Wann wird Kooperation zur Mittäterschaft?

Gerhard Beestermöller

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2016-3-211

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 165–223 THEMENSCHWERPUNK T 165–223
  - 165–170 Threats of a Different Kind: China and Russia in U.S. Security Policy Discourse Sybille Reinke de Buitrago Sybille Reinke de Buitrago 165–170
  - 171–176 The West is Russia’s Main Adversary, and the Answer is New Generation Warfare Jānis Bērziņš Jānis Bērziņš 171–176
  - 177–184 Bedrohungswahrnehmungen und sicherheitspolitische Konzepte Chinas Peter Buchas Peter Buchas 177–184
  - 185–190 Drugs, Piracy and Sovereignty: Brazil, United States and European Union’s Security Perspectives for South Atlantic Erico Duarte Erico Duarte 185–190
  - 191–197 The South African Threat Agenda: Between Political Agendas, Perceptions and Contradictions Abel Esterhuyse Abel Esterhuyse 191–197
  - 198–203 Bedrohungswahrnehmung und Sicherheitskonzepte in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Simon Koschut Simon Koschut 198–203
  - 204–210 Bedrohungswahrnehmungen und sicherheitspolitische Konzepte im Vergleich: EU, Frankreich und Schweden Gunther Hauser Gunther Hauser 204–210
  - 211–217 Wann wird Kooperation zur Mittäterschaft? Gerhard Beestermöller Gerhard Beestermöller 211–217
  - 218–223 „Zur Sorgfaltsverantwortung im Cyberraum. Anforderungen an eine neue deutsche Cyber Sicherheitsstrategie“ Annegret Bendiek Annegret Bendiek 218–223
- 224–224 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 224–224
- 225–230 BESPRECHUNGEN 225–230
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Kein Zugriff

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , Seite 211 - 217

Wann wird Kooperation zur Mittäterschaft?

Autoren

Gerhard Beestermöller

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2016-3-211
- ISSN print: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

Anyone performing or omitting an action inevitably faces the problem that success depends upon the cooperation of also those who follow a morally dubious agenda and who try to avail themselves of this cooperation. The same is true in politics. When is it permitted to cooperate with states of dubious policies? The article makes its arguments based on the perspective of an ethics of responsibility (Verantwortungsethik), a perspective that places significance in the consequences of a policy. In order to structure this complex problem and to generate some orientations for decision-making, the article retrieves several classic differentiations and principles and interprets them within the modern arena.

Abstract

Anyone performing or omitting an action inevitably faces the problem that success depends upon the cooperation of also those who follow a morally dubious agenda and who try to avail themselves of this cooperation. The same is true in politics. When is it permitted to cooperate with states of dubious policies? The article makes its arguments based on the perspective of an ethics of responsibility (Verantwortungsethik), a perspective that places significance in the consequences of a policy. In order to structure this complex problem and to generate some orientations for decision-making, the article retrieves several classic differentiations and principles and interprets them within the modern arena.
Teilen