The Challenge of Stability

Schlagworte

Bundesverfassungsgericht constitutional adjudication countermajoritarian difficulty constitutional law countermojoritarian difficulty funktionale Differenzierung functional differentiation Niklas Luhmann Oberstes Gericht der Vereinigten Staaten German Federal Constitutional Court judicial politicization Politische Soziologie politisches System legal autonomy political sociology rechtliche Autonomie political system richterliche Politisierung Soziologie sociology Subsystem sub-systems systems theory Systemtheorie United States Supreme Court US Supreme Court Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit Verfassungsrecht

• Ackerman, Bruce A, ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, 93 Yale LJ 1013 (1984)
• Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights and Proportionality’, 22 Revus: J Const Theory & Phil Law 51 (2014)
• Alexy, Robert, ‘Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation’, 3 Ricerche giuridiche 197 (2014)
• Anderson, Elizabeth, ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, 109 Ethics 287 (1999)
• Anderson, Elizabeth, The Imperative of Integration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010)
• Anderson, Joel, ‘Autonomy and Vulnerability Entwined’, in Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds (eds), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (OUP, New York, 2013) 134
• Badas, Alex, ‘The Applied Legitimacy Index: A New Approach to Measuring Judicial Legitimacy’, 100 Soc Sci Q 1848 (2019)
• Baer, Susanne, ‘Who cares? A defence of judicial review’, 8 J Brit Acad 75 (2020)
• Balkin, Jack M, ‘Respect-Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution’, 39 Tulsa L Rev 495 (2004)
• Balkin, Jack M, and Levinson, Sanford, ‘Understanding the Constitutional Revolution’, 87 Va L Rev 1045 (2001)
• Barber, James D, The Lawmakers: Recruitment and Adaptation to Legislative Life (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1965)
• Barnes, Robert, ‘The political wars damage public perception of Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts says’, The Washington Post, 4 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/3H8C-98RP
• Barnett, Randy E, ‘Constitutional Legitimacy’, 103 Colum L Rev 111 (2003)
• Barroso, Luís R, ‘Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The Roles of Constitutional Courts in Democracies’, 67 Am J Comp L 109 (2019)
• Barry, Brian, ‘John Rawls and the Search for Stability’, 105 Ethics 874 (1995)
• Barskanmaz, Cengiz, ‘Das Kopftuch als das Andere. Eine notwendige postkoloniale Kritik des deutschen Rechtsdiskurses’, in Sabine Berghahn and Petra Rostock (eds), Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (transcript, Bielefeld, 2009)
• Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public’, 57 Am J Pol Sci 184 (2013)
• Bartels, Brandon L, and Johnston, Christopher D, ‘Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences Toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process’, 76 Pub Opin Q 105 (2012)
• Bartels, Brandon L, and Kramon, Eric, ‘All the President’s Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval’, 66 Am J Pol Sci 171 (2022)
• Bartels, Brandon L, Johnston, Christopher D, and Mark, Alyx, ‘Lawyers’ Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a “Political” Institution?’, 49 Law & Soc’y Rev 761 (2015)
• Bartlett, Katharine T, ‘Feminist Legal Methods’, 103 Harv L Rev 829 (1990)
• Bassok, Or, ‘The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy’, 21 German LJ 131 (2020)
• Bassok, Or, ‘The Supreme Court’s New Source of Legitimacy’, 16 U Pa J Const L 153 (2013)
• Bassok, Or, and Dotan, Yoav, ‘Solving the countermajoritarian difficulty?’, 11 Int’l J Const L 13 (2013)
• Baynes, Kenneth, ‘Democracy and the Rechtsstaat: Habermas’s Faktizität und Geltung’, in Stephen K White (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 201
• Becker, Mary, ‘Conservative Free Speech and the Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’, 64 U Colo L Rev 975 (1993)
• Becker, Mary, Grant Bowman, Cynthia, and Torrey, Morrison, Feminist Jurisprudence: Taking Women Seriously (2nd edn, West Group, St Paul, 2001)
• Bell, Derrick, ‘Bell, J., dissenting’, in Jack M Balkin (ed), What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Landmark Civil Rights Decision (New York University Press, New York, 2001) 185
• Berbuir, Nicole, Lewandowsky, Marcel, and Siri, Jasmin, ‘The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?’, 24 German Pol 154 (2015)
• Berger, Peter L, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, Garden City, 1966)
• Bethge, Herbert, ‘§ 31’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu, Franz Klein and Herbert Bethge, Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Bickel, Alexander M, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1962)
• Blau, Peter M, ‘Critical Remarks on Weber’s Theory of Authority’, 57 Am Pol Sci Rev 305 (1963)
• Bobbitt, Philip, Constitutional Interpretation (Blackwell, Oxford, 1991)
• Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit: Strukturfragen, Organisation, Legitimation’, 52 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 9 (1999)
• Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, Verfassungsfragen der Richterwahl: Dargestellt anhand der Gesetzentwürfe zur Einführung der Richterwahl in Nordrhein-Westfalen (2nd edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1998)
• Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, ‘Jürgen Habermas’, in Edward Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edn), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/habermas/ (last accessed 4 March 2022)
• Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N, ‘Counteracting the Politicization of Science’, 65 J Commun 745 (2016)
• Bora, Alfons, ‘Recht und Politik. Krisen der Politik und die Leistungsfähigkeit des Rechts’, in Armin Nassehi and Markus Schroer (eds), Der Begriff des Politischen (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2003) 189
• Borch, Christian, Niklas Luhmann (Routledge, London, 2011)
• Bornemann, Basil, ‘Politisierung des Rechts und Verrechtlichung der Politik durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht? Systemtheoretische Betrachtungen zum Wandel des Verhältnisses von Recht und Politik und zur Rolle der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 28 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 75 (2007)
• Bowie, Nikolas, ‘The Contemporary Debate over Supreme Court Reform: Origins and Perspectives’, Written Statement to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, pp 1, available at https://perma.cc/7HK9-CDQC
• Bravin, Jess, and Kendall, Brent, ‘For Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland, Law Prevails Over Ideology’, The Wall Street Journal, 16 March 2016, available at https://perma.cc/Q7YB-NU2N
• Brinkmann, Matthias, ‘Coordination Cannot Establish Political Authority’, 31 Ratio Juris 49 (2018)
• Brockell, Gillian, ‘The last Supreme Court nominee confirmed without bipartisan support never heard a single case’, The Washington Post, 27 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/3NXB-ZFXD
• Brown-Nagin, Tomiko, ‘Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action’, 105 Colum L Rev 1436 (2005)
• Bubrowski, Helene, ‘Grüne unterstützen Harbarths Wahl’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/8WMZ-MWU2
• Bubrowski, Helene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Spielball der Politik? Neue Sorgen um Akzeptanz und Statik des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 21 February 2018, p 8
• Buchanan, Allen, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’, 112 Ethics 689 (2002)
