Jump to content
On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU Should Consider Collective Management of P2P / ASCAP VCL Model
On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU Should Consider Collective Management of P2P / ASCAP VCL Model
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
2–8
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
2–8
Details
9–12
Acronyms and Abbreviations
9–12
Details
13–15
I. Introduction
13–15
Details
16–25
II. Uncovering the “P2P dilemma”: technical and economic background of P2P
16–25
16–18
A. Technical background: jurisprudence driven technology?
16–18
Details
18–25
B. Economic background
18–25
Details
26–39
III. Copyright, territoriality and P2P
26–39
26–30
A. Territoriality and harmonization
26–30
Details
30–35
B. Legally relevant P2P acts and exclusive rights
30–35
Details
35–39
C. Exceptions and limitations
35–39
Details
40–51
IV. Collective management of copyright
40–51
40–46
A. Operation and types of collective management
40–46
40–42
1. General considerations
40–42
Details
42–43
2. Voluntary collective licensing
42–43
Details
43–44
3. Blanket licenses
43–44
Details
44–46
4. Mandatory collective management
44–46
Details
46–51
B. Mass online uses and multi-territorial licensing
46–51
Details
52–76
V. Collective management of P2P: a viable alternative?
52–76
52–53
A. In general
52–53
Details
53–66
B. Non voluntary approaches to P2P
53–66
53–59
1. Legal license
53–59
Details
a) Without statutory remuneration or “digital abandon”
Details
b) With statutory remuneration
Details
59–62
2. Mandatory collective management
59–62
Details
62–66
3. Extended collective licensing
62–66
Details
66–76
C. Voluntary collective licensing
66–76
66–67
1. Basic proposal and features
66–67
Details
67–68
2. Benefits
67–68
Details
68–76
3. Compatibility
68–76
Details
a) E.U. secondary legislation
Details
b) Participation
Details
c) Free riding
Details
d) Logistics and implementation
Details
e) Royalties
Details
f) Cross-subsidization
Details
g) Coexistence
Details
h) “Remixes”
Details
77–80
VI. Conclusions
77–80
Details
81–85
Annex I: P2P “Generations”
81–85
Details
86–87
Annex II: CMOs as Intermediaries
86–87
Details
88–88
Annex III: CISAC Model for Cross-border Licensing 87 Annex IV: Mandatory Collective Management in the Rental Right Directive
88–88
Details
89–90
Annex V: Santiago Agreement Model
89–90
Details
91–92
Annex VI: IFPI Simulcasting Model 90 Annex VII: The Online Music Recommendation Model, CELAS and My Video
91–92
Details
93–94
Annex VIII: ASCAP VCL Model
93–94
Details
95–104
List of Works Cited
95–104
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU Should Consider Collective Management of P2P , page 93 - 94
ASCAP VCL Model
Autoren
João Pedro Quintais
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783845241906-93
ISBN print: 978-3-8329-7638-5
ISBN online: 978-3-8452-4190-6
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783845241906-93
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
