Jump to content
The Rings of Resilience Model / 1. Chapter: Research Question & Approach
The Rings of Resilience Model / 1. Chapter: Research Question & Approach
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–24
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–24
Details
25–42
1. Chapter: Research Question & Approach
25–42
Details
1.1. Description of the Problem
Immediacy
New reach
Social relevance
1.2. Approach Strategic Resilience
Credibility of deterrence
Strategic Resilience as a credible deterrent
The Security Policy Vulnerability Paradox
The Security Communicative Vulnerability Paradox
Security Psychological Vulnerability Paradox
1.3. Research Questions
43–46
2. Chapter: Methodological Approach & Case Selection Rationale
43–46
Details
47–68
3. Chapter: Definitions and Limitations
47–68
Details
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Definitions
3.2.1. Terrorism
3.2.2. Jihadi Terrorism
Violence as a mandated, legitimate instrument for political change
Strong commitment to violence against civilians
Compelling narrative with absolute distinction between the believer and non-believers
Concept of Paradisiology
3.2.3. Resilience
Resilience as a genetic disposition
Resilience of Critical Infrastructure
3.2.4. Strategic Resilience
3.3. Limitations
69–146
4. Chapter: Theories and Models
69–146
Details
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Identification and Selection
4.3. Analysis
4.3.1. Model of Global and Situational Meaning
Relevance
Meaning-Making Coping stage
4.3.2. Just-World-Beliefs Theory
Relevance:
4.3.3. Logo Theory [Existential Analytic Theory of Meaning]
Relevance:
4.3.4. Terror Management Theory
Relevance:
The development and clinging to exaggerated nationalistic beliefs:
The support for aggression against people supporting opposing opinions:
4.3.5. Dynamic of Reciprocal Threat Perception
Relevance:
4.3.6. Appraisal Tendency Theory
Relevance:
4.3.7. Mass-Mediated-Terrorism Concept
→Terrorists to Mass Media (A)
→Media to Public (B)
→Authorities to Media (C)
→Authorities to Public (D)
Relevance:
4.3.8. The Robespierre Affect
Relevance:
4.3.9. Emotional Contagion / Social Influence Theory
Emotional Comparison
Emotional Contagion.
Relevance:
4.3.10. Affiliation Theory
Relevance:
4.3.11. Conservation of Resources Model
Relevance:
4.3.12. Social Support Deterioration Deterrence Model
Relevance:
4.4. Chapter Conclusion
147–188
5. Chapter: Analysis and Conclusion
147–188
Details
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Identification and Categorisation of Measures
5.3. Nine Critical Tasks
One: Coping Friendly Meaning Making
Two: Ensure Cognitive Clarity
Three: Management of Fear
Four: Raise Individual and Organisational Self-Efficacy
Five: Impact Prevention and Reduction
Six: Strengthen Emotion-Focused Coping Skills
Seven: Limit Indirect (Psychological) Impact
Eight: Strengthen Societal Cohesion
Nine: Provide Dedicated Support to Directly Affected
5.4. Priority Tasking in Different Crisis Phases
The Mitigation and Preparedness Phase
The Response Phase
The Recovery and Coping Phase
5.5. Rings of Resilience Model
5.6. Measures
5.6.1. Task and measures during the Mitigation and Preparedness Phase
5.6.2. Tasks and measures during the Response Phase
5.6.3. Tasks and measures through the Recovery and Coping Phase
189–256
6. Chapter: First Case – The United Kingdom
189–256
Details
6.1. Introduction
6.2. The United Kingdom’s Approach to Counter-Terrorism
6.2.1. ACT: Action Counters Terrorism
Identify and Respond to Suspicious Behaviour or Items
6.2.2. ACT: RUN, HIDE, TELL – How to respond to a Firearms or Weapons Attack
Noteworthy Adaptation #1: The ABTA – Stay Safe Abroad Campaign:
Noteworthy Adaptation #2: The Sun Campaign:
6.2.3. Project Servator
6.2.4. ACT Awareness: Identify and Respond to Suspicious Behaviour or Items
6.2.5. ACT Strategic (formerly known as Project Argus)
6.2.6. Cross-Sectoral Security Communications (CSSC)
6.2.7. Step-Change Initiative