• Burke, Kenneth, A Grammar of Motives (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969) 357
• Cain Miller, Claire, and Sanger-Katz, Margot, ‘On Abortion Law, the U.S. Is Unusual. Without Roe, It Would Be, Too’, The New York Times, 22 January 2022, available at https://perma.cc/U45R-BLP9
• Calabresi, Steven G, and Lindgren, James, ‘Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered’, 29 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 769 (2006)
• Caldeira, Gregory A, and Gibson, James L, ‘The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 36 Am J Pol Sci 635 (1992)
• Cameron, Charles M, Cover, Albert D, and Segal, Jeffrey A, ‘Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model’, 84 Am Pol Sci Rev 525 (1990)
• Carrington, Nathan T, and French, Colin, ‘One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch: Kavanaugh and Change in Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’, 102 Soc Sci Q 1484 (2021)
• Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N, ‘Framing Theory’, 10 Annu Rev Pol Sci 103 (2007)
• Chong, Moohyung, Todd, Jason D, and Vanberg, Georg, ‘Politics, Polarization, and the U.S. Supreme Court’, in Anna-Bettina Kaiser, Niels Petersen and Johannes Saurer (eds), The U.S. Supreme Court and Contemporary Constitutional Law: The Obama Era and Its Legacy (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2018) 41
• Choper, Jesse H, ‘The Supreme Court and the Political Branches: Democratic Theory and Practice’, 122 U Pa L Rev 810 (1974)
• Choper, Jesse H, Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980)
• Christenson, Dino P, and Glick, David M, ‘Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 403 (2015)
• Christiano, Thomas, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits (OUP, Oxford, 2008)
• Collins, Paul M Jr, and Ringhand, Lori A, Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (CUP, Cambridge, 2013)
• Coutu, Walter, ‘Role-Playing vs. Role-Taking: An Appeal for Clarification’, 16 Am Soc Rev 180 (1951)
• Dahl, Robert A, ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’, 6 J Pub L 279 (1957)
• Dahrendorf, Ralf, Gesellschaft und Freiheit (Piper & Co, Munich, 1961)
• Davis, Richard, ‘Symbiosis: The US Supreme Court and the Journalists Who Cover It’, in Richard Davis (ed), Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective (CUP, Cambridge, 2018) 281
• de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Arthur Goldhammer tr, Library of America, New York, 2004 [1835])
• Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence, ‘Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court’, 2016 Sup Ct Rev 301 (2016)
• Dhawan, Nikita, and others, ‘Normative Legitimacy and Normative Dilemmas: Postcolonial Interventions’, in Nikita Dhawan and others (eds), Negotiating Normativity: Postcolonial Appropriations, Contestations, and Transformations (Springer, Cham, 2016) 1
• di Fabio, Udo, ‘Art. 4 GG’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 94th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Dinh, Viet D, ‘Threats to Judicial Independence, Real and Imagined’, 95 Geo LJ 929 (2007)
• Dixon, Rosalind, ‘Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited’, 5 Int’l J Const L 391 (2007)
• Doerfler, Ryan D, and Moyn, Samuel, ‘Democratizing the Supreme Court’, 109 Cal L Rev 1703 (2021)
• Dreier, Horst, ‘Art. 146’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018)
• Dreier, Horst, ‘Vorbemerkungen vor Artikel 1’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 1 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2013)
• Dressel, Björn, ‘Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand’, 23 Pac Rev 671 (2010)
• Durkheim, Émile, De la division du travail social (5th edn, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris, 1926)
• Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Equality, Democracy, and Constitution: We the People in Court’, 28 Alta L Rev 324 (1990)
• Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Justice Sotomayor: The Unjust Hearings’, The New York Review of Books, 24 September 2009, available at https://perma.cc/BA4F-V5XH
• Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1985)
• Dworkin, Ronald, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1996)
• Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1986)
• Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2002)
• Easton, David, ‘A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, 5 Br J Pol Sci 435 (1975)
• Easton, David, ‘An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems’, 9 World Pol 383 (1957)
• Easton, David, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1965)
• Eckhoff, Torstein, ‘Impartiality, Separation of Powers, and Judicial Independence’, 9 Scandinavian Stud in Law 11 (1965)
• Effron, Robin J, ‘Will the Judicial Get Political?’, Brooklyn Law Notes, Fall 2019, available at https://perma.cc/A6N7-A4Y5
• Eisgruber, Christopher, Constitutional Self-Government (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2001)
• Engst, Benjamin, and others, ‘Zum Einfluss der Parteinähe auf das Abstimmungsverhalten der Bundesverfassungsrichter – eine quantitative Untersuchung’, 72 JuristenZeitung 816 (2017)
• Engst, Benjamin, Gschwend, Thomas, and Sternberg, Sebastian, ‘Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: Ein Spiegelbild gesellschaftlicher Präferenzen?’, 61 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39 (2020)
• Epps, Daniel, and Sitaraman, Ganesh, ‘How to Save the Supreme Court’, 129 Yale LJ 148 (2019)
• Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack, ‘Efficacious judging on apex courts’, in Erin F Delany and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 272
• Epstein, Lee, and others (eds), The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments (6th edn, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2015)
• Epstein, Lee, and others, ‘The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees’, 68 J Pol 296 (2006)
• Epstein, Lee, and Posner, Eric, ‘If the Supreme Court Is Nakedly Political, Can It Be Just?’, The New York Times, 9 July 2018, available at https://perma.cc/4K2Z-5YG4
• Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A, Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments (OUP, New York, 2005)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘As-Applied and Facial Challenges and Third-Party Standing’, 113 Harv L Rev 1321 (2000)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Constitutional Constraints’, 97 Cal L Rev 975 (2009)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘How to Choose a Constitutional Theory’, 87 Cal L Rev 535 (1999)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Legitimacy and the Constitution’, 118 Harv L Rev 1787 (2005)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘The Core of an Uneasy Case For Judicial Review’, 121 Harv L Rev 1693 (2008)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 2018)
• Fallon, Richard H Jr, The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny (CUP, Cambridge, 2019)
• Fandos, Nicholas, ‘Senate Confirms Barrett, Delivering for Trump and Reshaping the Court’, The New York Times, 26 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/P3RT-8Y5E
• Farahat, Anuscheh, ‘The German Federal Constitutional Court’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter M Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 279
• Farahat, Anuscheh, Transnationale Solidaritätskonflikte: Eine vergleichende Analyse verfassungsgerichtlicher Konfliktbearbeitung in der Eurokrise (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2021)
• Ferejohn, John, ‘Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law’, 65 Law & Contemp Probs 41 (2002).
• Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe’, 82 Tex L Rev 1671 (2004)
• Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 242
• Fine, Adam D, and van Rooij, Benjamin, ‘Legal socialization: Understanding the obligation to obey the law’, 7 J Soc Issues 367 (2021)
• Fiorina, Morris P, and Levendusky, Matthew S, ‘Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People’, in Pietro S Nivola and David W Brady (eds), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics, vol 1 (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 2006) 49
• Forst, Rainer, ‘Justifying Justification: Reply to My Critics’, in Rainer Forst (ed), Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue (Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014) 169
• Forst, Rainer, ‘The Justification of Basic Rights: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach’, 45 Netherlands J Legal Phil 7 (2016)
• Forst, Rainer, Normativity and Power: Analyzing Social Orders of Justification (Ciaran Cronin tr, OUP, Oxford, 2017)
• Forst, Rainer, The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice (Jeffrey Flynn tr, Columbia University Press, New York, 2012)
• Frank, Jerome, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949)
• Franklin, Mark, Marsh, Michael, and McLaren, Lauren, ‘Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht’, 32 J Common Mkt Stud 455 (1994)
• Fraser, Nancy, ‘Politics, culture, and the public sphere: toward a postmodern conception’, in Linda Nicholson and Steven Seidman, Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics (CUP, Cambridge, 1995) 287
• Freeman, Samuel, ‘Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review’, 9 Law & Phil 327 (1991)
• Freud, Sigmund, ‘Die Verneinung’, in Gesammelte Werke, vol 14 (Anna Freud and others eds, Fischer, Frankfurt am Main, 1955)
• Fried, Charles, ‘Balls and Strikes’, 61 Emory LJ 641, 641 (2012)
• Friedman, Lawrence M, Law and Society: An Introduction (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1977)
• Fromme, Friedrich K, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl’, 53 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2977 (2000)
• Galtung, Johan, ‘Expectations and Interaction Processes’, 2 Inquiry 213 (1959)
• Galtung, Johan, ‘Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A theoretical paradigm’, 2 J Peace Res 348 (1965)
• Gay Stolberg, Sheryl, ‘Susan Collins, A Fixture in Maine, Has Twin Troubles: Trump and Kavanaugh’, The New York Times, 6 July 2019, available at https://perma.cc/N28L-UPLM
• Gehlen, Arnold, Der Mensch: Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt (first published 1940, re-worked and re-published 1950, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2016)
• Gelinsky, Katja, ‘Wise Old Men and Wise Old Women. Vom Rätselraten über den Einfluss der Frauen am Bundesverfassungsgericht und am Supreme Court’, in Michael Stolleis (ed), Herzkammern der Republik: Die Deutschen und das Bundesverfassungsgericht (CH Beck, Munich, 2011) 82
• Gibson, James L, ‘A Note of Caution About the Meaning of “The Supreme Court Can Usually Be Trusted ...”’, 21 Law & Cts: Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 10 (2011)
• Gibson, James L, ‘Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, in Brian H Bornstein and Alan J Tomkins, Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust (Springer, Cham, 2015) 81
• Gibson, James L, ‘Losing Legitimacy: The Challenges of the Dobbs Ruling to Conventional Legitimacy Theory’, last revised 5 January 2023, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206986
• Gibson, James L, ‘The Legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity’, 4 J Empirical Legal Stud 507 (2007)
• Gibson, James L, ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 469 (1989)
• Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination’, 53 Am J Pol Sci 139 (2009)
• Gibson, James L, and Caldeira, Gregory A, ‘Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?’, 45 Law & Soc’y Rev 195 (2011)
• Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 162 (2015)
• Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?’, 14 J Empirical Legal Stud 592 (2017)
• Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J, ‘The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto’, 10 Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 201 (2014)
• Gibson, James L, Caldeira, Gregory A, and Spence, Lester K, ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’, 58 Pol Res Q 187 (2005)
• Gibson, James L, Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority’, 48 Law & Soc’y Rev 837 (2014)
• Gibson, James L, Pereira, Miguel M, and Ziegler, Jeffrey, ‘Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the “Rule, Learn, Update” Model of Political Communication’, 45 Am Pol Res 980 (2017)
• Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (CUP, Cambridge, 2003)
• Goffman, Erving, ‘On Face-Work’, reprinted in Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (Doubleday, New York City, 1967) 5
• Goldman, Sheldon, and Jahnige, Thomas P, The Federal Courts as a Political System (Harper & Row, New York, 1971)
• Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Judges for Future: The Climate Action Judgment as a Postcolonial Turn in Constitutional Law?’, Verfassungsblog, 30 April 2021, available at https://perma.cc/Z93Y-GJA7
• Graber, Mark A, ‘The Coming Constitutional Yo-Yo: Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making’, 56 Howard LJ 661 (2013)
• Greene, Jamal, ‘Foreword: Rights as Trumps?’, 132 Harv L Rev 28 (2018)
• Griffin, Stephen M, ‘The Age of Marbury: Judicial Review in a Democracy of Rights’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 104
• Grimm, Dieter, ‘Neue Radikalkritik an der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 321 (2020)
• Grimm, Dieter, ‘Politikdistanz als Voraussetzung von Politikkontrolle’, 27 Zeitschrift für Europäische Grundrechte 1 (2000)
• Grimm, Dieter, ‘What Exactly Is Political About Constitutional Adjudication?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 307
• Gringlas, Sam, ‘Asked About Court Packing, Biden Says He Will Convene Commission To Study Reforms’, npr.org, 22 October 2020, available at https://perma.cc/BP8G-MY56
• Grünberger, Michael, ‘Warum der Stadionverbots-Beschluss weit mehr ist als nur Common Sense’, Verfassungsblog, 1 May 2018, available at https://perma.cc/P85K-UGNZ
• Grunert, Marlene, and Müller, Reinhard, ‘Was kann Karlsruhe? 70 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht – Dieter Grimm und Andreas Voßkuhle über Fehler, Leistungen, Corona und Europa’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 September 2021, p 8
• Grünewald, Benedikt, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Christian Walter and Benedikt Grünewald (eds), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz (13th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2022)
• Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (Belknap, Cambridge MA, 1996)
• Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Legitimationsprobleme im modernen Staat’, in Peter Graf Kielmansegg (ed), Legitimationsprobleme politischer Systeme (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1976) 39
• Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism’, 92 J Phil 109 (1995)
• Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Technology and Science as “Ideology”’, in Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Jeremy J Shapiro tr, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970) 81
• Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Niklas Luhmann’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 142
• Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 101
• Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg tr, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1996)
• Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Thomas McCarthy tr, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1997)
• Hagen, Wolfgang, ‘Es gibt keine Biographie’, Interview with Niklas Luhmann, Radio Bremen, 2 October 1997, available at https://perma.cc/U6MA-GUM9
• Hähnig, Anne, Machowecz, Martin, and Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Eine Richterin als der ultimative Kompromiss’, Die Zeit, 1 July 2020, available at https://perma.cc/4Q7H-7LCU
• Hamilton, Alexander, ‘Federalist No. 78’, in Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (Michael A Genovese ed, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2009 [1787/1788]) 235
