Jump to content
Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights / III. Principles of Scientific Method and Case Analysis
Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights / III. Principles of Scientific Method and Case Analysis
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–14
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–14
Details
15–16
Introduction
15–16
Details
17–74
I. Facts and Rules of Evidence in the Sphere of International Adjudication
17–74
Details
1. What Are Facts?
Details
2. Particularities of the International Sphere
Details
a. Fragmentation
Details
b. International Law and Domestic Law
Details
c. Multi-Perspectivity and Agenda-Setting
Details
3. Defining Fact-Assessment
Details
4. Goals of International Fact-Assessment
Details
a. Ascertaining ‘the Truth’?
Details
b. Other (Potentially Competing) Goals
Details
c. Truth Founded on Evidence
Details
5. Rules of Evidence in International Adjudication
Details
a. The Powers of International Courts and Tribunals Regarding Evidence
Details
i. Power to Order Parties to Produce Evidence
Details
ii. Power to Conduct Own Investigations
Details
iii. Power to Engage Experts
Details
b. Basic Concepts
Details
i. Admissibility of Evidence
Details
ii. The Burden of Proof
Details
iii. Standard of Proof
Details
(1) Prima Facie Evidence
Details
(2) Preponderance of Evidence
Details
(3) Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Details
6. The ECtHR’s Institutional Variations
Details
a. Applications Before the ECtHR
Details
b. Final Assessment of the Facts
Details
c. Rules on Fact-Assessment and Evidence Before the ECtHR
Details
d. Subsidiarity and Fact-Assessment
Details
7. Conclusion
Details
75–108
II. Facts, Law and Interdisciplinarity
75–108
Details
1. Interdisciplinarity and International Legal Theory
Details
2. Pragmatist Optimism towards Interdisciplinarity
Details
a. Pragmatism
Details
b. The First Step to Interdisciplinarity: Pragmatist Wariness of Dichotomies
Details
c. The Second Step to Interdisciplinarity: the Importance of Context to Inquiry
Details
3. Positivism’s Arguments against Interdisciplinarity
Details
4. The Blurred Line between the Factual and the Normative
Details
a. The Chicken or the Egg? – or the Wandering Gaze
Details
b. Adjudicative Facts and Legislative Facts
Details
c. The Intrinsic Link between Facts and Law before the ECtHR
Details
5. Conclusion
Details
109–176
III. Principles of Scientific Method and Case Analysis
109–176
Details
1. Principles of Scientific Method
Details
2. Analysis of the ECtHR’s Case-Law Using Principles of Scientific Method
Details
a. Simplicity
Details
i. The Principle
Details
ii. Case Analysis
Details
iii. Summary and Comment
Details
b. Explanatory Power and External Validity
Details
i. The Principles
Details
ii. Case Analysis
Details
iii. Summary and Comment
Details
c. Falsifiability
Details
i. The Principle
Details
ii. Case Analysis
Details
iii. Summary and Comment
Details
3. Implications of these New Categories
Details
a. Focusing on the Quality of the Fact-Assessment Procedure
Details
b. How Do These Categories Change the Critique of Jurisprudence?
Details
177–180
Conclusion
177–180
Details
181–186
List of Cases
181–186
Details
ECtHR Cases
Details
ICJ Cases
Details
WTO Cases
Details
Cases from Other Jurisdictions
Details
187–188
List of Legislation
187–188
Details
189–198
Bibliography
189–198
Details
199–201
List of Abbreviations
199–201
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights , page 109 - 176
III. Principles of Scientific Method and Case Analysis
Autoren
Alexandra Ellen Hansen
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748933229-109
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8985-6
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-3322-9
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748933229-109
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
