Jump to content
Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity / Why Are Most Published Research Findings Under-Theorized?
Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity / Why Are Most Published Research Findings Under-Theorized?
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–6
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–6
Details
7–22
Cycles and Coexistences, Comparisons and Catastrophes
Benjamin Krämer, Philipp Müller
Benjamin Krämer, Philipp Müller
7–22
Details
An Introduction to the Volume
Cycles and Continuities
Competitions and Coexistences
Crises and Comparisons
Catastrophes and Choices
References
23–52
Why Are Most Published Research Findings Under-Theorized?
Benjamin Krämer
Benjamin Krämer
23–52
Details
Or: Are We in an Interpretation Crisis?
What Kind of Theory?
The Problems with Bad Theory
Some Types of Insufficiently Systematic Theorizing
Problems with the Validity of Theories and Measurements
Problems with Critical Reflection of Studies and with Conclusions
Conclusion
References
53–66
Is Communication via the Internet Public Communication?
Hans-Bernd Brosius
Hans-Bernd Brosius
53–66
Details
Changes in the Media Landscape
Mediated Communication as a Key Concept?
Public Communication 2.0 as the Subject of the Field
Data Specification and Adaptation of Methods
Conclusion
References
67–95
How to Capture the Relations and Dynamics within the Networked Public Sphere?
Christoph Neuberger
Christoph Neuberger
67–95
Details
Modes of Interaction as a New Concept
Concepts for Analyzing the Public Sphere
Relations
Dynamics
Towards a Theory of the Dynamic Networked Public Sphere
Limitations of Public Sphere Theory
Limitations of Social Network Analysis
Modes of Interaction as Constellations of Actors
Modes of Interaction – A Literature Review
Proposal for a Typology of Modes of Interaction within the Public Sphere
Dyadic Modes of One-Way Communication
Dyadic Modes of Two-Way Communication
Triadic Modes of Indirect Communication
Systematization
Modes of Interaction in Subsystems of Society
Media Change and Modes of Interaction
The Context of Mass Media
The Internet as Context
Conclusion
References
96–117
How Does the Internet Change Group Processes?
Johanna Schindler
Johanna Schindler
96–117
Details
Applying the Model of Collective Information Processing (MCIP) to Online Environments
The Foundations of Collective Information Processing
Social Identity
Small Groups as Information Processors
Application to Large Groups Online
Modes of Collective Information Processing
Automatic vs. Systematic Processing
Closed vs. Open Processing
Technical Possibilities in Online Spaces
Participation
Selectivity
Interaction
Interconnectedness
Automatization
Modes of Collective Information Processing in Online Spaces
For Automatic Processing
For Systematic Processing
For Closed Processing
For Open Processing
Discussion
Automatic vs. Systematic Processing Online
Closed vs. Open Processing Online
Conclusion
References
118–166
Does Social Media Use Promote Political Mass Polarization?
Katharina Ludwig, Philipp Müller
Katharina Ludwig, Philipp Müller
118–166
Details
A Structured Literature Review
Political Mass Polarization: Concept and Overview
Forms and Measurement of Political Mass Polarization
Political Mass Polarization and Fragmentation
Origins and Consequences of Political Mass Polarization
Social Media Use: A Driver of Political Mass Polarization?
Procedure
Literature Selection
Literature Categorization
Review of Studies
Fragmentation or Polarization?
Group Polarization
Mass Polarization
Quantitative Review of Studies
Qualitative Review of Studies
Evidence from Dual-Party Systems and Multi-Party Systems
Specific Social Media Platforms and Method Choices
Fragmentation vs. Polarization Studies
Takeaways and Research Desiderata
References
Appendices
167–207
Journalism or Public Relations?
Romy Fröhlich
Romy Fröhlich
167–207
Details
Proposal for Conceptualizing a User-Oriented Research Program on the Confounding of the Two Genres Online
Causes, Relevance, and Consequences of the Problem
State of Research
Theoretical Implications for the Distinction Between Journalistic Texts/Products and ‘Particular-Interest Oriented Persuasive Simulations’ of Journalism (PIoPS)
Differentiation Dimensions from the Content Perspective
The ‘Journalistic Quality’ Dimension
The ‘Attention’ Dimension
The Contingency-Oriented Linguistic Dimension at the Text Level
The Dimension ‘Persuasion and Ethics in PR’
Differentiation Dimensions from an Audience Perspective: Recipient Characteristics and Reception Behavior
Operationalization Concept: Design of a Structural Model
Challenges for Operationalization
Selection of Study Design and Stimulus Material for Audience Research
Content Analyses
Concluding Remarks
References
208–222
Political Advertising – Good or Bad?
Christina Holtz-Bacha
Christina Holtz-Bacha
208–222
Details
The Heterogeneity of U.S. Research Findings and Their Limited Validity for Europe
Defining Political Advertising
Framework Conditions
What Do We Know About the Effects of Political Advertising?
Conclusion
References
223–244
Does the Media System Explain Individual Media Use and Media Effects?
Cornelia Wallner
Cornelia Wallner
223–244
Details
Findings From a Systematizing Literature Review
Different Models of Media Systems
Media Systems and Media Content
Systematizing Literature Review
Results
Media Use
Political Knowledge
The Relevance of Political Parallelism
Cross-Cutting Exposure
Audience Fragmentation
Online Political Participation
Media and Social Change
Synopsis
Concluding Remarks
References
245–273
Do People Really Not Agree on What Can be Said?
Carsten Reinemann, Anna-Luisa Sacher
Carsten Reinemann, Anna-Luisa Sacher
245–273
Details
Individual Differences in the Perception of Microaggressive, Derogatory and Hate Speech Against Women
Freedom of Speech and (Potentially) Harmful Speech
Freedom of Speech in the Context of Misogynistic Statements
Types of (Potentially) Harmful Speech
Predictors of the Perception of (Potentially) Harmful Speech
Methods
Dependent Variables
Independent Variables
Sociodemographics
Experiences of Discrimination
Political Predispositions
Media Trust
Results
Descriptive Analyses of Perceptions of (Potentially) Harmful Statements
Explanatory Analyses of Predictors of the Perceptions of (Potentially) Harmful Statements
Conclusion
References
274–293
How Does One’s Season of Birth Influence Television- and Music-Genre Preferences? And Why?
Klaus Schönbach
Klaus Schönbach
274–293
Details
An Exploratory Analysis
Method
Measurement
Analyses
Results
Summary, Conclusions and Discussion
References
294–316
Modes of Authentication
Felix Frey, Benjamin Krämer, Wolfram Peiser
Felix Frey, Benjamin Krämer, Wolfram Peiser
294–316
Details
Realism Cues and Media Users’ Assessment of Realism Across Media and Genres
Conceptions of Media Realism
Realism Assessments by Users
Method
Results
Mainstream Media Audience (MMA, 18.6 %)
Professional Journalism Objectivists (PJO, 18.6%)
Citizen Oriented (CO, 17.7 %)
Mainstream Media Skeptics (MMS, 4.9%)
Coherence-Seekers (CS, 19.8%)
Independents (IN, 20.3%)
Conclusion
References
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-SA
Access
Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity , page 23 - 52
Why Are Most Published Research Findings Under-Theorized?
Autoren
Benjamin Krämer
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748928232-23
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8402-8
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2823-2
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748928232-23
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