• Hamilton, Eric, ‘Politicizing the Supreme Court’, 65 Stan L Rev Online 35 (2012)
• Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 6 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Haratsch, Andreas, ‘§ 7 BVerfGG’, in Bruno Schmidt-Bleibtreu and others (eds), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 61st delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Harel, Alon, and Shinar, Adam, ‘The real case for judicial review’, in Erin F Delaney and Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Judicial Review (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2018) 13
• Hart Ely, John, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1981)
• Hart, Henry M, and Sacks, Arthur M, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (tentative edn, Cambridge MA, 1958)
• Hart, HLA, ‘American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream’, 11 Ga L Rev 969 (1977)
• Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972)
• Hay, Colin, Why We Hate Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007) 81
• Heck, Justus, Itschert, Adrian, and Tratschin, Luca, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren: Zum Entstehungskontext und zur Aktualität eines Nicht-Klassikers’, 22 Soziale Systeme 1 (2017)
• Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘Die Politisierung der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Eine ideengeschichtliche und systematische Begriffsrekonstruktion’, in Jörn Knobloch and Thorsten Schlee (eds), Unschärferelationen: Konstruktionen der Differenz von Politik und Recht (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018) 103
• Hein, Michael, and Ewert, Stefan, ‘How Do Types of Procedure Affect the Degree of Politicization of European Constitutional Courts? A Comparative Study of Germany, Bulgaria, and Portugal’, 9 Eur J Legal Stud 62 (2016)
• Herdegen, Matthias, ‘Verfassungsinterpretation als methodische Disziplin’, 59 JuristenZeitung 873 (2004)
• Higgins, Tracy E, ‘Democracy and Feminism’, 110 Harv L Rev 1657 (1997)
• Hillgruber, Christian, ‘Art. 144’, in Volker Epping and Christian Hillgruber (eds), Beck’scher Online Kommentar Grundgesetz (49th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Judicialization of Politics’, in Gregory A Caldeira, R Daniel Kelemen and Keith E Whittington (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (OUP, Oxford, 2008) 119
• Hirschmann, Nancy, ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom’, 24 Pol Theory 46 (1996)
• Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Penguin, London, 1981 [1651])
• Hobolt, Sara B, ‘When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums’, 15 J Elections, Pub Opinion & Parties 85 (2005)
• Holmes, Stephen, ‘Precommitment and the paradox of democracy’, in Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad (eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy (CUP, Cambridge, 1988) 195
• Hönnige, Christoph, Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition: Die vergleichende Analyse eines Spannungsdreiecks (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2007)
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary, ‘Politicization’, in Erik Jones, Anand Menon and Stephen Weatherill, The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 840
• Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Courts and Politics in the European Legal Space’ (forthcoming)
• Husserl, Edmund, Pariser Vorträge und Cartesianische Meditationen (Nijhoff, The Hague, 1950)
• Hutchinson, Darren L, ‘The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, and Supreme Court Politics’, 23 Law & Ineq 1 (2005)
• Ifill, Sherrilyn A, ‘Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence’, 57 Wash & Lee L Rev 405 (2000)
• Illing, Sean, ‘The case for stripping the Supreme Court of its power’, Vox, 12 October 2018, available at https://www.vox.com/2018/10/12/17950896/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-mark-tushnet (last accessed 22 November 2021)
• Isensee, Josef, ‘Das Grundrecht als Abwehrrecht und als staatliche Schutzpflicht’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof, Handbuch des Staatsrechts, vol 9 (3rd edn, CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2011) 413
• Ivison, Duncan, ‘Pluralising political legitimacy’, 20 Postcolonial Studies 118 (2017)
• Jackson, Vicki C, ‘A Democracy of Rights: The Dark Side? – A Comment on Stephen M. Griffin’, in Mark Tushnet (ed), Arguing Marbury v. Madison (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2005) 147
• Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’, 28 Penn State Int’l L Rev 319 (2010)
• Jackson, Vicki C, ‘Packages of Judicial Independence: The Selection and Tenure of Article III Judges’, 95 Geo L J 965 (2007)
• Janisch, Wolfgang, ‘Institution in Gefahr’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 October 2018, available at https://perma.cc/N479-RXHS
• Johnston, Christopher D, and Bartels, Brandon L, ‘Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts’, 74 Pub Opinion Q 260 (2010)
• Jost, Sebastian, ‘EZB steht ein zweites Mal vor dem Verfassungsgericht’, Die Welt, 15 February 2016, available at https://perma.cc/9GB8-YVWQ
• Kagan, Elena, ‘Confirmation Messes, Old and New’, 62 U Chi L Rev 919 (1994)
• Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor tr and ed, CUP, Cambridge, 1996 [1797])
• Kastellec, Jonathan P, Lax, Jeffrey R, and Phillips, Justin H, ‘Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees’, 72 J Pol 767 (2010)
• Katyal, Neal K, ‘Legislative Constitutional Interpretation’, 50 Duke LJ 1335 (2001)
• Kau, Marcel, United States Supreme Court und Bundesverfassungsgericht: Die Bedeutung des United States Supreme Court für die Errichtung und Fortentwicklung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Springer, Berlin, 2007)
• Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘Participation and Judicial Review’, 22 Law & Phil 451 (2003)
• Kelsen, Hans, ‘Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Wer soll Hüter der Verfassung sein? Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der pluralistischen, parlamentarischen Demokratie (Robert C van Ooyen ed, 2nd edn [reprint], Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2019 [1929]) 1 [30]
• Kennedy, Deseriee, ‘Judicial Review and Diversity’, 71 Tenn L Rev 287 (2004)
• Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: fin de siècle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1997)
• Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, ‘Legitimität als analytische Kategorie’, 12 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 367 (1971)
• Kieserling, André, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren (1969)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 145
• King, Michael, and Thornhill, Chris, Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2003)
• Kischel, Uwe, ‘Amt, Unbefangenheit und Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter’, in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vol 3 (3rd edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2005) 1233
• Kischel, Uwe, ‘Party, pope, and politics? The election of German Constitutional Court justices in comparative perspective’, 11 Int’l J Con L 962 (2013)
• Klarman, Michael J, ‘Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman’s Theory of Constitutional Moments’, 44 Stan L Rev 759 (1992)
• Klarman, Michael J, ‘How Brown Changed Race Relations: The Backlash Thesis’, 81 J Am Hist 81 (1994)
• Klarman, Michael J, ‘The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory’, 77 Va L Rev 747 (1991)
• Klarman, Michael J, ‘What’s So Great About Constitutionalism?’, 93 Nw U L Rev 145 (1998)
• Knudsen, Sven-Eric, Luhmann und Husserl: Systemtheorie im Verhältnis zur Phänomenologie (Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 2006)
• Koenen, Elmar, ‘Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (1971)’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012) 150
• Korioth, Stefan, ‘Stellung und Einrichtung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, in Klaus Schlaich and Stefan Korioth, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht: Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen (12th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Kramer, Larry D, ‘Foreword: We the Court’, 115 Harv L Rev 5 (2001)
