Die Verfassung als Maßstab, die Nichtbeachtung des VerfGHG – das Urteil des polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 9. März 2016

Szymon Pawłowski

doi:10.5771/0030-6444-2018-1-39

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 1–2 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1–2
- 3–4 EDITORIAL 3–4
- 5–104 AUFSÄTZE 5–104
  - 5–20 Der Streit um den Verfassungsgerichtshof in Polen 2015-2016 Piotr Czarny Piotr Czarny 5–20
  - 21–38 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Die Auseinandersetzung um den Verfassungsgerichtshof in Polen (2015-2016) Andrzej Dziadzio Andrzej Dziadzio 21–38
  - 39–49 Die Verfassung als Maßstab, die Nichtbeachtung des VerfGHG – das Urteil des polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 9. März 2016 Szymon Pawłowski Szymon Pawłowski 39–49
  - 50–64 Medienfreiheit in Polen Tina de Vries Tina de Vries 50–64
  - 65–89 Leistungsverwaltung in Russland – das System der staatlichen und kommunalen Dienstleistungserbringung Julian-Ivan Beriger Julian-Ivan Beriger 65–89
  - 90–104 Mediation als Appropriate Dispute Resolution im tschechischen und slowakischen Rechtssystem Michal Malacka Michal Malacka 90–104
- 105–106 AUS DER FORSCHUNG 105–106
  - Bogusław Banaszak – ein Nachruf Rainer Arnold Rainer Arnold
- 107–123 AUS DEM SCHRIFTTUM 107–123
- 124–130 AUS JUSTIZ UND RECHTSPRECHUNG IN OSTEUROPA 124–130
- 131–135 AUS DER RECHTSPRECHUNG DES EGMR 131–135
- 136–138 ABSTRACTS 136–138
- 139–140 AUTOREN 139–140
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Access

OER Osteuropa Recht , page 39 - 49

Die Verfassung als Maßstab, die Nichtbeachtung des VerfGHG – das Urteil des polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 9. März 2016

Autoren

Szymon Pawłowski

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2018-1-39
- ISSN: 0030-6444
- ISSN online: 2366-6730
Abstract

The article analyzes the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Poland, in which the court decided directly based upon the constitution instead of the provisions of the act governing the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. This problem was first subject of a broader consideration of the Constitutional Court, in its judgment of March 9, 2016 (K 47/15).The Constitutional Court indicated that there may be decision-making powers on the basis of the rules to be examined (judicial decisions paradox). It has determined that there are compelling reasons in this case for disregarding the provisions of the act in question. Thus, the Constitutional Court withdrew from the so far leading opinion, that its proceedings are governed necessarily by the procedural Constitutional Court act in force. The issue of disregarding the application of the procedural Constitutional Court act must be subject to further discussion, as neither former court practice nor academic discourse exist to support this approach of the Constitutional Court.

Zusammenfassung

The article analyzes the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Poland, in which the court decided directly based upon the constitution instead of the provisions of the act governing the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. This problem was first subject of a broader consideration of the Constitutional Court, in its judgment of March 9, 2016 (K 47/15).The Constitutional Court indicated that there may be decision-making powers on the basis of the rules to be examined (judicial decisions paradox). It has determined that there are compelling reasons in this case for disregarding the provisions of the act in question. Thus, the Constitutional Court withdrew from the so far leading opinion, that its proceedings are governed necessarily by the procedural Constitutional Court act in force. The issue of disregarding the application of the procedural Constitutional Court act must be subject to further discussion, as neither former court practice nor academic discourse exist to support this approach of the Constitutional Court.
Share