Mitgliedstaatliche Gestaltungsspielräume im Schengener Grenzkodex – Folgen für einen Raum ohne Kontrollen an Binnengrenzen

Jonas Bornemann

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2018-3-194

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 179–240 AUFSÄTZE 179–240
  - 179–193 Der nächste mehrjährige Finanzrahmen der EU – die schwierige Balance von Einheitlichkeit und Flexibilität Peter Becker Peter Becker 179–193
  - 194–209 Mitgliedstaatliche Gestaltungsspielräume im Schengener Grenzkodex – Folgen für einen Raum ohne Kontrollen an Binnengrenzen Jonas Bornemann Jonas Bornemann 194–209
  - 210–227 Europa im Parteienwettstreit in den Ausschüssen des Bundesrates Antonios Souris Antonios Souris 210–227
  - 228–240 Flexible Integration und Compliance – Lehren aus der Energiegemeinschaft Anne Wetzel Anne Wetzel 228–240
- 241–244 TAGUNGEN 241–244
  - Potenziale für eine vertiefte Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Europäischen Union und der Ukraine Matthias Meier, Ljudmyla Melnyk Matthias Meier, Ljudmyla Melnyk
- 245–255 ARBEITSKREIS EUROPÄISCHE INTEGRATION 245–255
  - Erkenntnisse zur Gestaltung gemeinsamer Fiskalpolitik in Europa Sebastian Blesse Sebastian Blesse
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Access

integration , page 194 - 209

Mitgliedstaatliche Gestaltungsspielräume im Schengener Grenzkodex – Folgen für einen Raum ohne Kontrollen an Binnengrenzen

Autoren

Jonas Bornemann

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2018-3-194
- ISSN: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

Following the so-called refugee crisis, several Schengen states opted for the reintroduction of border controls. The mere fact that such checks were not just appropriate but equally lawful was beyond doubt when the new German federal government took office. Notably, however, the European Parliament disagrees. It argues that continuous prolongation of such checks would amount to the abolition of the Schengen area altogether. How do these divergent conceptions come about? Which margins of discretion do member states possess in order to reintroduce border controls in line with European Union law? With a view to the evolution of the Schengen regime, this contribution explores the tensions between member states’ sovereign choice to reintroduce border controls and the legal framework established by the Schengen acquis, which aims at the abolition of such checks.

Abstract

Following the so-called refugee crisis, several Schengen states opted for the reintroduction of border controls. The mere fact that such checks were not just appropriate but equally lawful was beyond doubt when the new German federal government took office. Notably, however, the European Parliament disagrees. It argues that continuous prolongation of such checks would amount to the abolition of the Schengen area altogether. How do these divergent conceptions come about? Which margins of discretion do member states possess in order to reintroduce border controls in line with European Union law? With a view to the evolution of the Schengen regime, this contribution explores the tensions between member states’ sovereign choice to reintroduce border controls and the legal framework established by the Schengen acquis, which aims at the abolition of such checks.
Share