• Kranenpohl, Uwe, Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses: Der Willensbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozess des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2010)
• Krause, Werner, and Wagner, Aiko, ‘Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy’, 27 Party Pol 161 (2021)
• Krewson, Christopher N, ‘Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court’ 1 (forthcoming, Pol Res Q, 2022)
• Krewson, Christopher N, and Schroedel, Jean R, ‘Modern Judicial Confirmation Hearings and Institutional Support for the Supreme Court’ 1, 2–4 (forthcoming, Soc Sci Q), available at https://perma.cc/SM9P-F7SR
• Lamprecht, Rolf, ‘“Bis zur Verachtung”’, 48 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2531 (1995)
• Lange, Stefan, Niklas Luhmanns Theorie der Politik: Eine Abklärung der Staatsgesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003)
• Layman, Geoffrey C, Carsey, Thomas M, and Menasce Horowitz, Juliana, ‘Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences’, 9 Ann Rev Pol Sci 83 (2006)
• Legrand, Pierre, ‘How to compare now’, 16 Legal Stud 232 (1996)
• Leonhardt, David, ‘How to End the Politicization of the Courts’, The New York Times, 4 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/AG4G-DEUA
• Letzgus, Klaus, ‘Wiederaufnahme zuungunsten des Angeklagten bei neuen Tatsachen und Beweisen’, 40 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 717 (2020)
• Levinson, Daryl J, and Pildes, Richard H, ‘Separation of Parties, Not Powers’, 119 Harv L Rev 2311 (2006)
• Liptak, Adam, ‘A Leaky Supreme Court Starts to Resemble the Other Branches’, The New York Times, 11 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/D39H-5C5S
• Liptak, Adam, ‘College Diversity Nears Its Last Stand’, The New York Times, 15 October 2011, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/sunday-review/college-diversity-nears-its-last-stand.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (last accessed 14 February 2022)
• Lithwick, Dahlia, ‘Why I Haven’t Gone Back to SCOTUS Since Kavanaugh’, Slate, 30 October 2019, available at https://perma.cc/JAL8-AEKH
• Loughlin, Martin, ‘The Constitutional Imagination’, 78 Mod L Rev 1 (2015)
• Ludden, Jennifer, ‘Should We Be Having Kids in The Age of Climate Change?’, npr.org, 18 August 2016, available at https://perma.cc/D9D8-Y7N2
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘“Distinctions Directrices”: Über Codierung von Semantiken und Systemen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1987) 13
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Arbeitsteilung und Moral: Durkheims Theorie’, Preface to Émile Durkheim, Über soziale Arbeitsteilung (Ludwig Schmidts tr, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1992 [1930]) 19
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Ausdifferenzierung des Rechtssystems’, 7 Rechtstheorie 121 (1976)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Autopoiesis, Handlung und kommunikative Verständigung’, 11 Zeitschrift für Soziologie 366 (1982)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Die Tücke des Subjekts und die Frage nach den Menschen’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (4th edn, Springer VS, Wiesbaden 2018) 151
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Differentiation of Society’, 2 Can J Soc 29 (1977)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 31
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Funktionen der Rechtsprechung im politischen System’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 49
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Gesellschaft’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1990) 137
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft: Anwendungen der Systemtheorie’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (4th edn, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 1991) 8
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Komplexität und Demokratie’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 35
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Law as a Social System’, 83 Nw U L Rev 136 (1989)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Lob der Routine’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 113
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Moderne Systemtheorien als Form gesamtgesellschaftlicher Analyse’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 7
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Normen in soziologischer Perspektive’, 20 Soziale Welt 28 (1969)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, 13 Cardozo L Rev 1419 (1992)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Organization, membership and the formalization of behavioural expectations [1964]’, 37 Syst Res Behav Sci 425 (2020)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Positivität des Rechts als Voraussetzung einer modernen Gesellschaft’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Hartmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 175
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks on Jürgen Habermas’s Legal Theory’, 17 Cardozo L Rev 883 (1995)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Reform und Information: Theoretische Überlegungen zur Reform der Verwaltung’, in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung (4th edn, Springer, Wiesbaden, 1994) 181
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Selbstlegitimation des Staates’, 15 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 65 (1981)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 25
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 113
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologie des politischen Systems’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 154
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Soziologische Aufklärung’, in Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (6th edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1991) 66
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Systemtheoretische Argumentationen: Eine Entgegnung auf Habermas’, in Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1971) 291
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘The Autopoiesis of Social Systems [1986]’, 6 J Sociocybernetics 84 (2008)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Theorie der politischen Opposition’, 36 Zeitschrift für Politik 13 (1989)
• Luhmann, Niklas, ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176, 204–5.
• Luhmann, Niklas, A Sociological Theory of Law (Elizabeth King-Utz and Martin Albrow tr, 2014) (eBook)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Archimedes und wir: Interviews (Dirk Baecker and Georg Stanitzek eds, Merve Verlag, Berlin, 1987)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1995)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Die Grenzen der Verwaltung (Johannes Schmidt and Christoph Gesigora eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021).
• Luhmann, Niklas, Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1964)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie (5th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2009)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren (10th edn, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 2017)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Organization and Decision (Dirk Baecker ed, Rhodes Barrett tr, CUP, Cambridge, 2018)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Politische Soziologie (André Kieserling ed, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2010)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (John Bednarz, Jr, tr with Dirk Baecker, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Systemtheorie der Gesellschaft (Johannes Schmidt and André Kieserling eds, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2017)
• Luhmann, Niklas, Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (5th edn, UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz, 2014)
• Machura, Stefan, ‘Legitimation durch Verfahren – was bleibt?’, 22 Soziale Systeme 331 (2017)
• MacKinnon, Catharine A, ‘“Freedom from Unreal Loyalties: On Fidelity in Constitutional Interpretation’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1773 (1997)
• MacKinnon, Catharine A, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1987)
