Jump to content
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights / Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights / Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–10
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–10
Details
13–78
A. Human Rights and Procedural Law
13–78
13–34
Protecting Human Rights Through Criminal Law: The Revival of the Procedural Obligations
Jacopo Roberti di Sarsina, Katharina Braun
Jacopo Roberti di Sarsina, Katharina Braun
13–34
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. Protecting Human Rights through Criminal Law: The Jurisprudence of the ECtHR
Details
I. Positive Obligations and Criminal Law
Details
II. The Procedural Obligations to Investigate and Prosecute
Details
1. The Standard for an Effective Investigation
Details
2. Criticism of the Court’s Approach to Criminal Law Measures
Details
3. Unintentional Infliction of Death or Life-Threatening Injuries
Details
C. The Rationales behind the Obligations to Criminalise, Investigate, and Prosecute
Details
D. Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
35–54
The European Court of Human Rights and Article 18 – An Indicator for the State of Democracy in Europe?
Christiane Schmaltz
Christiane Schmaltz
35–54
Details
A. Introduction – An Alarming Tendency
Details
B. Article 18 ECHR – Autonomous Application Linked with Substantive Convention Guarantees
Details
C. Development of the Case Law – From Uncertainty to Clarification
Details
D. Application of Article 18 in Conjunction with Article 6 – Inconsistency, but Positive Signals
Details
E. Burden and Standard of Proof
Details
I. Burden of Proof – Open Questions and Lack of Guidance for Applicants
Details
II. Standard of Proof – The Usual Approach
Details
III. Application of these Principles – A Safeguard against Undemocratic Tendencies
Details
F. Non-Examination of Article 18 – Missed Chances to ‘Raise the Red Flag’
Details
G. Conclusion – A Developing Tool in Need of Sharpening
Details
Bibliography
Details
55–78
The Copenhagen Declaration: Wrapping up the Interlaken Reform?
Helga Molbæk-Steensig
Helga Molbæk-Steensig
55–78
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. The Interlaken Reform: The Latest Chapter in a History of Reforms
Details
C. Progress in the Interlaken Process up until Copenhagen
Details
D. The Copenhagen Declaration
Details
E. Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
81–232
B. Fundamental Human Rights Principles Facing New Challenges
81–232
81–102
How many Strikeouts are too many? The ECtHR’s Evolving Approach to Repetitive Cases and the Limits of Efficiency
