Harmful Trademarks
Towards a New Understanding of Moral Bars in GCC Registration
Zusammenfassung
Zwischen 2013 und 2017 wurden rund 115 EU-Markenanmeldungen aus Gründen der Moral und der öffentlichen Ordnung abgelehnt. Im Golf-Kooperationsrat (GKR; sechs arabische und islamische Länder) deuten Anekdoten darauf hin, dass einige dieser Ablehnungen ausländische Bewerber verwirrt und kulturelle blinde Flecken hervorgehoben haben. In diesem Zusammenhang wird in dieser Arbeit untersucht, wie drei arabische Golfstaaten, deren Hauptgesetzgeber das islamische Recht ist und die große Auswanderergemeinschaften haben, ein moralisches Verbot der Markenregistrierung auferlegen. Die Autorin stellt Vergleiche mit westlichen Rechtsordnungen an und untersucht drei Hauptfragen: 1) In welchem Umfang werden unmoralische oder grenzüberschreitende Marken/Waren in konservativen islamischen Ländern, die Markenrecht in Übereinstimmung mit dem Scharia-Recht anwenden, registriert? 2) Durch welche Argumentation werden Entscheidungen in dieser Hinsicht gesteuert? 3) Kann ein Begriff des „Schadens“ unser Verständnis der Macht von Marken und damit die von den Ländern festgelegten moralischen Schwellenwerte verbessern?
Die Autorin ist Expertin für Innovation und IP-Vermarktung. Während ihres Master-Studiums im Bereich des Gewerblichen Rechtsschutzes und des Wettbewerbsrechts in München entdeckte sie ihre Leidenschaft für das Markenrecht. Sie strebt nun eine Karriere im Bereich Markenrecht in Großbritannien an.
Abstract
Between 2013-2017, around 115 EU trademark applications were rejected on morality and public order grounds. In the GCC (six Arab and Islamic countries), anecdotal evidence suggests some refusals have bemused foreign applicants and highlighted cultural blindspots. In this context, this work examines how three Arab Gulf states that have Islamic law as the main source of legislation and large expatriate communities, apply moral bars to trademark registration. It draws comparison with Western jurisdictions. Three main questions are explored: 1) To what extent do immoral or borderline trademarks/goods proceed to registration in conservative Islamic countries that apply trademark law in conformity with Shari’a law? 2) What reasoning is guiding decisions? 3) Can a concept of ‘harm’ improve our understanding of the power of trademarks and thus the moral thresholds that countries set?
The author is an innovation and IP commercialisation professional. She acquired a passion for trademark law while completing a Master of Laws in ‘Intellectual Property and Competition Law’ in Munich, Germany. She is now pursuing a career in trademark law in the UK.
Schlagworte
trademark law harmful trademarks trademark moral bars GCC registration new understanding morality and public order harm cultural norms Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) immoral trademarks- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenSeiten
- 11–14 Introduction 11–14
- 93–94 Conclusion 93–94
- 97–103 List of Works Cited 97–103
- Abdel-khalik J, ‘Disparaging Trademarks: Who Matters’ (2015) 20(2) Michigan Journal of Race and Law 288
- Alemanno A and Bonadio E, ‘Do you Mind my Smoking? Plain Packaging of Cigarettes under the TRIPS Agreement' (2011) J.Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 450, 462
- Baird S, ‘Moral Intervention in the Trademark Arena: Banning the Registration of Scandalous and Immoral Trademarks’ (1993) 83(5) Trademark Reporter 661
- Bonadio E, ‘Brands, Morality and Public Policy: Some Reflections on the Ban on Registration of Controversial Trademarks’ (2015) 19 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 43
- Bonadio E, ‘Bans and Restrictions on the Use of Trade Marks and Consumers’ Health’ (2014) 4 Intellectual Property Quarterly 326
- Bone RG,‘Hunting Goodwill: A History of the Concept of Goodwill in Trademark Law’ (2006) 86 Boston University Law Review 547
- Brown Jr. RS, ‘Advertising and the Public Interest: Legal Protection of Trade Symbols’ (1948) 57 Yale Law Journal 1165
- Carpenter M and Murphy K, ‘Calling Bullshit on the Lanham Act: The 2 (a) Bar for Immoral, Scandalous, and Disparaging Marks’(2010) 49 U. Louisville L. Rev. 465
- Cohen FS, ‘Dialogue on Private Property’ (1954), IX Rutgers Law Review 357
- Dar HA and Presley JR, ‘The Gulf Co-Operation Council: A Slow Path to Integration? ’ (2001) 24(9) The World Economy 1161
- Duff R and Marshall S, ‘‘Abstract Endangerment’, Two Harm Principles, and Two Routes to Criminalisation’ (2015) 3(2) Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
- Ehteshami A, ‘GCC Foreign policy: From the Iran-Iraq War to the Arab Awakening’ in LSE Middle East Centre Collected Papers 1 (April 2015)
- Fershtman C, Gneezy U, and Hoffman M, ‘Taboos and Identity: Considering the Unthinkable’ (2011) 3 American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 139
- Fletcher A and Kera D, ‘The forty-Fourth Year of Administration of the Trademark Act of 1946’ (1991) 81 TMR 601
- Gerhardt DM, ‘Trademarks as Entrepreneurial Change Agents for Legal Reform’ (2017) 95(5) North Carolina Law Review, 1519
- Gibbons LJ, ‘Semiotics of the Scandalous and the Immoral and the Disparaging: Section 2(A) Trademark Law after Lawrence v. Texas.’ (2005) 9(2) Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
- Gilson Lalonde A & Gilson J, ‘Trademarks laid bare: Marks that may be scandalous or immoral’ (2011) Trademark Reporter 1476
- Goble GW, ‘Where and What a Trade-Mark Protects’ (1927) 22 U. ILL. L. REV. 379, 388
- Habachy S, ‘Protection of Trademarks and Patent Rights in the Middle East History, Geography and Economics’ (1962) 6 Patent, Trademark and Copyright Journal of Research and Education
