@article{2017:ltjen:zeiten_des,
title = {Zeiten des Aufruhrs: Die Vorwahlen zur US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2016 und der Vormarsch der Partei-Außenseiter},
year = {2017},
note = {The events of 2016 challenged several well-established theories about
the nature of U .S . presidential primary campaigns: that the party
itself would ultimately control the nomination process; that an
efficient campaign organization on the ground is extremely important;
and, finally, that candidates need to adhere to the ideological
orthodoxies of both parties, which, over time, had become increasingly
ideological . The primary campaigns in 2016 show how some of these
assumptions have become questionable . However, it is mostly the
Republican primary of 2016 that signals a departure from the
traditional ways of candidate selection . Finally, it is asked if both
the campaign of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders can be interpreted as
examples of genuine populist movements . The record is, again, mixed:
Whereas Trump truly deserves the populism label, Bernie Sanders’
campaign needs to be interpreted in a slightly different light .},
journal = {ZParl Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen},
pages = {271--286},
author = {Lütjen, Torben},
volume = {48},
number = {2}
}