Future Regulation of Cross-Border Audiovisual Content Dissemination

Schlagworte

country of origin EMFA EU critical analysis EU-AVMS Richtlinie cross-border audio-visual content distribution EU-AVMS Directive European Media Freedom Act grenzüberschreitende audio-visuelle Inhaltsverbreitung law enforcement Herkunftsland legal systems kritische Analyse rights sectoral EU legislation Rechte Rechtsdurchsetzung values Rechtssysteme sektorale EU-Gesetzgebung Werte

• Apa/Gangemi, The promotion of European works by audiovisual media service providers, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 326–351.
• Bajomi-Lazar/Stetka/Sükösd, Public Service Television in European Union Countries: Old Issues, New Challenges in the ‘East’ and the ‘West’, in: Just/Puppis (eds.), Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects, 2012, pp. 355–380.
• Broughton Micova, The Audiovisual Media Services Directive, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 264–281.
• Buiten, The Digital Services Act from Intermediary Liability to Platform Regulation, JIPITEC 12(2021)5, 361.
• Buri, A Regulator Caught Between Conflicting Policy Objectives, in: Verfassungsblog, 31 October 2022, https://verfassungsblog.de/dsa-conflicts-commission/.
• Cabrera Blázquez, The implementation of EU sanctions against RT and Sputnik, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2022, https://rm.coe.int/note-rt-sputnik/1680a5dd5d.
• Cabrera Blázquez/Cappello/Talavera Milla/Valais, Governance and independence of public service media, IRIS Plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, February 2022, https://rm.coe.int/iris-plus-2022en1-governance-and-independence-of-public-service-media/1680a59a76.
• Cabrera Blázquez/Denis/Machet/McNulty, Media regulatory authorities and the challenges of cooperation, IRIS Plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, December 2021, https://rm.coe.int/iris-plus-2021en2-media-regulatory-authorities-and-the-challenges-of-c/1680a55eb1.
• Cabrera Blázquez/Cappello/Chochon/Fontaine/Talavera Milla/Valais, The European audiovisual industry in the time of COVID-19, European Audiovisual Observatory, June 2020, https://rm.coe.int/iris-plus-2020-2-the-european-audiovisual-industry-in-the-time-of-covi/16809f9a46.
• Cabrera Blázquez/Cappello/Fontaine/Talavera Milla/Valais, Brexit: The impact on the audiovisual sector, IRIS Plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2018, https://rm.coe.int/brexit-the-impact-on-the-audiovisual-sector/16808f064f.
• Cabrera Blázquez/Cappello/Grece/Valais, Commercial communications in the AVMSD revision, IRIS Plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2017, https://rm.coe.int/168078348c.
• Cantero Gamito, The European Media Freedom Act (Emfa) as Meta-Regulation, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4137170.
• Cappello (ed.), Transparency of media ownership, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2021, https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2021-02en-transparency-of-media-ownership/1680a57bf0.
• Cappello (ed.), Unravelling the Digital Services Act package, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2021, https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2021-01en-dsa-package/1680a43e45.
• Cappello (ed.), Self- and Co-regulation in the new AVMSD, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2019, https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2019-2-self-and-co-regulation-in-the-new-avmsd/1680992dc2.
• Cappello (ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2019, https://rm.coe.int/the-independence-of-media-regulatory-authorities-in-europe/168097e504.
• Cappello (ed.), Media law enforcement without frontiers, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2018, https://rm.coe.int/media-law-enforcement-without-frontiers/1680907efe.
• Cappello (ed.), Journalism and media privilege, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2017, https://rm.coe.int/journalism-and-media-privilege-pdf/1680787381.
• Cappello (ed.), Media coverage of elections: the legal framework in Europe, IRIS Special, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2017, https://rm.coe.int/16807834b2.
• Cappello (ed.), Media ownership – Market realities and regulatory responses, IRIS Special 2016–2, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2016, https://rm.coe.int/media-ownership-market-realities-and-regulatory-responses/168078996c.
• Cappello (ed.), The protection of minors in a converged media environment, IRIS plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2015, https://rm.coe.int/1680783486.
