Die deutsche EU-Ratspräsidentschaft 2020: selektive Föderalisierung des Integrationsprozesses

Katrin Böttger; Mathias Jopp

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2021-1-3

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 1–2 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1–2
- 3–70 AUFSÄTZE 3–70
  - 3–22 Die deutsche EU-Ratspräsidentschaft 2020: selektive Föderalisierung des Integrationsprozesses Katrin Böttger, Mathias Jopp Katrin Böttger, Mathias Jopp 3–22
  - 23–39 Zur Einführung einer Rechtsstaatskonditionalität in der Europäischen Union: die Corona-Krise als „Window of Opportunity“ Ellen Bos, Kristina Kurze Ellen Bos, Kristina Kurze 23–39
  - 40–52 Das neue EU-Migrations- und Asylpaket: Wird es zu mehr Solidarität zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten führen? Florian Trauner Florian Trauner 40–52
  - 53–70 2020 als Stresstest für die Europäische Union: Herausforderungen in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie Vittoria Meißner, Juha Jokela, Funda Tekin, Niklas Helwig, Marco Siddi, Tyyne Karjalainen Vittoria Meißner, Juha Jokela, Funda Tekin, Niklas Helwig, Marco Siddi, Tyyne Karjalainen 53–70
- 71–78 FORUM 71–78
  - Die portugiesische EU-Ratspräsidentschaft: Budget, Brexit, Biden und andere Herausforderungen Minna Ålander Minna Ålander
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Access

integration , page 3 - 22

Die deutsche EU-Ratspräsidentschaft 2020: selektive Föderalisierung des Integrationsprozesses

Autoren

Katrin Böttger Mathias Jopp

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2021-1-3
- ISSN: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

This article analyses the most important issues and decisions of the German EU Council Presidency, but also its “leftovers”. Almost beyond expectations, the German Government proved to be a successful mediator and honest broker for viable compromises in a number of conflicting areas. It was possible, in the second half of 2020, to resolve basic EU financing issues for the next seven years period, prevent a no-deal Brexit through a trade agreement with the United Kingdom, conclude an investment agreement with China and achieve the adoption of a rule of law mechanism against corruption in the use of EU funds by national actors. During the German Presidency, once again in European integration, a centralization of important tasks at the Brussels level can be identified, combined with a partial strengthening of supranational institutions.

Abstract

This article analyses the most important issues and decisions of the German EU Council Presidency, but also its “leftovers”. Almost beyond expectations, the German Government proved to be a successful mediator and honest broker for viable compromises in a number of conflicting areas. It was possible, in the second half of 2020, to resolve basic EU financing issues for the next seven years period, prevent a no-deal Brexit through a trade agreement with the United Kingdom, conclude an investment agreement with China and achieve the adoption of a rule of law mechanism against corruption in the use of EU funds by national actors. During the German Presidency, once again in European integration, a centralization of important tasks at the Brussels level can be identified, combined with a partial strengthening of supranational institutions.
Share