Two Birds, One Stone – War-to-Democracy Processes after Ethnic Conflicts

Felix Schulte

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2017-1-34

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–28 TH EMENS CHWE R PUNK T 1–28
  - 1–6 NATO: Warschauer Gipfel-Highlights und die Rückkehr der nuklearen Abschreckung Wolfgang Schwarz Wolfgang Schwarz 1–6
  - 7–12 The Military Contribution to the Prevention of Violent Conflict Thomas Boehlke, Edward Canfor-Dumas Thomas Boehlke, Edward Canfor-Dumas 7–12
  - 13–18 Entspannung braucht Abschreckung – Abschreckung braucht Entspannung Claudia Major, Christian Mölling Claudia Major, Christian Mölling 13–18
  - 19–24 Euroatlantische Partnerschaft: entbehrlich, notwendig, möglich? Die NATO und Russland – vorwärts in die Vergangenheit Hans-Joachim Giessmann Hans-Joachim Giessmann 19–24
  - 25–28 Apocalypse Now? Die NATO und ihr schwieriger Weg in die Zukunft. Ein Essay Werner Sonne Werner Sonne 25–28
- 29–45 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 29–45
  - 29–33 Der sogenannte „Islamische Staat“ und seine asymmetrischen Taktiken gegen westliche Demokratien Stefan Goertz Stefan Goertz 29–33
  - 34–45 Two Birds, One Stone – War-to-Democracy Processes after Ethnic Conflicts Felix Schulte Felix Schulte 34–45
- 46–46 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 46–46
- 47–51 BESPRECHUNGEN 47–51
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Vollzugriff

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , Seite 34 - 45

Two Birds, One Stone – War-to-Democracy Processes after Ethnic Conflicts

Autoren

Felix Schulte

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2017-1-34
- ISSN print: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Abstract

Ethnic conflicts continue to be the most common form of intrastate conflict. The international community makes efforts to transform war-torn societies into peaceful democracies, often overlooking that building peace can conflict with building democracy, and vice versa. Using findings of the rich literature of Institutional Engineering, this article aims to identify the institutions which have led to successful war-to-democracy processes after ethnic conflict. It is argued that institutions are most suitable if they provide for self-determination rights, cooperation and the diffusion of power. War-to-democracy processes are analyzed in 13 conflict cases worldwide between 1994 and 2016 with the help of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Results show that the inclusion of groups is the decisive key. The article contributes to ongoing discussions about which type of institutional design is best suited to achieve the twin goals of sustainable peace and durable democracy after ethnic conflict.
Teilen