• Carlini/Bleyer-Simon, Media Economy in the Pandemic: A European Perspective, Research Project Report RSCAS/Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, 2021/01, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/71004/Media%20economy%20in%20the%20pandemic%20-%20A%20European%20perspective.pdf?sequence=1.
• Castendyk/Dommering/Scheuer (eds.), European Media Law, 2008.
• Cavaliere, Who’s sovereign? The AVMSD’s country of origin principle and video-sharing platforms, in: Journal of Digital Media & Policy 2(2021)3, pp. 407–423, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3986101.
• Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF)/European University Institute/Centre for Information Technology and Intellectual Property (CiTiP) of KU Leuven/Institute for Information Law of the University of Amsterdam (IViR/UvA)/Vrije Universiteit Brussels (Studies in Media, Innovation and Technology, VUB-SMIT), Study on media plurality and diversity online, Final Report, 2022, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/475bacb6-34a2-11ed-8b77-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-266745163.
• Cole, Gestaltungsspielraum der EU-Mitgliedstaaten bei Einschränkungen der Dienstleistungsfreiheit, in: AfP 2021, p. 1–7.
• Cole, Zum Gestaltungsspielraum der EU-Mitgliedstaaten bei Einschränkungen der Dienstleistungsfreiheit. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel einer Regelung bezüglich der Medienvielfalt in Deutschland, 2020, https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Zum-Gestaltungsspielraum-der-EU-Mitgliedstaaten-bei-Einschr%C3%A4nkungen-der-Dienstleistungsfreiheit.pdf.
• Cole, The AVMSD Jurisdiction Criteria concerning Audiovisual Media Service Providers after the 2018 Reform, 2018, https://emr-sb.de/study-avmsd-jurisdiction-criteria/.
• Cole, Overview of the impact of the proposed EU Digital Services Act Package on broadcasting in Europe, https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/EMR_Legal-Issue-Paper-DSA-DMA-and-Broadcasting.pdf.
• Cole, Note d’observations, « Roj TV » entre ordre public et principe du pays d’origine, in: Revue du Droit des Technologies de l’Information (RDTI) 2012, pp. 50–61.
• Cole, The Country of Origin Principle – From State Sovereignty under Public International Law to Inclusion in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive of the European Union, in: Meng/Ress/Stein (eds.), Europäische Integration und Globalisierung – Festschrift zum 60-jährigen Bestehen des Europa-Instituts, 2011, pp. 113–130.
• Cole/Etteldorf, Research for CULT Committee – European Media Freedom Act - Background Analysis, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, 2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2023)733129.
• Cole/Etteldorf, The implementation of the GDPR into national law in light of coherence and consistency, in: Graef/vam der Sloot (eds.), The Legal Consistency of Technology Regulation in Europe (forthcoming).
• Cole/Etteldorf, Research for CULT Committee – Implementation of the revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive – Background Analysis of the main aspects of the 2018 AVMSD revision, 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2022)733100.
• Cole/Etteldorf, Research for CULT Committee – The Implementation and Future of the revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Policy Recommendations, 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_BRI(2022)733099.
• Cole/Etteldorf/Ullrich, Cross-border Dissemination of Online Content, Current and Possible Future Regulation of the Online Environment with a Focus on the EU E-Commerce Directive, in: Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW (ed. 81), 2020, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748906438.
• Cole/Etteldorf/Ullrich, Updating the Rules for Online Content Dissemination, Legislative Options of the European Union and the Digital Services Act Proposal, in: Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW (ed. 83), 2021, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748925934.
• Cole/Iacino/Matzneller/Metzdorf/Schweda, AVMS-RADAR: AudioVisual Media Services – Regulatory Authorities’ Independence and Efficiency Review, Update on recent changes and developments in Member States and Candidate Countries that are relevant for the analysis of independence and efficient functioning of audiovisual media services regulatory bodies (SMART 2013/0083), study prepared for the Commission DG CNECT by the EMR and the University of Luxembourg, available at https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/20170117_Abgeschlossene-Gutachten_AVMS-RADARSchlussbericht.pdf.
• Cole/Ukrow/Etteldorf, On the Allocation of Competences between the European Union and its Member States in the Media Sector. An Analysis with particular Consideration of Measures concerning Media Pluralism, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748924975.
