Die Europäische Säule sozialer Rechte: Nutzung und Nutzen

Björn Hacker

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2018-4-259

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 257–258 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 257–258
- 259–316 AUFSÄTZE 259–316
  - 259–272 Die Europäische Säule sozialer Rechte: Nutzung und Nutzen Björn Hacker Björn Hacker 259–272
  - 273–292 Parteipositionen zur Vertiefung der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion im 19. Deutschen Bundestag Andreas Wimmel Andreas Wimmel 273–292
  - 293–300 Reformoptionen und Zielkonflikte in der Asyl- und Flüchtlingspolitik der Europäischen Union Stefanie Schmahl Stefanie Schmahl 293–300
  - 301–316 Extern induzierter Wandel im Südkaukasus – zur Konzeptionalisierung von Europäisierung in einer heterogenen Region Olaf Leiße Olaf Leiße 301–316
- 317–336 WIEDERABDRUCK 317–336
  - Integration – gestern, heute und morgen Heinrich Schneider Heinrich Schneider
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

integration , page 259 - 272

Die Europäische Säule sozialer Rechte: Nutzung und Nutzen

Autoren

Björn Hacker

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2018-4-259
- ISSN: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Abstract

It was for the European Semester 2017/2018 that the European Commission included the European Pillar of Social Rights for the first time after its proclamation. In this framework, the Social Scoreboard, which accompanies the pillar, has the potential to outline social problems across the EU. However, this potential is not fully exploited. The member states are reluctant to use it. Budgetary objectives as well as those related to increasing the member states’ economic competitiveness are dominating social objectives. Only if social objectives are in line with the aims of economic coordination, they have a chance to be included into reform recommendations. To achieve the “social ‘triple A’ rating” (Jean-Claude Juncker), the aims set out in the pillar as well as the process of coordination in social policy need to become more binding.

Zusammenfassung

It was for the European Semester 2017/2018 that the European Commission included the European Pillar of Social Rights for the first time after its proclamation. In this framework, the Social Scoreboard, which accompanies the pillar, has the potential to outline social problems across the EU. However, this potential is not fully exploited. The member states are reluctant to use it. Budgetary objectives as well as those related to increasing the member states’ economic competitiveness are dominating social objectives. Only if social objectives are in line with the aims of economic coordination, they have a chance to be included into reform recommendations. To achieve the “social ‘triple A’ rating” (Jean-Claude Juncker), the aims set out in the pillar as well as the process of coordination in social policy need to become more binding.
Share