Native Peoples and Knowledge Organization: Perspective from the Indigenous Subject Representation to Promote Latin American Approaches

Mario Barité; Mirtha Rauch

doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2024-8-626

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- I–II Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis I–II
- 561–609 Articles 561–609
  - 561–581 Ontologies for Semantic Annotation: Proposal for an Ontological Multimedia Reference Model Daniela Lucas da Silva Lemos, Renato Rocha Souza Daniela Lucas da Silva Lemos, Renato Rocha Souza 561–581
  - 582–599 Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) in the Context of ISKO: A Domain Analysis of the Brazilian and North American Chapters Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros , Maria Amália Cassol Lied, Waleska da Silva Rocha, Kamila de Andrade Moura Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros , Maria Amália Cassol Lied, Waleska da Silva Rocha, Kamila de Andrade Moura 582–599
  - 600–609 Critical Archival Studies: Exploring an Emerging Domain Anderson Berbesi, Natália Tognoli Anderson Berbesi, Natália Tognoli 600–609
- 610–699 Special Issue – Critical and Social Knowledge Organization – Part II 610–699
  - 610–612 Introduction to the Special Issue: Critical and Social Knowledge Organization Suellen Oliveira Milani, Widad Mustafa El Hadi, Natália Tognoli Suellen Oliveira Milani, Widad Mustafa El Hadi, Natália Tognoli 610–612
  - 613–625 Sort of People: Considerations About the Ontogeny of Autism in the Dewey Decimal System, 1942–2023 Dóra Pákozdi Dóra Pákozdi 613–625
  - 626–641 Native Peoples and Knowledge Organization: Perspective from the Indigenous Subject Representation to Promote Latin American Approaches Mario Barité, Mirtha Rauch Mario Barité, Mirtha Rauch 626–641
  - 642–659 Organization and Representation of Indigenous Scientific Production: A Case Study on the Institutional Repository in Brazil Caroline Periotto, Felipe Arakaki, Jair de Jesus Massa, Luzia Sigoli Fernandes Costa, Luciana de Souza Gracioso Caroline Periotto, Felipe Arakaki, Jair de Jesus Massa, Luzia Sigoli Fernandes Costa, Luciana de Souza Gracioso 642–659
  - 660–666 Provocations of Process in Critical Knowledge Organization Work Julia Bullard Julia Bullard 660–666
  - 667–685 Knowledge Organization Systems Classifying Crimes of Violence Against Women, Homicide of Women and Feminicide: A Proposal Rochelle Martins Alvorcem, Gercina Ângela de Lima, Maria Cristina Vieira de Freitas Rochelle Martins Alvorcem, Gercina Ângela de Lima, Maria Cristina Vieira de Freitas 667–685
  - 686–699 Drag Storytimes and Bibliographic Invisibility: A Comparative Analysis of Picture Book Subject Metadata Sarah Barriage, Beth Strickland Bloch, Vanessa Kitzie Sarah Barriage, Beth Strickland Bloch, Vanessa Kitzie 686–699
- 700–711 Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization 700–711
  - Bibliography (Field of Study) Birger Hjørland Birger Hjørland
- 712–712 Peer Review in 2024 712–712
- 713–713 Impressum 713–713
- 714–714 Scope – Aims 714–714
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Vollzugriff

KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION , Seite 626 - 641

Native Peoples and Knowledge Organization: Perspective from the Indigenous Subject Representation to Promote Latin American Approaches

Autoren

Mario Barité Mirtha Rauch

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2024-8-626
- ISSN print: 0943-7444
- ISSN online: 2942-3309
Abstract

The situation of many indigenous cultures in Australia, North, Central, and South America can be described as one of marginalization or minorization. Subject representation of Indigenous knowledge constitutes one of the contemporary crossroads since, through it, the predominant mentalities of classificationists, classifiers, and indexers are revealed, and this can consolidate hegemonic visions or propose appropriate alternatives to the cultural particularities of Indigenous peoples. From a critical perspective, this work aims to contribute to the systematization of the growing literature on indigenous warrant in KO. The methodology offers quantitative and qualitative data as results of the application of six categories of analysis. The most significant scientific production on the Indigenous issue in KO has come from Canada, the United States, and Australia since 1971. In Latin America, publications only began in 2023, particularly in Brazil. We identified two possible paths to improve the subject representation of the area: adaptation of pre-existing schemes or the creation of new knowledge organization systems specialized in Indigenous culture. Cultural hospitality and indigenous warrant are two relevant tools to guide solutions to improve the subject representation of native cultures. Among other conclusions, from the KO, progress was made in the hierarchy of indigenous knowledge, and there was a need for these cultures to impose their ways of categorizing, naming, and relating things. The urgency of promoting academic production on the subject in Latin America is highlighted, considering the historical and contemporary dimension of its great indigenous civilizations throughout its territory.
Teilen