Jump to content
Enforcement of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 TFEU / Need for a Precedent from the European Commission
Enforcement of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 TFEU / Need for a Precedent from the European Commission
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
2–6
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
2–6
Details
7–10
Abstract
7–10
Details
11–14
Introduction
11–14
Details
15–26
1. Objectives and Benefits of Standardization
15–26
15–19
1.1 ETSI GSM Standards
15–19
Details
19–21
1.2 The Role of SSOs and Rational Behind the FRAND Commitments
19–21
Details
21–26
1.3 Criticized Pitfalls of the Current FRAND Regime
21–26
21–23
1.3.1 The Patent Hold-Up Problem
21–23
Details
23–26
1.3.2 Royalty Stacking
23–26
Details
27–32
2. Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights
27–32
Details
2.1 The Objectives of Article 102 TFEU
Details
33–46
3. The Applicability of Article 102 TFEU to Enforce FRAND Commitments
33–46
33–35
3.1 Market Definition in Technology Markets
33–35
Details
35–37
3.2 Dominance in Technology Markets
35–37
Details
37–44
3.3 Abusive Conducts in a Standard-setting Context
37–44
37–41
3.3.1 Excessive Pricing Under Article 102 (a) TFEU
37–41
Details
41–44
3.3.2 Price Discrimination under Article 102 (c) TFEU
41–44
Details
44–45
3.4 Other Exclusionary Practices
44–45
Details
3.4.1 The Misuse of Intellectual Property Rights
Details
45–46
3.5 Conclusion on the Applicability of Article 102 TFEU on FRAND Commitments
45–46
Details
47–64
4. Case Studies Related to the Enforcement of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 TFEU
47–64
47–50
4.1 The Qualcomm Case
47–50
Details
4.1.1 What is the Object of the European Commission’s Decision to Initiate Proceedings in the Qualcomm case?
Details
50–60
4.2 Possible Doctrinal Solutions based on the Meaning of FRAND Terms
50–60
50–55
4.2.1 The Meaning of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 (a) and (c) TFEU - Possible Doctrinal Solutions Based on Established EC Case Law
50–55
Details
55–60
4.2.2 Deceptive Conduct in the Standard-Setting Process - Is the AstraZeneca “Doctrine” Applicable to FRAND Commitments?
55–60
Details
60–64
4.3 Need for a Precedent from the European Commission
60–64
Details
65–72
5. FRAND Defence in Patent Litigation under German Law
65–72
65–69
5.1 FRAND Defence and Limited Right to Injunctions
65–69
Details
69–72
5.2 The IPCom v Nokia Case
69–72
Details
73–74
Conclusion
73–74
Details
75–82
References
75–82
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Enforcement of FRAND Commitments under Article 102 TFEU , page 60 - 64
Need for a Precedent from the European Commission
Autoren
Tuire Anniina Väisänen
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783845229843-60
ISBN print: 978-3-8329-5837-4
ISBN online: 978-3-8452-2984-3
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783845229843-60
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