• Cole/Ukrow/Etteldorf, Audiovisual Sector and Brexit: the Regulatory Environment, Research for CULT Committee, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, 2018, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/629177/IPOL_STU(2018)629177_EN.pdf.
• Colomina/Sanchéz Margalef/Youngs, The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world, study requested by the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights, 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_STU(2021)653635.
• Cornils, Designing Platform Governance: A Normative Perspective on Needs, Strategies, and Tools to Regulate Intermediaries, Algorithm Watch, 2020, https://algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Governing-Platforms-legal-study-Cornils-May-2020-AlgorithmWatch.pdf.
• Deloitte/SMIT, Study on the implementation of the new provisions in the revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), Final report (SMART 2018/0066 – Part D), 2021, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6d536c6f-5c68-11eb-b487-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
• de Streel/Broughton Micova, Digital Services Act: Deepening the internal market and clarifying responsibilities for digital services 1/43, December 2020, https://cerre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CERRE_DSA_Deepening-the-internal-market-and-clarifying-responsibilities-for-digital-services_Full-report_December2020.pdf.
• de Streel/Defreyne/Jacquemin/Ledger/Innesti/Goubet/Ustowski, Online Platforms’ Moderation of Illegal Content Online, study for the committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652718/IPOL_STU(2020)652718_EN.pdf.
• de Streel/Husovec, The e-commerce Directive as the cornerstone of the Internal Market. Assessment and options for reform, Luxembourg, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648797/IPOL_STU(2020)648797_EN.pdf.
• Diaz Crego/Manko/van Ballegooij, Protecting EU common values within the Member States. An overview of monitoring, prevention and enforcement mechanisms at EU level, EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652088/EPRS_STU(2020)652088_EN.pdf.
• Dragomir/Söderström, The State of State Media. A Global Analysis of the Editorial Independence of State Media and an Introduction of a New State Media Typology, 2021, https://cmds.ceu.edu/sites/cmcs.ceu.hu/files/attachment/article/2091/thestateofstatemedia.pdf.
• Dreyer/Heyer/Seipp/Schulz, The European Communication (Dis)Order. Mapping the media-relevant European legislative acts and identification of dependencies, interface areas and conflicts, Hamburg, June 2020 (Working Papers of the HBI No. 52), https://hans-bredow-institut.de/uploads/media/default/cms/media/8engbt7_AP52BKM_Mapping-Gutachten_en.pdf.
• Dörr, Die Bestimmung des § 58 des Saarländischen Mediengesetzes (SMG) und die Vorgaben der Rundfunkfreiheit des Art. 5 Abs. 1 Satz 2 des Grundgesetzes (GG), Kurzgutachten im Auftrag der Bundestagsfraktionen Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 2020, https://www.gruene-bundestag.de/fileadmin/media/gruenebundestag_de/themen_az/medien/pdf/gutachten-direktorinnen-wahl-landesmedienanstalt.pdf.
• Dörr, Der Grundsatz der Staatsferne und die Zusammensetzung der Rundfunkgremien, in: Rechtspolitisches Forum 54, 2010, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-333606.
• Etteldorf, Frankreich: Regulierungsbehörde veröffentlicht Bericht zum Umgang von Plattformen mit Desinformation, in: MMR-Aktuell 2021, 443156.
• European Audiovisual Observatory, Mapping report on the rules applicable to video-sharing platforms – Focus on commercial communications, 2022, https://rm.coe.int/mapping-on-video-sharing-platforms-2022-focus-on-cc/1680aa1b15.
• European Audiovisual Observatory, Mapping of national rules applicable to video-sharing platforms: Illegal and harmful content online, 2021, https://rm.coe.int/mapping-on-video-sharing-platforms-2021-full-report/1680a43575; 2022 update available at https://rm.coe.int/mapping-on-video-sharing-platforms-2022-update/1680aa1b16.
• European Parliament: The Future of Money, study for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2019, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/642364/IPOL_STU(2019)642364_EN.pdf.