• MacKinnon, Catharine A, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1989)
• Malcolm, Joyce L, ‘Whatever the Judges Say It Is? The Founders and Judicial Review’, 26 J Law & Pol 1 (2010)
• Maravall, José M, ‘The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon’, in José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (CUP, Cambridge, 2003) 261
• Marcus, Ruth, ‘Justice Sotomayor drops the S-bomb’, The Washington Post, 3 December 2021, available at https://perma.cc/YEA2-2K5W
• Marshall, William P, ‘Constitutional Law as Political Spoils’, 26 Cardozo L Rev 525 (2005)
• Masing, Johannes, ‘§ 15: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Matthias Herdegen and others (eds), Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts: Darstellung in transnationaler Perspektive (CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Mason, Lilliana, ‘“I Respectfully Disagree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization’, 59 Am J Pol Sci 128 (2015)
• Mason, Lilliana, ‘The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate’, 57 Am Behav Scientist 140 (2013)
• Maturana, Humberto, ‘The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization’, 7 Int’l J Man-Machine Stud 313 (1975)
• McConnell, Michael W, Written Testimony Before the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, 30 June 2021, p 7, available at https://perma.cc/KJT6-HAHM
• McGinnis, John O, and Rappaport, Michael B, ‘In Praise of Supreme Court Filibusters’, 33 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 39 (2010)
• Mead, George H, Mind, Self & Society (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015 [1934])
• Merton, Robert K, Social Theory and Social Structure (enlarged edn, Free Press, New York, 1968)
• Meyer, Hans, ‘Grundgesetzliche Demokratie und Wahlrecht für Nichtdeutsche’, 71 JuristenZeitung 121 (2016)
• Michelman, Frank I, ‘Brennan and Democracy’, 86 Cal L Rev 399 (1998)
• Michelman, Frank I, ‘Ida’s Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System’, 72 Fordham L Rev 345 (2003)
• Michelman, Frank I, ‘Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review’, 72 Fordham L Rev 1407 (2003)
• Michelman, Frank I, ‘The bind of tolerance and a call to feminist thought: A reply to Gila Stopler’, 19 Int’l J Con L 408 (2021)
• Michelman, Frank I, ‘The Question of Constitutional Fidelity: Rawls on the Reason of Constitutional Courts’, in Silje A Langvatn, Mattias Kumm and Wojciech Sadurski (eds), Public Reason and Courts (CUP, Cambridge, 2020) 90
• Möllers, Christoph, ‘Legality, Legitimacy, and Legitimation of the Federal Constitutional Court’, in Matthias Jestaedt and others, The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court Without Limits (Jeff Seitzer tr, OUP, Oxford, 2020) 131
• Möllers, Christoph, ‘Why There Is No Governing with Judges’, 30 September 2014, p 30, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2503729
• Möllers, Christoph, Freiheitsgrade: Elemente einer liberalen politischen Mechanik (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2020)
• Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (OUP, Oxford, 2013)
• Monaghan, Henry Paul, ‘The Confirmation Process: Law or Politics?’, 101 Harv L Rev 1202 (1988)
• Mondak, Jeffery J, and Smithey, Shannon I, ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court’, 59 J Pol 1114 (1997)
• Montag, Jerzy, ‘Transparenz und Legitimität: Notwendige Reform der Wahl der Richterinnen und Richter zum Bundesverfassungsgericht’, 44 Recht und Politik 139 (2008)
• Müller, Reinhard, ‘Es allen recht machen’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 3 November 2010, available at https://perma.cc/8VT8-N4EQ
• Müller, Reinhard, ‘Ohne Karlsruhe geht es nicht’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 6 September 2021, p 1
• Münch, Richard, ‘Luhmann und Parsons’, in Oliver Jahraus and others (eds), Luhmann-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (JB Metzler, Stuttgart, 2012)
• Murphy, John W, ‘Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann: Two Versions of the “Social System”’, 12 Int Rev Mod Soc 291 (1982)
• Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York, 1944)
• Nash, Jonathan R, ‘Prejudging Judges’, 106 Colum L Rev 2168 (2006)
• Nelson, Michael J, and Tucker, Patrick, ‘The Stability and Durability of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy’, 83 J Pol 767 (2021)
• Noel, Hans, Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America (CUP, New York, 2013)
• Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Blackwell, Oxford, 1974)
• O’Scannlain, Diarmuid F, ‘Today’s Senate Confirmation Battles and the Role of the Federal Judiciary’, 27 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 169 (2003)
• Offe, Claus, ‘Politische Legitimation durch Mehrheitsentscheidung?’, in Bernd Guggenberger and Claus Offe (eds), An den Grenzen der Mehrheitsdemokratie: Politik und Soziologie der Mehrheitsregel (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1984) 150
• Olsen, Jonathan, ‘The Left Party and the AfD’, 36 German Pol & Soc’y 70 (2018)
• Ossenbühl, Fritz, ‘§ 15: Grundsätze der Grundrechtsinterpretation’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 595
• Owen, Diana, and Dennis, Jack, ‘Gender Differences in the Politicization of American Children’, 8 Women & Pol 23 (1988)
• Palonen, Kari, ‘Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization’, 28 Alternatives 171 (2003)
• Parsons, Talcott, and others, ‘Some Fundamental Categories of the Theory of Action: A General Statement’, in Talcott Parsons and Edward A Shils (eds), Toward a General Theory of Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1962) 3
• Parsons, Talcott, The Social System (The Free Press, Glencoe, 1951)
• Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (Free Press, Glencoe, 1949)
• Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1989)
• Perry, Michael J, The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? (OUP, New York, 1994)
• Peter, Fabienne, ‘Political Legitimacy’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legitimacy/#PubReaDemApp (last accessed 17 November 2021)
• Peter, Fabienne, ‘The Grounds of Political Legitimacy’, 6 J Am Phil Ass’n 372 (2020)
• Pildes, Richard H, ‘Why The Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America’, 99 Cal L Rev 273 (2011)
• Poscher, Ralf, Grundrechte als Abwehrrechte – Reflexive Regelung rechtlich geordneter Freiheit (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2003)
• Posner, Richard A, ‘Foreword: A Political Court’, 119 Harv L Rev 32 (2005)
• Post, Robert, ‘Theorizing Disagreement: Reconceiving the Relationship Between Law and Politics’, 98 Cal L Rev 1319 (2010)
• Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy’, 92 Cal L Rev 1027 (2004)
• Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva, ‘Questioning Justice: Law and Politics in Judicial Confirmation Hearings’, 115 Yale LJ Pocket Part 38 (2006)
• Prantl, Heribert, ‘Der lachende Vierte’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 February 2020, available at https://perma.cc/7GW8-RW58
• Prantl, Heribert, ‘Politische Entpolitisierung: Die Union beruft einen Spitzenrichter für weniger Einmischung’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 25 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/5KQE-98JH
• Preuß, Ulrich K, ‘Die Wahl der Bundesverfassungsrichter als verfassungsrechtliches und -politisches Problem’, 21 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 389 (1988)
• Quong, Jonathan, Liberalism without Perfection (OUP, Oxford, 2010)
• Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R, ‘On the Concept of Function in Social Science’, 37 Am Anthropologist 394 (1935)
• Ramage, Magnus, and Shipp, Karen, Systems Thinkers (2nd edn, Springer, Milton Keynes, 2020)
• Ramirez, Mark D, ‘Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court’, 29 Pol Psychol 675 (2008)
• Rasch, William, Niklas Luhmann’s Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2000)
• Rawls, John, ‘Reply to Habermas’, 92 J Phil 132 (1995)
• Rawls, John, ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, 64 U Chi L Rev 765 (1997)
• Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York, 1996)
• Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority and Justification’, in Joseph Raz (ed), Authority (New York University Press, New York, 1990) 115
• Raz, Joseph, ‘Disagreement in Politics’, 43 Am J Juris 25 (1998)
• Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (OUP, Oxford, 1999)
• Reidy, John A, ‘Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough’, 6 Res Publica 49 (2000)
• Rennert, Klaus, ‘Legitimation und Legitimität des Richters’, 70 JuristenZeitung 529 (2015)
• Richter, Paul, ‘Clinton Picks Moderate Judge Breyer for Supreme Court Spot’, Los Angeles Times, 14 May 1994, available at https://perma.cc/S68E-N546
• Ringhand, Lori A, ‘Judicial Activism: An Empirical Examination of Voting Behavior on the Rehnquist Natural Court’, 24 Const Comment 43 (2007)
• Roberts, Dorothy E, ‘The Meaning of Blacks’ Fidelity to the Constitution’, 65 Fordham L Rev 1761 (1997)
• Robertson, David, The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010)
• Robson, Ruthann, ‘Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom’, 30 U Haw L Rev 1 (2007)
• Roellecke, Gerd, ‘Zum Problem einer Reform der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 56 JuristenZeitung 114 (2001)
• Rogowski, Jon C, and Stone, Andrew R, ‘How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court’, 51 Brit J Pol Sci 1251 (2021)
• Rogowski, Ralf, ‘Constitutional courts as autopoietic organisations’, in Michael Wrase and Christian Boulanger (eds), Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts: Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2013) 123
• Rogowski, Ralf, and Gawron, Thomas (eds), Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court (2nd edn, Berghahn, New York, 2016)
• Rosanvallon, Pierre, La légitimité démocratique: Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité (Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 2008)
• Rosenberg, Gerald N, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991)
• Rosenfeld, Michel, Just Interpretations: Law between Ethics and Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998)
• Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Niklas Luhmann on the Autonomy of the Legal System’, 23 Law & Soc’y Rev 779 (1989)
• Rottleuthner, Hubert, ‘Zur Soziologie richterlichen Handelns (II)’, 4 Kritische Justiz 60 (1971)
• Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Das Frauenbild des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, 14 Querelles: Jahrbuch für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung 191 (2009)
• Sacksofsky, Ute, ‘Wenn Rechtfertigungen brüchig werden: Verfassungsgerichte in der Diskriminierungsbekämpfung am Beispiel der Geschlechterordnung vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht’, in Rainer Forst and Klaus Günther (eds), Normative Ordnungen (Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2021) 604
• Sadurski, Wojciech, Equality and Legitimacy (OUP, Oxford, 2008)
• Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (2nd edn, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014)
• Sager, Lawrence G, ‘The Incorrigible Constitution’, 65 NYU L Rev 893 (1990)
• Schauer, Frederick, ‘The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience’, 117 Harv L Rev 1765 (2004)
• Scheb, John M II, and Lyons, William, ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’, 81 Soc Sci 928 (2000)
• Scheid, Christopher, ‘Demokratieimmanente Legitimation der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, 59 Der Staat 227 (2020)
• Schelsky, Helmut, ‘Systemfunktionaler, anthropologischer und personfunktionaler Ansatz der Rechtssoziologie’, in Rüdiger Lautmann, Werner Maihofer and Helmut Schelsky (eds), Die Funktion des Rechts in der modernen Gesellschaft (Bertelsmann-Universitätsverlag, Bielefeld, 1970) 61
• Schlink, Bernhard, ‘Proportionality’, in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP, Oxford, 2012) 718
• Schmitt, Carl, ‘Der Hüter der Verfassung’, 55 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 161 (1929)
• Schmitt, Carl, ‘The Concept of the Political’, in The Concept of the Political (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007) 19
• Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (10th edn, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2017 [1923])
• Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (George Schwab tr, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)
• Schoenherr, Jessica A, Lane, Elizabeth A, and Armaly, Miles T, ‘The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings’, 8 J Law & Cts 333 (2020)
• Schreier, Nicole, Demokratische Legitimation von Verfassungsrichtern: Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse am Beispiel des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des United States Supreme Court (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016)
• Schröder, Meinhard, ‘Verfassungsrichterwahl im transparenten Konsens?’, 30 Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung 150 (2015)
• Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Art. 103 Abs. 3’, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (3rd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2018)
• Schütz, Alfred, ‘Das Problem der transzendentalen Intersubjektivität bei Husserl’, 5 Philosophische Rundschau 81 (1957)
• Schwartzman, Micah, ‘The Etiquette of Animus’, 132 Harv L Rev 133 (2018)
• Segal, Jeffrey A, and Spaeth, Harold A, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (CUP, Cambridge, 2002)
• Seib, Gerald F, ‘Supreme Court Opening Adds to Pressure on American Institutions’, The Wall Street Journal, 21 September 2020, available at https://perma.cc/HEH6-AY5H
• Serwer, Adam, ‘Obamacare’s Supreme Court Disaster’, Mother Jones, 27 March 2012, available at https://perma.cc/7PYZ-8SGW
• Shapiro, Martin, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981)
• Shear, Michael D, and Kanno-Youngs, Zolan, ‘As Leak Theories Circulate, Supreme Court Marshal Takes Up Investigation’, The New York Times, 4 May 2022, available at https://perma.cc/6EDP-4ZUJ
• Simmons, A John, ‘Justification and Legitimacy’, 109 Ethics 739 (1999)
• Simon, Herbert A, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science’, 49 Am Econ Rev 253 (1959)
• Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (D D Raphael and A L Macfie eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1976 [1759])
• Soley, Ximena, and Steininger, Silvia, ‘Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, 14 Int’l JL in Context 237 (2018)
• Solomons, David, ‘The Politicization of Accounting’, 146 J Accountancy 65 (1978)
• Sólyom, László, ‘The Constitutional Court of Hungary’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 357
• Somek, Alexander, ‘Zwei Welten der Rechtslehre und die Philosophie des Rechts’, 71 JuristenZeitung 481 (2016)
• Somin, Ilya, ‘Political Ignorance and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: A New Perspective on the Central Obsession of Constitutional Theory’, 89 Iowa L Rev 1287 (2004)
• Stone Sweet, Alec, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (OUP, Oxford, 2000)
• Stone, Adrienne, ‘Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review’, 28 Ox J Legal Stud 1 (2008)
• Stone, Geoffrey R, ‘Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations’, 2010 Sup Ct Rev 381 (2010)
• Strauss, David A, and Sunstein, Cass R, ‘The Senate, the Constitution, and the Confirmation Process’, 101 Yale LJ 1491 (1992)
• Šubrt, Jiří, The Systemic Approach in Sociology and Niklas Luhmann: Expectations, Discussions, Doubts (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, 2020)
• Sunstein, Cass R, ‘Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided’, 110 Harv L Rev 4 (1996)
• Sunstein, Cass R, The Partial Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1993)
• Táíwò, Olúfémi O, ‘Being-in-the-Room Privilege: Elite Capture and Epistemic Deference’, 108 The Philosopher (2020), available at https://perma.cc/74FG-9D5L
• Talbot, Margaret, ‘Amy Coney Barrett’s Long Game’, The New Yorker, 7 February 2022, available at https://perma.cc/8F35-3RSW
• Tau, Byron, and Hughes, Siobhan, ‘Senate Eliminates Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees’, The Wall Street Journal, 6 April 2017, available at https://perma.cc/DEC8-AANV
• Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Politics in the Bork Battle; Opinion Polls and Campaign-Style Pressure May Change Supreme Court Confirmations’, The New York Times, 28 September 1987, available at https://perma.cc/EPU6-59E5
• Taylor, Stuart Jr, ‘Scalia’s Views, Stylishly Expressed, Line Up with Reagan’s’, The New York Times, 19 June 1986, available at https://perma.cc/KT9K-JS75
