Die Kraft der Krise – die europäische Kohäsionspolitik und ihre Reform

Peter Becker; Ronny Müller

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2015-3-231

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 191–192 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 191–192
- 193–247 AUFSÄTZE 193–247
  - 193–203 EU-Erweiterungspolitik – Stabilitätsanker oder enttäuschte Hoffnung? Wie wir die Dynamik des Erweiterungsprozesses bewahren Michael Roth Michael Roth 193–203
  - 204–213 Die EU-Russland-Beziehungen: Rückblick und Ausblick im Zeichen der Ukraine-Krise Katrin Böttger Katrin Böttger 204–213
  - 214–230 Die Europäische Union als (Liberalisierungs-)Akteur in der Welthandelsorganisation – Erfolge und Zwänge Eva Mareike Schmitt, David Kabus Eva Mareike Schmitt, David Kabus 214–230
  - 231–247 Die Kraft der Krise – die europäische Kohäsionspolitik und ihre Reform Peter Becker, Ronny Müller Peter Becker, Ronny Müller 231–247
- 248–257 TAGUNGEN 248–257
  - Neue Herausforderungen nach der Krise – das dritte Deutsch-Portugiesische Forum zieht Bilanz Yvonne Braun, Tobias Herbst, Julian Plottka, Richard Steinberg Yvonne Braun, Tobias Herbst, Julian Plottka, Richard Steinberg
- 258–270 ARBEITSKREIS EUROPÄISCHE INTEGRATION 258–270
  - TAGUNG
- 271–274 Abstract 271–274
  - ABSTRACTS
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

integration , page 231 - 247

Die Kraft der Krise – die europäische Kohäsionspolitik und ihre Reform

Autoren

Peter Becker Ronny Müller

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2015-3-231
- ISSN: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

The deep crisis in the euro zone influenced the recent reform of European cohesion policy for the funding period 2014-2020. The policy has to obey the constraints of tight budgets. The Commission reacted to this challenge by implementing new instruments to increase efficiency and effectiveness. This was accompanied by a double change of meaning and function: (1) having been the traditional policy of multi-level governance in the European Union, in which the role of member states has been limited by the Commission and the regions, the reformed policy today shows slow centralisation tendencies and, consequently, a strengthening of the EU institutions at the expense of room to manoeuvre for the regions. (2) The European Structural Funds seem to become more and more the financial instrument to pursue the European economic and employment policy objectives; the classical cohesion and convergence objectives increasingly are being replaced by the objectives of the European growth and jobs strategy, Europe 2020.

Abstract

The deep crisis in the euro zone influenced the recent reform of European cohesion policy for the funding period 2014-2020. The policy has to obey the constraints of tight budgets. The Commission reacted to this challenge by implementing new instruments to increase efficiency and effectiveness. This was accompanied by a double change of meaning and function: (1) having been the traditional policy of multi-level governance in the European Union, in which the role of member states has been limited by the Commission and the regions, the reformed policy today shows slow centralisation tendencies and, consequently, a strengthening of the EU institutions at the expense of room to manoeuvre for the regions. (2) The European Structural Funds seem to become more and more the financial instrument to pursue the European economic and employment policy objectives; the classical cohesion and convergence objectives increasingly are being replaced by the objectives of the European growth and jobs strategy, Europe 2020.
Share