• European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Transposition of the 2018 Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Implementation in Action, 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2022/730354/EPRS_IDA(2022)730354_EN.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (Subgroup 1), Consistent implementation and enforcement of the new AVMSD framework, Final Overview, 2021, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ERGA-SG1-2021-Final-Overview-Report.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (Subgroup 1), Guidance and recommendations concerning implementation of Article 28b, deliverable for the report on consistent implementation and enforcement of the new AVMSD framework, 2021, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ERGA-SG1-2021-Report-Article-28b-1.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (Action Group 2), Economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the media and audiovisual sectors, 2021, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ERGA-AG2-2021-Report-Economic-impact-of-the-COVID-19-crisis-on-the-media-and-audiovisual-sectors.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services, Memorandum of Understanding between the national regulatory authority members of the European Regulatory Group for Audiovisual Media, dated 3 December 2020, 2020, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ERGA_Memorandum_of_Understanding_adopted_03-12-2020_l.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (Subgroup 3), Implementation of the revised AVMS Directive, Final Report, 2020, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ERGA_2019_SG3_Report-1.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (Subgroup 3, Taskforce 2), Video-Sharing Platforms under the new AVMS Directive, Annex 2 to Final Report of Subgroup 3, 2020, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ERGA_2019_SG3_Report_Annex-II_TF2-Paper.pdf.
• European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services, Report on the protection of minors in a converged environment, 2016, https://erga-online.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/report_minors_2015.pdf.
• Hain, Das Gebot der Unionsferne der Medien, in: Cole/Schiedmair/Wagner (eds.), Die Entfaltung von Freiheit im Rahmen des Rechts, 2022, pp. 433–440.
• Harrison/Woods, Jurisdiction, forum shopping and the ‘race to the bottom’, Cambridge, 2007.
• Helberger/Pierson/Poell, Governing Online Platforms: Form Contested to Cooperative Responsibility, in: The Information Society, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 1–14.
• Hoffmann/Gasparotti, Liability for illegal content online – Weaknesses of the EU legal framework and possible plans of the EU Commission to address them in a “Digital Services Act”, cepStudy, 2020, https://www.cep.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/hayek-stiftung.de/cepStudy_Liability_for_illegal_content_online.pdf.
• Hörnle, Country of Origin Regulation in Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond the Freedom to Provide Services?, in: International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, Issue 1, 2005, pp. 89–126.
• Kokoly, Exceptions to the Principle of Free Transmission and Retransmission of Audiovisual Media Content – Recent European Case-Law, in: Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2020, pp. 83–103, http://dx.doi.org/10.47745/AUSLEG.2020.9.1.05.
• Kokoly, The Anti-Circumvention Procedure in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, in Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 43-64.
• Koltay (ed.), Media Freedom and Regulation in the New Media World, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2014.
• Kukliš, Video-sharing platforms in AVMSD: a new kind of content regulation, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 303–325.
• Le Moli, The Principle of Human Dignity in International Law, in: Brill/Nijhoff (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law, 2019, pp. 352–368, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390935_021.
• Lehofer, EuG: Keine Nichtigerklärung der Sanktionen gegen RT France, in: blog.lehofer.at, 29 July 2022, https://blog.lehofer.at/2022/07/EuG-RT.html.
• Lehofer, Kurzes Update zu den Sanktionen gegen russische Staatsmedien, in: blog.lehofer.at, 9 June 2022, https://blog.lehofer.at/2022/06/sanktionen-update.html.
• Lehofer, Überwachen, Blocken, Delisten – Zur Reichweite der EU-Sanktionen gegen RT und Sputnik, in: blog.lehofer.at, 22 March 2022, https://blog.lehofer.at/2022/03/uberwachen-blocken-delisten.html.
• Lievens, Protecting Children in the Digital Era: The Use of Alternative Regulatory Instruments, Leiden/Boston, 2010.
• Lomba/Evas, Digital services act. European added value assessment, study of the European Parliamentary Research Services, Brussels, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/654180/EPRS_STU(2020)654180_EN.pdf.
• Lotz, The Multifaceted Policy Challenges of Transnational Internet-Distributed Television, in: Journal of Digital Media & Policy, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 27–31.
• Madiega, Reform of the EU liability regime for online intermediaries. Background on the forthcoming digital services act, in-depth analysis of the European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussel, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2020/649404/EPRS_IDA(2020)649404_EN.pdf.