- Khoury AH, ‘Ancient and Islamic Sources of Intellectual Property Protection in the Middle East: A Focus on Trademarks’ (2003) 43(2) IDEA – The Journal of Law and Technology 151
- Marks T and Betancourt JC, ‘Rethinking public policy and alternative dispute resolution: negotiability, mediability and arbitrability’ (2012) 78(1) Arbitration 19
- McKenna MP, ‘Testing Modern Trademark Law’s Theory of Harm’ (2009) 95 Iowa Law Review 63
- Oswald L, ‘Challenging the Registration of Scandalous and Disparaging Marks under the Lanham Act: Who has Standing to Sue?’ (2004) 41 American Bus. L. J. 251
- Palmer B, 'Saudi Arabia’s Trademark Law' (1986) 1(3) Arab Law Quarterly 323
- Pollack M, ‘Your Image Is My Image: When Advertising Dedicates Trademarks to the Public Domain-with an example from the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984’ (1993) 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 1391
- Ramsey LP, ‘A Free Speech Right To Trademark Protection?’ (2016) 106(1) Trademark Reporter 797
- Scassa T, ‘Antisocial Trademarks’ (2013) 103(5) Trademark Reporter 1172
- Schechter F, ‘The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection’ (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review 813
- Shaoping G and Lin Z, ‘Human Dignity as a Right’ (2009) 4(3) Frontiers of Philosophy in China 370
- Snow N, ‘Free Speech & Disparaging Trademarks’ (2016) 57 Boston College Law Review 1675
- Spence M, ‘The Mark as Expression/The Mark as Property’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems 491
- Stolte KM, 'How Early Did Anglo-American Trademark Law Begin ? An Answer to Schechter’s Conundrum' (1997) 8 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 505
- Swann, Sr. JB, ‘The Trademark Reporter as Catalyst’ (2011) 101(1) Trade Mark Reporter 81
- Wasserman DI, ‘Trading Sex, Marking Bodies: Pornographic Trademarks and the Lanham Act’ (2010) 23 National Black Law Journal
- Allan TRS, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (OUP 2001)
- Allan TRS, The Sovereignty of Law, Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (OUP 2013)
- Ballantyne WM, Essays and Addresses on Arab Laws (Curzon Press 2000)
- Batey M, Brand Meaning (Routledge 2008)
- Bently L, ‘The Making of Modern Trade Marks Law: The Construction of the Legal Concept of Trade Mark (1860-80)’ in Bently L, Davis J, and Ginsburg C (eds), Trade Marks and Brands.. An Interdisciplinary Critique (CUP 2010)
- Bently L, ‘From Communication to Thing: Historical Aspects of the Conceptualisation of Trade Marks as Property‘ in Dinwoodie GB and Janis MD (eds), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2008)
- Bently L, and Davis J, and Ginsburg JC (eds), Trade Marks and Brands. An Interdisciplinary Critique (CUP 2010)
- Bodenhausen GHC, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (as revised at Stockholm in 1967)
- Davison MD, Horak I, and The Hon. Justice Gummow WMC, Shanahan’s Australian Law of Trade Marks and Passing Off (5th edn, Thomson Reuters 2012)
- de Carvalho NP, The TRIPS Regime of Trademarks and Designs (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2011)
- Galligan DJ, Discretionary powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Clarendon Press 1986)
- Gibbons LJ, ‘Trademarking the Immoral and the Scandalous: Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act’ in Peter K. Yu (ed), Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age (Volume 3, Ch 4, Praeger Publishers 2007)
- Hansen PW, Intellectual Property Law and Practice of the United Arab Emirates (OUP 2009)
- Landolt PL, Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2008)
- Lloyd D, Public Policy: A Comparative Study in English and French Law (London: Athlone Press, 1953)
- Mill JS, On Liberty (J. W. Parker and Son 1859)
- Phillips J, Trade Mark Law; A Practical Anatomy (OUP 2003)
- Price D, The Development of Intellectual Property Regimes in the Arabian Gulf States. Infidels at the Gates (Routledge 2012)
- Ramadan T, Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation (OUP 2009)
- Schechter FI, ‘The Genesis of the Modern Law Relating to Trade-Marks’ in Dinwoodie GB and Janis MD (eds), Trade mark and Unfair Competition Law: Themes and Theories (Critical Concepts in Intellectual Property Series) (Volume I, Edward Elgar Publishing 2014, and as reviewed by Hyland G, Columbia Legal Studies (2011))
- Turner JH, Revolt from the Middle. Emotional Stratification and Change in Post-Industrial Societies (Routledge 2017)
- CIA, World Factbook, www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sa.html
- Edward Smith (2009), Absolute Grounds paper submitted by United Kingdom for SCT Assistant Principal Hearing, available at: www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sct/en/comments/pdf/sct21/ref_uk.pdf
- EUIPO, ‘Guidelines for examination Trade mark, Part B Examination – Absolute Grounds of Refusal’ (24 May 2016).
- Gulf Labour Markets and Migration, available at: http://gulfmigration.eu/glmm-database/demographic-and-economic-module/?search=1&cmct=Saudi+Arabia
- Johnson, ‘Swearing: The Last Taboos’ (Blog: Prospero, 21 January 2015), available at: https://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2015/01/johnson-swearing.
- WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: France (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/France)
- WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: Germany (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/Germany).
- WTR Yearbook 2017 - Trade mark procedures and strategies: Italy (World Trade mark Review, available at: www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/Italy)