• Thayer, James B, ‘The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’, 7 Harv L Rev 129 (1893/1894)
• Thompson, Dennis F, Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002)
• Thornhill, Chris, ‘Luhmann and Marx: Social Theory and Social Freedom’, in Anders la Cour and Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (eds), Luhmann Observed: Radical Theoretical Encounters (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 2013) 263
• Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann, Carl Schmitt and the Modern Form of the Political’, 10 Eur J Soc Theory 499 (2007)
• Thornhill, Chris, ‘Niklas Luhmann: A Sociological Transformation of Political Legitimacy?’, 7 Scandinavian J Soc Theory 33 (2006)
• Thornhill, Chris, Political Theory in Modern Germany: An Introduction (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000)
• Tilly, Charles, Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998)
• Toobin, Jeffrey, ‘Swing Shift: How Anthony Kennedy’s passion for foreign law could change the Supreme Court’, The New Yorker, 12 September 2005, available at https://perma.cc/6MSW-3G5W
• Totenberg, Nina, ‘170-Plus Days And Counting: GOP Unlikely To End Supreme Court Blockade Soon’, npr.org, 6 September 2016, available at https://perma.cc/DSN9-BFK7
• Tribe, Laurence H, American Constitutional Law (2nd edn, Foundation Press, Mineola, 1988)
• Troper, Michel, ‘The logic of justification of judicial review’, 1 Int’l J Con L 99 (2003)
• Tuleja, Piotr, ‘The Polish Constitutional Tribunal’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 619
• Turner, Ralph H, ‘Role-Taking: Process Versus Conformity’, in Arnold M Rose (ed), Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1962) 20
• Tushnet, Mark, ‘Constitutional Interpretation, Character, and Experience’, 72 B U L Rev 747 (1992)
• Tushnet, Mark, ‘How Different Are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review?’, 30 Ox J Legal Stud 49 (2010)
• Tushnet, Mark, ‘The Constitution Outside the Courts: A Preliminary Inquiry’, 26 Val U L Rev 437 (1992)
• Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999)
• Tyler, Tom R, ‘Legal socialization: Back to the future’, 77 J Soc Issues 663 (2021)
• Tyler, Tom R, and Mitchell, Gregory, ‘Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights’, 43 Duke LJ 703 (1994)
• Tyler, Tom R, and Trinkner, Rick, Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy (OUP, New York, 2018)
• Tyler, Tom R, Why People Obey the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006)
• Varela, Francisco, Maturana, Humberto, and Uribe, Ricardo, ‘Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model’, 5 BioSystems 187 (1974)
• Verschraegen, Gert, ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, 29 J Law & Soc’y 258 (2002)
• Viskovatoff, Alex, ‘Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems’, 29 Phil Soc Sci 481 (1999)
• Volcansek, Mary L, ‘Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Courts in New Democracies?’, in Christine Landfried (ed), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (CUP, Cambridge, 2019) 66
• Volkmann, Uwe, ‘Bausteine zu einer demokratischen Theorie der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, in Michael Bäuerle, Philipp Dann and Astrid Wallrabenstein, Demokratie-Perspektiven: Festschrift für Brun-Otto Bryde zum 70. Geburtstag (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2013) 119
• von Bertalanffy, Ludwig, General System Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications (George Braziller, New York, 1968)
• von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Das Öffentliche im Völkerrecht im Lichte von Schmitts „Begriff des Politischen“: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Theoriebildung im Öffentlichen Recht’, 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Heidelberg J Int’l L) 877 (2017)
• von Bogdandy, Armin, Grabenwarter, Christoph, and Huber, Peter M, ‘Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space’, in Armin von Bogdandy, Christoph Grabenwarter and Peter M Huber (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, vol 3 (OUP, Oxford, 2020) 1
• Voßkuhle, Andreas, ‘Art. 94’, in Hermann von Mangoldt, Friedrich Klein and Christian Starck (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, vol 3 (7th edn, CH Beck, Munich, 2018)
• Wagner, Aiko, ‘Typwechsel 2017? Vom moderaten zum polarisierten Pluralismus’, 50 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 114 (2019)
• Wagschal, Uwe, ‘Der Parteienstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Parteipolische Zusammensetzung seiner Schlüsselinstitutionen’, 32 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 861 (2001)
• Wahl, Rainer, ‘§ 19: Die objektiv-rechtliche Dimension der Grundrechte im internationalen Vergleich’, in Detlef Merten and others (eds), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, vol 1 (CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2004) 745
• Wahlke, John C, ‘Policy Demands and System Support: the Role of the Represented’, 1 Brit J Pol Sci 271 (1971)
• Waldron, Jeremy, ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’, 13 Oxford J Legal Stud 18 (1993)
• Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?’, 123 Yale LJ 1692 (2014)
• Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Judges as moral reasoners’, 7 Int’l J Con L 2 (2009)
• Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, 115 Yale LJ 1346 (2006)
• Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism’, 37 Phil Q 127 (1987)
• Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (OUP, Oxford, 1999)
• Walter, Christian, ‘Art. 94’, in Günter Dürig and others (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (loose-leaf, 95th delivery, CH Beck, Munich, 2021)
• Waluchow, Wilfrid, ‘On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning’, in Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso and Diego M Papayannis (eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) 203
• Wasserstrom, Richard A, The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1961)
• Weber, Max, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, in The Vocation Lectures (David Owen and Tracy B Strong eds, Rodney Livingstone tr, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 2004 [1919])
• Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society, vol 1 (Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich eds, Ephraim Fischoff and others tr, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978) 37
• Wefing, Heinrich, ‘Etwas zu politisch?’, Die Zeit, 14 November 2018, available at https://perma.cc/EY5X-YZH3
• Weiden, David L, ‘Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia’, 62 Pol Res Q 335 (2011)
• Weiss, Carol H, ‘The Politicization of Evaluation Research’, 26 J Soc Issues 57 (1970)
• Weiß, Johannes, ‘Legitimationsbegriff und Legitimationsleistung der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns’, 18 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 74 (1977)
• Wenar, Leif, ‘John Rawls’, in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/ (last accessed 30 September 2021)
• Wiefelspütz, Dieter, ‘Die Bundesverfassungsrichter werden vom Deutschen Bundestag direkt gewählt!’, 65 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 961 (2012)
• Wiesner, Claudia, ‘Rethinking politicisation as a multi-stage and multilevel concept’, 18 Contemp Pol Theory 255 (2019)
• Woodson, Benjamin, ‘Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions’, 3 J Law & Cts 193 (2015)
• Wright, Susan, ‘The Politicization of “Culture”’, 14 Anthropology Today 7 (1998)
• Zelditch, Morris Jr, ‘Theories of Legitimacy’, in John T Jost and Brenda Major (eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (CUP, Cambridge, 2001)
• Zeleny, Milan, ‘Self-Organization of Living Systems: A Formal Model of Autopoiesis’, 4 Int’l J General Sys 13 (1977)
• Zilis, Michael A, ‘Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness’, 71 Pol Res Q 270 (2018)
• Zuck, Rüdiger, ‘Politische Sekundärtugenden: Über die Kunst, Pakete zu schnüren’, 47 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 497 (1994)
• Zürn, Michael, ‘Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels’, 26 J Eur Pub Pol’y 977 (2019)
• Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, ‘International authority and its politicization’, 4 Int’l Theory 69 (2012)