – Gestaltungsspielraum der Länder in neuen Politikfeldern? Colette S. Vogeler Colette S. Vogeler 634–656
  - 657–675 Landesparlamentarismus nach 1945 als Gegenstand der historischen Forschung: Fragestellungen – Perspektiven – Quellen für die südwestdeutschen Landtage Michael Kitzing Michael Kitzing 657–675
  - 676–690 Die erzwungene Verfassungsänderung: Das NPD-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 17. Januar 2017 und die Reaktion des verfassungsändernden Gesetzgebers Winfried Kluth Winfried Kluth 676–690
- 691–711 AUFSATZ 691–711
  - Oligarchie, Demokratie, Anarchie – Drei Idealmodelle vormärzlicher Parteiorganisation Philipp Erbentraut Philipp Erbentraut
- 712–730 REZENSIONEN 712–730
- 731–732 MITTEILUNG 731–732
- 733–738 ABSTRACTS 733–738
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Vollzugriff

ZParl Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen , Seite 691 - 711

Oligarchie, Demokratie, Anarchie – Drei Idealmodelle vormärzlicher Parteiorganisation

Autoren

Philipp Erbentraut

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2017-3-691
- ISSN print: 0340-1758
- ISSN online: 0340-1758
Zusammenfassung

How were political parties in the political philosophy of the German pre-March (“Vormärz”) 1815 till 1848 perceived? A revision of some long-standing prejudices in favor of a more benign view on the pre-March concept of political parties is necessary . In fact a modern and elaborate theory and sociology of political parties is already to be found at the eve of the 1848 German revolution . Although among the relevant academic literature, early German party theorists in general were accused of having interpreted parties first and foremost as loose associations of ideologically like-minded persons (“Gesinnungsgemeinschaften”) being unable or unwilling to tolerate real political groups . In fact an understanding of parties as political organization competing for power already was a central element of the pre-March concept of party . The general insight into the organizational character of political parties has led the theorists, in a second step of analysis, to deal more closely with the preferred model of party organization . If the ideas of the internal structure of parties, which were circulating at the time, were to be bundled together, one can already speak of three ideal models of party organization: oligarchy, democracy and anarchy . The findings are based on a broad analysis of more than 250 contemporary German text sources originating from 1815 to 1848 .

Abstract

How were political parties in the political philosophy of the German pre-March (“Vormärz”) 1815 till 1848 perceived? A revision of some long-standing prejudices in favor of a more benign view on the pre-March concept of political parties is necessary . In fact a modern and elaborate theory and sociology of political parties is already to be found at the eve of the 1848 German revolution . Although among the relevant academic literature, early German party theorists in general were accused of having interpreted parties first and foremost as loose associations of ideologically like-minded persons (“Gesinnungsgemeinschaften”) being unable or unwilling to tolerate real political groups . In fact an understanding of parties as political organization competing for power already was a central element of the pre-March concept of party . The general insight into the organizational character of political parties has led the theorists, in a second step of analysis, to deal more closely with the preferred model of party organization . If the ideas of the internal structure of parties, which were circulating at the time, were to be bundled together, one can already speak of three ideal models of party organization: oligarchy, democracy and anarchy . The findings are based on a broad analysis of more than 250 contemporary German text sources originating from 1815 to 1848 .
Teilen