Prohibition of Threats of Force: A Silently Contested Norm?

Agata Kleczkowska

doi:10.17104/0044-2348-2023-1-155

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–10 Comment 1–10
  - Chilean Insights for Progressive Constitutionalism Armin von Bogdandy Armin von Bogdandy
- 11–176 Abhandlungen 11–176
  - 11–38 Norm Contestation in the Law Against War: Towards an Interdisciplinary Analytical Framework Max Lesch, Christian Marxsen Max Lesch, Christian Marxsen 11–38
  - 39–64 Contesting Use of Force Norms Through Technological Practices Ingvild Bode Ingvild Bode 39–64
  - 65–90 Mitigating International Norms Through Contestation: Peaceful Purposes in Space Law and the Security Dilemma Giulia Persoz Giulia Persoz 65–90
  - 91–118 Of Norms and Ambiguity: The Contested Authority of UN Security Council and African Union in the Use of Force in Africa John-Mark Iyi John-Mark Iyi 91–118
  - 119–154 Norm Contestation for Strategic Effect: Legal Narratives as Information Advantage Aurel Sari Aurel Sari 119–154
  - 155–176 Prohibition of Threats of Force: A Silently Contested Norm? Agata Kleczkowska Agata Kleczkowska 155–176
- 177–198 Buchbesprechungen 177–198
  - 177–185 Riepl, Michael: Russian Contributions to International Humanitarian Law. A Contrastive Analysis of Russia’s Historical Role and Its Current Practice Jonas Wieschollek Jonas Wieschollek 177–185
  - 186–192 Neumeier, Christian: Kompetenzen. Zur Entstehung des deutschen öffent- lichen Rechts Konstantin Klopp Konstantin Klopp 186–192
  - 193–198 Senti, Richard: Geschichte der internationalen Handels- und Investitions- abkommen. Jedes Abkommen schreibt seine eigene Geschichte Ludwig Gramlich Ludwig Gramlich 193–198
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-SA Access

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law , page 155 - 176

Prohibition of Threats of Force: A Silently Contested Norm?

Autoren

Agata Kleczkowska

DOI
- doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2023-1-155
- ISSN: 0044-2348
- ISSN online: 2942-3562
Zusammenfassung

The prohibition of threats of force, although included in Article 2 of the United Nations (UN) Charter, among the principles upon which the United Nations is built, often plays a secondary role in the maintenance of international peace and security. The aim of the present paper is to verify how violations of the prohibition of threats of force influence its current status. To this end, the paper is divided into three major parts. The first briefly discusses the conditions of the legality of threats of force. The second presents two examples of threats of force: when threats of force were followed by the use of force, as well as when no use of force took place after the threats of force were made. The final part of the paper discusses the status of the prohibition, examining whether it is a case of non-application, falling into desuetude, silent contestation, or mere violation of a legal norm.
Share