Multilateralismus minus eins?

Caroline Fehl; Johannes Thimm

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2017-3-48

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–47 THEMENSCHWERPUNKT 1–47
  - 1–7 Effizienz ist wichtig – Verteilung auch! Die negativen Polarisierungsfolgen der Globalisierung Thomas Straubhaar Thomas Straubhaar 1–7
  - 8–12 America First: Power and Geopolitics in US Trade Policy under President Trump Holger Janusch, Witold Mucha Holger Janusch, Witold Mucha 8–12
  - 13–18 Der Preis der Pax Americana Josef Braml Josef Braml 13–18
  - 19–26 Freihandel als Funktion des Politischen: PACER Plus und australische Sicherheitsinteressen Andreas Holtz Andreas Holtz 19–26
  - 27–31 Raw Materials and International Relations Raimund Bleischwitz, Rüya Perincek Raimund Bleischwitz, Rüya Perincek 27–31
  - 32–36 Französische Rohstoffpolitik im Zeichen der Souveränität Yann Wernert Yann Wernert 32–36
  - 37–41 CPEC: One Potentially Treacherous Road in China’s Grand Plan? Shah Meer Baloch Shah Meer Baloch 37–41
  - 42–47 China’s Approach to Regional Free Trade Frameworks in the Asia Pacific: RCEP as a Prime Example of Economic Diplomacy? David Groten David Groten 42–47
- 48–52 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 48–52
  - Multilateralismus minus eins? Caroline Fehl, Johannes Thimm Caroline Fehl, Johannes Thimm
- 53–55 DOKUMENTATION 53–55
  - Das Zweiprozentziel gehört auf den Prüfstand
- 56–57 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 56–57
- 57–60 BESPRECHUNGEN 57–60
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 48 - 52

Multilateralismus minus eins?

Autoren

Caroline Fehl Johannes Thimm

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2017-3-48
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

The unilateralist policies of US President Trump pose a challenge to supporters of global multilateral cooperation - but one that is not entirely unparalleled. Not for the first time in history, European and other governments are faced with the question of how and under what conditions a “multilateralism minus one” can be realized. Accordingly, International Relations scholars have long debated the possibility and effectiveness of “non-hegemonic cooperation”. In this article, we draw on these previous analyses to shed light on what states supportive of multilateralism could and should do to advance global governance in areas such as UN peacekeeping, arms control, and climate policy.

Abstract

The unilateralist policies of US President Trump pose a challenge to supporters of global multilateral cooperation - but one that is not entirely unparalleled. Not for the first time in history, European and other governments are faced with the question of how and under what conditions a “multilateralism minus one” can be realized. Accordingly, International Relations scholars have long debated the possibility and effectiveness of “non-hegemonic cooperation”. In this article, we draw on these previous analyses to shed light on what states supportive of multilateralism could and should do to advance global governance in areas such as UN peacekeeping, arms control, and climate policy.
Share