• Mataija, The European competition network and the shaping of EU competition policy, in: Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 75–101.
• McGonagle, “Fake news”: False fears or real concerns?, in: Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 2017, pp. 203–209.
• Montagnani/Trapova, New Obligations for Internet Intermediaries in the Digital Single Market — Safe Harbors in Turmoil?, in: Journal of Internet Law (JIL), Vol. 22, Issue 7, January 2019, pp. 3–11.
• Mustert, The EDPB’s second Article 65 Decision – Is the Board Stepping up its Game?, in: EDPL, Vol. 7, Issue 3, 2021, pp. 416–422.
• Nordemann, The functioning of the internal market for digital services: Responsibilities and duties of care of providers of digital services, study for the European Parliament Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648802/IPOL_STU(2020)648802_EN.pdf.
• Ó Fathaigh/Voorhoof, Case Law, EU: RT France v. Council: General Court finds ban on Russia Today not a violation of right to freedom of expression, in: inforrm.org, 19 August 2022, https://inforrm.org/2022/08/19/case-law-eu-rt-france-v-council-general-court-finds-ban-on-russia-today-not-a-violation-of-right-to-freedom-of-expression-ronan-o-fathaigh-and-dirk-voorhoof/.
• Oruç, The Prohibition of General Monitoring Obligation for Video-Sharing Platforms under Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive in light of Recent Developments: Is it still necessary to maintain it?, JIPITEC, Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2022, pp. 176–199.
• Ory, Medienfreiheit – Der Entwurf eines European Media Freedom Act, in: ZRP, Vol. 56, Issue 1, 2023, 26–28.
• Panteia/VVA, Effectiveness of self- and co-regulation in the context of implementing the AVMS Directive, study prepared for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, 2016, https://op.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/df193e3d-294e-11e6-b616-01aa75ed71a1.
• Papaevangelou, The Non-Interference Principle”: Debating Online Platforms’ Treatment of Editorial Content in the EU’s Digital Services Act, 2023, https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03933538/document.
• Parcu et al., Study on media plurality and diversity online: final report, study conducted by European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/529019.
• Penney, Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study, in: Internet Policy Review, Vol. 6, Issue 2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.2.692.
• Petkova/Ojanen (eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online. The Future Regulation of Intermediaries, Cheltenham 2020.
• Pisarkiewicz/Polo, Old and new media: the interactions of merger control and plurality regulation, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 54–74.
• Psychogiopoulou, The Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the promotion of European works: cultural mainstreaming revisited, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 32–53.
• Quaglio/Miller, Potentially negative effects of internet use, In-depth analysis of the European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels 2020.
• Rozgonyi, Negotiating new audiovisual rules for video sharing platforms: proposals for a responsive governance model of speech online, Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, No. 61, 2021, pp. 83–98.
• Sardo, Categories, Balancing, and Fake News: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, in: Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 435–460, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.5.
• Seipp/Helberger/de Vreese/Ausloos, Dealing with Opinion Power in the Platform World: Why We Really Have to Rethink Media Concentration Law, in: Digital Journalism, Vol. 10, Issue 10, 2022, pp. 1605-1626, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2161924.
• Senden, Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet?, in: Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2005.
• Senden et al., Mapping Self- and Co-regulation Approaches in the EU Context, Explorative Study for the European Commission, DG Connect, 2015, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/327305.
• Schulz et al., INDIREG: Indicators for independence and efficient functioning of audiovisual media services regulatory bodies for the purpose of enforcing the rules in the AVMS Directive (SMART 2009/0001): final report, 2011, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/study-indicators-independence-and-efficient-functioning-audiovisual-media-services-regulatory.
• SMIT, Study on the implementation of the new provisions in the revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, final report, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/135983.
• Smith, Enforcement and cooperation between Member States in a Digital Services Act, study for the Committee on Internal Market, Policy Department A for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648780/IPOL_STU(2020)648780_EN.pdf.
• Sørensen, The Country‐of‐Origin Principle and Balancing Jurisdiction Between Home Member States and Host Member State, in: Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series 2019 No. 16–32.
• Sorban, The video-sharing platform paradox – Applicability of the new European rules in the intersection of globalisation and distinct Member State implementation, Communications Law, Vol. 25, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 89–100.
