Consequences of administrative silence in public administration

Mirlinda Batalli

doi:10.5771/1435-2869-2017-1-139

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 3–4 Editorial 3–4
- 5–20 The basic characteristics of the information technology sector in Serbia Dalibor Miletić, Anka Vojvodić, Marko Vojvodić Dalibor Miletić, Anka Vojvodić, Marko Vojvodić 5–20
- 21–30 Brexit – Implications for south-east European countries Ela Golemi Ela Golemi 21–30
- 31–48 Challenges and impacts of the digital transformation of society in the social sphere Miodrag Komarčević, Milovan Dimić, Petar Čelik Miodrag Komarčević, Milovan Dimić, Petar Čelik 31–48
- 49–84 Labour market transitions of young women and men in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Nikica Mojsoska-Blazevski Nikica Mojsoska-Blazevski 49–84
- 85–100 The impact of economic growth on inflation and unemployment in Bulgaria, 2006-2016Lyuboslav Kostov 85–100
- 101–116 Erosion of self-management – a Yugoslav factory in post-socialist transition Kathrin Jurkat Kathrin Jurkat 101–116
- 117–138 Incorporation of international human rights into national legislation: The case of Kosovo Remzije Istrefi, Iliriana Islami Remzije Istrefi, Iliriana Islami 117–138
- 139–152 Consequences of administrative silence in public administration Mirlinda Batalli Mirlinda Batalli 139–152
- 153–154 About the Authors 153–154
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe , page 139 - 152

Consequences of administrative silence in public administration

Autoren

Mirlinda Batalli

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/1435-2869-2017-1-139
- ISSN: 1435-2869
- ISSN online: 2942-3384
Abstract

This article reviews the problem of administrative silence that has significant negative consequences regarding the administration and fulfilment of the basic principles of administrative procedures related to citizens’ rights. The article highlights the situation of when a citizen or legal entity has filed a submission with an administrative body, which has then not issued an administrative act within a reasonable time. The article raises questions of the consequences and legal effects of administrative silence and the legal instruments required to protect citizens’ rights in such cases. The article begins with the completion of administrative procedure as provided by the respective rules, continues with a treatment of the consequences of administrative silence and concludes on the legal instruments protecting citizens’ rights. This article comments that, in most EU countries, ‘fictitious decisions’ are more often chosen as a solution to administrative silence, given the influence of international obligations such as EU directives, OECD reports and other relevant international instruments.
Share