Entspannung braucht Abschreckung – Abschreckung braucht Entspannung

Claudia Major; Christian Mölling

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2017-1-13

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–28 TH EMENS CHWE R PUNK T 1–28
  - 1–6 NATO: Warschauer Gipfel-Highlights und die Rückkehr der nuklearen Abschreckung Wolfgang Schwarz Wolfgang Schwarz 1–6
  - 7–12 The Military Contribution to the Prevention of Violent Conflict Thomas Boehlke, Edward Canfor-Dumas Thomas Boehlke, Edward Canfor-Dumas 7–12
  - 13–18 Entspannung braucht Abschreckung – Abschreckung braucht Entspannung Claudia Major, Christian Mölling Claudia Major, Christian Mölling 13–18
  - 19–24 Euroatlantische Partnerschaft: entbehrlich, notwendig, möglich? Die NATO und Russland – vorwärts in die Vergangenheit Hans-Joachim Giessmann Hans-Joachim Giessmann 19–24
  - 25–28 Apocalypse Now? Die NATO und ihr schwieriger Weg in die Zukunft. Ein Essay Werner Sonne Werner Sonne 25–28
- 29–45 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 29–45
  - 29–33 Der sogenannte „Islamische Staat“ und seine asymmetrischen Taktiken gegen westliche Demokratien Stefan Goertz Stefan Goertz 29–33
  - 34–45 Two Birds, One Stone – War-to-Democracy Processes after Ethnic Conflicts Felix Schulte Felix Schulte 34–45
- 46–46 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 46–46
- 47–51 BESPRECHUNGEN 47–51
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 13 - 18

Entspannung braucht Abschreckung – Abschreckung braucht Entspannung

Autoren

Claudia Major Christian Mölling

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2017-1-13
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

Deterrence and Détente have again come to the forefront of NATO’s agenda. As a response to Russia’s forced annexation of Crimea and destabilization of the Ukraine, NATO decided already at its 2014 Summit in Wales to rebalance its tasks, giving renewed attention to deterrence. The 2016 NATO Summit saw a return to the twin approach of Harmel: to link deterrence and dialogue. Until today, western states act along traditional lines: they strengthen conventional capabilities for deterrence and aim to revitalize conventional arms control. However, to achieve more security through the Harmel approach from Cold War times, three conditions would need to be met: a) both pillars, deterrence and dialogue have to be adapted to a new security environment, b) to from a coherent approach, initiatives in the two pillars have to be actively coordinated in reference to each other and among NATO-allies, c) Russia would need to return to the dialogue.

Abstract

Deterrence and Détente have again come to the forefront of NATO’s agenda. As a response to Russia’s forced annexation of Crimea and destabilization of the Ukraine, NATO decided already at its 2014 Summit in Wales to rebalance its tasks, giving renewed attention to deterrence. The 2016 NATO Summit saw a return to the twin approach of Harmel: to link deterrence and dialogue. Until today, western states act along traditional lines: they strengthen conventional capabilities for deterrence and aim to revitalize conventional arms control. However, to achieve more security through the Harmel approach from Cold War times, three conditions would need to be met: a) both pillars, deterrence and dialogue have to be adapted to a new security environment, b) to from a coherent approach, initiatives in the two pillars have to be actively coordinated in reference to each other and among NATO-allies, c) Russia would need to return to the dialogue.
Share