6.2.8. CTP Information Sharing Platform
6.2.9. Crowded Places Programme
6.2.10. Loss Mitigation Credit (LMC)
6.2.11. National Stakeholder Menu of Tactical Options
6.2.12. The City Security Council
6.2.13. Secured-by-Design
6.2.14. Protective Security Management Systems
6.2.15. ‘Increasing Crowd Resilience’ (ICR) Programme
6.2.16. citizenAID RUN-HIDE-TELL-TREAT
6.2.17. Local Resilience Forum
6.2.18. Non-Damage Business Interruption Coverage
6.2.19. Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme
6.2.20. Victim Support
6.3. UK Case Study Conclusion
257–338
7. Chapter: Second Case – The Republic of Singapore
257–338
Details
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Singapore’s Counter-Terrorism Approach
7.3. Singapore Community Programmes
7.3.1. Training and Engagement
7.3.1.1. SGSecure Movement
Vigilance
Cohesion
Resilience
7.3.1.2. SGSecure Media Cluster
7.3.1.3. SGSecure Community Network
7.3.1.4. SCDF Community Emergency Preparedness Programme
7.3.1.5. SCDF-PA Civil Defence Ready Homes Programme
7.3.1.6. SCDF Emergency Preparedness Centre
7.3.1.7. The Singapore Discovery Centre
7.3.2. Volunteering
7.3.2.1. Volunteer Special Constabulary – Police Officer Scheme
7.3.2.2. Volunteer Special Constabulary – Community Officer Scheme
7.3.2.3. Neighbourhood Watch Zone Liaison Officer Scheme
7.3.2.4. Civil Defence Auxiliary Unit Officer Scheme
7.3.2.5. Emergency Preparedness Programme
7.3.2.6. Save-A- Life/Community First Responder Programme
7.3.2.7. Citizens on Patrol Programme
7.3.2.8. Riders on Watch (ROW) Volunteer Scheme
7.3.2.9. Silver Watch Group Ambassador Programme
7.3.2.10. Community Engagement Programme
7.3.2.11. Inter-Racial and Religious Confidence Circles
7.4. Singapore School Programmes
7.4.1. Teaching and Engagement
7.4.1.1. National Education
7.4.1.2. Heritage Education Programmes
7.4.1.3. Total Defence Social Studies Syllabus
7.4.2. Volunteering
7.4.2.1. National Civil Defence Cadet Corps Programme
7.4.2.2. Civil Defence Lionhearters Club (Post-secondary Schools)
7.4.2.3. Junior Civil Defence Lionhearter Programme (Primary schools)
7.5. Singapore Private Sector Programmes
7.5.1. Training and Engagement
7.5.1.1. SGSecure@Workplaces Programme
7.5.1.2. Project Guardian Scheme
7.5.1.3. Security-By-Design – Guidelines for Enhancing Building Security in Singapore
7.5.2. Volunteering
7.5.2.1. SCDF Corporate Safety & Security Programme
7.5.2.2. Safety and Security Watch Group Scheme
7.5.2.3. Corporate First Responder Scheme
7.5.2.4. Industry Safety and Security Watch Group Scheme
7.6. Singapore Victim Support
7.7. Singapore Legal instruments
Internal Security Act
Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act
Administration of Muslim Law Act Section 87
Public Order and Safety (Special Powers) Act
Singapore Armed Forces Amendment Act
The Infrastructure Protection Act
7.8. Singapore Case Study Conclusion
339–348
8. Chapter: Cross-Case Comparison and Conclusion
339–348
Details
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Assessment
8.3. Case Study Conclusion
349–372
9. Chapter: Synopsis
349–372
Details
Coping-Friendly Meaning Making
Ensure Cognitive Clarity
Management of Fear
Raise Individual and Organisational Self-Efficacy
Impact Prevention and Reduction
Strengthen Emotion-Focused coping skills
Limit Indirect (Psychological) Impact
Strengthen Societal Cohesion
Provide Dedicated Support to Directly Affected
Mitigation and Preparedness Phase
Response Phase
Recovery and Coping Phase
9.1. Implications for Academia
9.2. Implications for Practitioners
373–411
References
373–411
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
The Rings of Resilience Model , page 25 - 42
1. Chapter: Research Question & Approach
Autoren
Adrian J. Neumann
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748915942-25
ISBN print: 978-3-7560-0846-9
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-1594-2
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748915942-25
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
