Formal and Informal Circulation of Cross-Border Evidence in Europe and Possible Improvements: Toward an “Annex E” of the European Investigation Order?

Michele Panzavolta

doi:10.5771/2193-5505-2024-2-191

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- 129–130 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 129–130
- 131–134 Guest Editorial 131–134
- 135–239 Articles 135–239
  - 135–147 The Concept of an Effective Remedy Under Article 47 of the Charter in Context of the European Investigation Order Sławomir Steinborn Sławomir Steinborn 135–147
  - 148–176 Judicial Protection in EU Cross-Border Evidence-Gathering: the EIO as a Case Anna Mosna Anna Mosna 148–176
  - 177–190 Scope of Judicial Review in the Executing State in EIO Proceedings Marcello Daniele Marcello Daniele 177–190
  - 191–212 Formal and Informal Circulation of Cross-Border Evidence in Europe and Possible Improvements: Toward an “Annex E” of the European Investigation Order? Michele Panzavolta Michele Panzavolta 191–212
  - 213–225 Obtaining and Assessing Evidence From the Hearing of a Minor Victim under the European Investigation Order – Selected Problematic Issues Marta Flis-Świeczkowska, Dawid Świeczkowski Marta Flis-Świeczkowska, Dawid Świeczkowski 213–225
  - 226–239 Gathering of Evidence by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office In Cross-border Investigations – Some Reflections from a Polish Perspective Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek 226–239
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Vollzugriff

EuCLR European Criminal Law Review , Seite 191 - 212

Formal and Informal Circulation of Cross-Border Evidence in Europe and Possible Improvements: Toward an “Annex E” of the European Investigation Order?

Autoren

Michele Panzavolta

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2024-2-191
- ISSN print: 2191-7442
- ISSN online: 2193-5505
Abstract

The present article discusses possible improvements in the field of circulation of cross-border evidence in Europe. It begins with an overview of the developments of the different channels for evidence circulation, by differentiating informal sharing of evidence from formal exchanges. It then discusses the many features of these two categories, with a view to identify shortcomings and incoherences. On the basis of these shortcomings, suggestions for improvements are put forward. The main proposal of this paper is to introduce in the European Investigation Order (EIO) a new form – annex E – for transmitting the requested evidence to the issuing State. It is argued that such a form would help clarify the formal nature of the exchange of evidence that takes places with the EIO and that it would be conducive to a better mutual trust and to a greater protection for fundamental rights at the moment of assessing evidence in the issuing State.
Teilen