• Susi et al. (eds.), Governing Information Flows During War: A Comparative Study of Content Governance and Media Policy Responses After Russia’s Attack on Ukraine, GDHRNET Working Paper Series No. 4/2022, https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/78580/ssoar-2022-susi_et_al-Governing_Information_Flows_During_War.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2022-susi_et_al-Governing_Information_Flows_During_War.pdf.
• Tambini, The democratic fightback has begun: the European Commission’s new European Media Freedom Act, in: London School of Economics Blog, 16 September 2022, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/09/16/the-democratic-fightback-has-begun-the-european-commissions-new-european-media-freedom-act/.
• TIPIK Legal, Report on the implementation of specific provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Final report, study requested by Directorate – General for Justice and Consumers, 2022, https://www.dataguidance.com/sites/default/files/1609930170392.pdf.
• Ukrow, Die Vorschläge der EU-Kommission für einen Digital Services Act und einen Digital Markets Act. Darstellung von und erste Überlegungen zu zentralen Bausteinen für eine digitale Grundordnung der EU, in: Impulse aus dem EMR, 2021, https://emr-sb.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Impulse-aus-dem-EMR_DMA-und-DSA.pdf.
• Ukrow/Cole/Etteldorf, Stand und Entwicklung des internationalen Kinder- und Jugendmedienschutzes. Eine rechtswissenschaftliche Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung ausgewählter Staaten, 2023, https://www.kjm-online.de/fileadmin/user_upload/KJM/Publikationen/Studien_Gutachten/EMR_Stand_und_Entwicklung_des_internationalen_Kinder-_und_Jugendmedienschutzes.pdf.
• Ullrich, Unlawful Content Online: Towards a New Regulatory Framework for Online Platforms, Luxembourg 2020.
• Ullrich, A Risk-Based Approach towards Infringement Prevention on the Internet: Adopting the Anti-Money Laundering Framework to Online Platforms, in: IJLIT, Vol. 26, 2018, pp. 226–251.
• Valcke/Lambrecht, The evolving scope of application of the AVMS Directive, in: Parcu/Brogi (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, 2021, pp. 282–302.
• Vamialis, Online Defamation: Confronting Anonymity, in: IJLIT, Vol. 21, 2013, pp. 56–62.
• van Drunen, The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility, in: Journal of Media Law, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067.
• van Drunen/Helberger/Fahy, The platform-media relationship in the European Media Freedom Act, in: Verfassungsblog, 13 February 2023, https://verfassungsblog.de/emfa-platforms/.
• van Hoboken/Quintas/Poort/van Eijk, Hosting intermediary services and illegal content online. An analysis of the scope of Article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape, SMART 2018/0033, Amsterdam, 2018, https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/hosting_intermediary_services.pdf.
• Vantaggiato/Kassim/Wright, Internal network structures as opportunity structures: control and effectiveness in the European competition network, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 28, Issue 4, 2021, pp. 571–590, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1737183.
• Vlassis, The review of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Many political voices for one digital Europe?, in: Politique européenne, Vol. 56, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 102–123.
• Voorhoof, EU silences Russian state media: a step in the wrong direction, in: inforrm.org, 8 May 2022, https://inforrm.org/2022/05/08/eu-silences-russian-state-media-a-step-in-the-wrong-direction-dirk-voorhoof/#more-52220.
• Voorhoof, The European Media Freedom Act and the protection of journalistic sources: still some way to go, in: Inforrms Blog, 2022, https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01GQ8T76A1KMC1P57A2NMBR2QK.
• Wagner/Janssen, A first impression of regulatory powers in the Digital Services Act, in: Verfassungsblog, 4 January 2021, https://verfassungsblog.de/regulatory-powers-dsa/.
• Weinand, Implementing the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Selected issues in the regulation of AVMS by national media authorities of France, Germany and the UK, in: Luxembourg Legal Studies, Vol. 13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845282473.
• Woods/Perrin, Online harm reduction – a statutory duty of care and regulator, 2019, https://d1ssu070pg2v9i.cloudfront.net/pex/carnegie_uk_trust/2019/04/08091652/Online-harm-reduction-a-statutory-duty-of-care-and-regulator.pdf.