Edith Wagner
Edith Wagner
81–102
Details
A. The Increase in Strikeouts
Details
B. Strikeouts and Repetitive Cases
Details
I. The Widespread Disregard for the Obligations under the Convention
Details
II. Ukraine and the Chernobyl Victims
Details
C. The Court’s Evolving Procedural Approach
Details
I. 2001 to 2009: The First Friendly Settlement and Case-by-Case Adjudication
Details
II. 2009: The Pilot Judgment Procedure
Details
III. From 2012 to 2015: The Fast-Track Procedure
Details
1. The Procedure for Well-Established Case Law
Details
2. Unilateral Declarations
Details
IV. 2017: The Mass Strikeout in Burmych
Details
D. Appraising the Judgment in Burmych
Details
I. The Flawed Prioritisation of Non-repetitive over Repetitive Cases
Details
II. The Lack of Weighing and Balancing
Details
III. The Substantive Evolution of the Convention
Details
IV. The Lack of a Public Hearing: Perceived Procedural Fairness and Legitimacy
Details
E. Conclusion
Details
I. A Call for more Realism
Details
II. The further Development of the Convention and Compliance with Existing Obligations
Details
III. Efficiency at the Expense of the Court’s Legitimacy?
Details
ANNEX
Details
Bibliography
Details
103–132
Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers under Human Rights Law
Veronika Bílková
Veronika Bílková
103–132
Details
A. Who are Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers?
Details
I. Who are Human Rights Defenders?
Details
II. Who are Whistleblowers?
Details
III. What are the Shared Features and the Differences between the two Groups?
Details
B. How does the Increased Vulnerability of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers Manifest Itself?
Details
I. Private Life and Safety
Details
II. Activities in the Public Space
Details
III. Economic and Social Status
Details
IV. Increased Vulnerability of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers
Details
C. Legal Regulations Applicable to Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers
Details
I. Legal Standards Applicable to Human Rights Defenders
Details
II. Legal Standards Applicable to Whistleblowers
Details
D. Conclusions
Details
Bibliography
Details
133–164
The ECtHR’s Jurisprudence on the Prohibition of Collective Expulsions in Cases of Pushbacks at European Borders: A Critical Perspective
Hanaa Hakiki
Hanaa Hakiki
133–164
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. The Prohibition of Collective Expulsion and Strasbourg: A Basic Definition
Details
I. Expulsion
Details
II. Collective
Details
III. Alien
Details
C. The ‘Own Culpable Conduct’ Exception
Details
I. Conditions of Applicability
Details
II. Genuine and Effective Access to Means of Legal Entry and Cogent Reasons
Details
1.‘Genuine and Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to Rights
Details
2. ‘Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to Rights before Domestic Courts
Details
III. Impact of the ‘Own Culpable Conduct’ Exception on the Applicability of Article 4 Protocol 4 ECHR at Borders
Details
D. The Prohibition of Collective Expulsions: A Comparative Conclusion
Details
I. The Prohibition of Collective Expulsions within the ECHR Framework
Details
1. Article 3 ECHR and the Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
Details
2. Article 13 ECHR and the Right to an Effective Remedy
Details
II. The Prohibition of Collective Expulsions in Other Regional Human Rights Instruments
Details
1. The American Convention on Human Rights
Details
2. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Details
E. Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
165–214
Protecting Democratic Elections Against Online Influence via “Fake News” and Hate Speech – The French Loi Avia and Loi No. 2018–1202, the German Network Enforcement Act and the EU’s Digital Services A...
Dominik Steiger
Dominik Steiger
165–214
Details
A. The Facts: Old Habits of Influencing Elections Die Hard – And How Legislatures Deal With It
Details
I. A Very Short History of Influencing Elections
Details
II. Today’s Story of Influencing Elections – Manipulating the Democratic Process via “Fake News” and Hate Speech
Details
1. “Fake News” and the Difference between Mis-, Dis- and Mal-Information
Details
2. Hate Speech: Spreading Hatred based on Intolerance
Details
3. The Recent Rise of “Fake News” and Hate Speech in the Context of Elections
Details
III. Fighting Back – European States’ and the EU’s Response to Counter Election Influence
Details
1. The French Approach: Generally Combatting Hate Speech; “Fake News” only in Election Times
Details
a) Loi Avia Against Hate Speech: Not Enough Time and Too Much Discretion
Details
b) Loi No. 2018–1202 Against the Manipulation of Information: A much more Differentiated and Precise Approach
Details
2. The German Approach: Generally Combatting Hate Speech and – less so – “Fake News”
Details
3. The EU Approach: Adding an Additional Layer to the Protection of Elections
Details
a) Personal and Material Scope of Application
Details
b) (Excluding) Liability of Online Platforms
Details
c) Notice and Takedown Procedure and Legal Remedies
Details
d) “Fake News” and Advertisement Regulation
Details
e) Further Duties of Very Large Online Platforms
Details
f) Fines and Penalties
Details
g) Summary – Regulating “Fake News” and Hate Speech, Not Only in Election Times
Details
4. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries in Different Ways
Details
B. The Law: Applying the ECHR to Laws Regulating “Fake News” and Hate Speech
Details
I. Who is Protected and Who is Bound by the ECHR? Of Individuals and States, the EU, Companies, and Bots
Details
1. Individuals – Protected by the ECHR
Details
2. Companies and Bots – Protected and Indirectly Bound by the ECHR
Details
3. States and the EU – Bound but not Protected by the ECHR
Details
4. Summary – Personal Application as a Mainly Procedural Question, not a Material Question
Details
II. The Scope of the ECHR’s Substantive Protection in Light of the French, German and EU Legislation Regulating Online Speech
Details
1. Freedom of Expression on the Internet – Offline Rules also Apply Online
Details
2. The Material Scope of Freedom of Expression
Details
3. Right to Receive Information
Details
III. Freedom of Expression v. Protection of Elections – Justifying the French, German, and EU Legislation Regulating Online Speech
Details
1. Protection of Elections as a Legitimate Aim Prescribed by Law
Details
a) Protection of Elections as a Legitimate Aim
Details
b) Prescribed by Law, especially Foreseeability and Effective Judicial Review
Details
aa) Foreseeability: What is Manifestly Illegal Content?
