@article{2017:jaberg:selbstrefl,
title = {Selbstreflexiver Frieden – selbstreflexive Sicherheit?},
year = {2017},
note = {Peace and security are more or less synonyms. This opinion is often
heard, but not true. Firstly, the history of concepts differs.
Secondly, their immanent grammar or logic works contrarily: Peace is a
social and inclusive idea that implies symmetrical patterns of
relation, whereas security is an asocial and exclusive idea that tends
to asymmetrical patterns of relation. Peace limits the ambitions of an
actor, security does not. Peace excludes, security includes violent
means as normal instruments. Therefore, people striving for peace will
develop another epistemic attitude than people struggling for
security. Usually, peace is more disposed to self-reflexivity than
security is. But peace can lose its reflexive character, especially
where it ends, whereas security can gain a reflexive moment,
especially where existential problems cannot be solved without it.
Nevertheless, the difference between both categories remains
important: Peace prepares the way to self-reflexivity much better than
security ever could.},
journal = {S&F Sicherheit und Frieden},
pages = {169--173},
author = {Jaberg, Sabine},
volume = {35},
number = {4}
}