Details
bb) Effective Judicial Review: Some Work to be Done
Details
cc) Summary: DSA-Draft as a Model for National Legislation
Details
2. The Right Balance between Protecting Elections and Ensuring Freedom of Expression
Details
a) Different Rights and Interests to be taken into Account
Details
b) Dis- and Mal-Information and Hate Speech
Details
c) The Online Speech Case Law of the ECtHR
Details
aa) Delfi v. Estonia (2015) – Demanding a Notice and Takedown Procedure ….
Details
bb) MTE and Index.hu ZRT v. Hungary (2016) – …. But not in all Cases
Details
cc) Pihl v. Sweden (2017) – Limited Liability for Small Blogs
Details
dd) Høiness v. Norway (2019) – Reiteration of the Court’s Cautious Approach
Details
d) Application of the Court’s Case Law: Has the Right Balance Been Found?
Details
IV. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries while Ensuring Freedom of Expression
Details
Bibliography
Details
215–232
A Culture of Justification or a Culture of Presumption? The Turn to Procedural Review and the Normative Function of Proportionality at the European Court of Human Rights
Alain Zysset
Alain Zysset
215–232
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. The turn to procedural review (‘TPR’)
Details
C. The TPR, Proportionality and Justification
Details
I. Authority and Justification
Details
II. From proportionality to justification…
Details
III. And back...
Details
D. Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
235–306
C. Human Rights and National Legal Orders
235–306
235–260
Judicial and Prosecutorial Independence in Europe: How Politicized Judges and Prosecutors Undermine the Right to a Fair Trial in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
Stefanie Lemke
Stefanie Lemke
235–260
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. The Role and Responsibilities of Judges and Prosecutors
Details
C. Country Studies
Details
I. Azerbaijan
Details
II. Russia
Details
III. Ukraine
Details
D. Outlook
Details
Bibliography
Details
261–290
The Role and Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights Beyond States Parties: The curious case of the ECHR in Kosovo
Beti Hohler, Barbara Sonczyk
Beti Hohler, Barbara Sonczyk
261–290
Details
A. Introduction
Details
B. Setting the Scene
Details
I. Short Political History of Kosovo: from an Autonomous Province to Declaration of Independence
Details
C. International Presence in Kosovo and the ECHR
Details
I. Kosovo's Relationship with the ECHR: How it all Began
Details
II. UNMIK and EULEX Human Rights Review Mechanisms and Their Reliance on the ECHR
Details
D. Current status of the ECHR in Kosovo: The Constitution and Beyond
Details
I. Incorporation of the ECHR in the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo
Details
II. The Status of ECtHR’s Jurisprudence within Kosovo’s Constitutional Framework
Details
III. Judicial Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the Kosovo Legal System
Details
1. The Constitutional Court
Details
2. Individual Referrals
Details
3. Strengthening the Domestic Capacity to Implement Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in accordance with the Principle of Subsidiarity
Details
E. Beyond the Constitution – the ECHR as a Directly Applicable Source of Law for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers
Details
I. Legal Framework of the KSC
Details
II. Implications of the Legal Framework of the KSC
Details
III. The ECHR and War Crimes Cases in Former Yugoslavia: A Valuable Source?
Details
F. Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
291–306
Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law – New Developments with regard to Germany
Robert Frau
Robert Frau
291–306
Details
A. Introduction: The ECHR’s Position in Germany
Details
I. Constitutional Framework
Details
II. The ECHR’s position in the German Legal Order
Details
B. Human Rights Law in Times of Armed Conflict
Details
I. General Relationship between the two Regimes
Details
II. Derogations from Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict and other Public Emergencies
Details
C. Extraterritorial Applicability of Human Rights Law
Details
D. New Developments in Jurisprudence
Details
I. European Court of Human Rights: Al-Skeini
Details
II. European Court of Human Rights: Hanan
Details
III. The new German Approach
Details
IV. The Federal Constitutional Court’s Approach and the Hanan-Case
Details
E. Summary
Details
Bibliography
Details
307–310
List of Authors
307–310
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Access
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights , page 1 - 10
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
Autoren
Stephanie Schiedermair (Ed.)
Alexander Schwarz (Ed.)
Dominik Steiger (Ed.)
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748923503-1
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-7966-6
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2350-3
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748923503-1
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
