Migration Impact Assessment

Schlagworte

civil society Integration economy Interessengruppen Machtasymmetrien integration Migration interest groups migration Migrationsstudien partizipative Praktiken migration studies participatory practices Politik Wirtschaft politics Zivilgesellschaft power asymmetries Partizipative Methoden Selbstevaluierung Participatory methods self-assessment

• 7. Bibliography
• Althaus, J., Grunwald, N., Kreuzer, V. (2009): Ortserkundung in der Raumplanung. Dortmund: IRPUD.
• Argyle, M. (2009): Social interaction. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
• Arnstein, S. (1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4), 216–224.
• Arnstein, S. (2019): A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association 85(1), 24–34.
• Azungah, T. (2018): Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. In: Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035 (accessed last: 17 July 2023).
• Atteslander, P. (2000): Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
• Bagnoli, A. (2009): Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. In: Qualitative Research. SAGE 9/5, 547–570.
• Batra, G., Uitto, J., Feinstein, O. (2022): Environmental Evaluation and Global Development Institutions. A Case Study of the Global Environment Facility. London, New York: Routledge.
• Baumann, F., Detlefsen, M. (2005): Open Space – oder: Kaffeepausen in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung. In: RaumPlanung 123, 249–253.
• Beazley, H., Ennew, J. (2006); Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 189–199.
• Bedford, T., Burgess, J. (2001): The focus group experience. In: Limb, M., Dwyer, C. (Eds.): Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers. London: Arnold. Pp. 121–136.
• Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (2009): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer Verlag.
• Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M. C., Rehaag, R., Schramm, E., Voß, J. (2005): QuaIitätskriterien transdiszipIinärer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden für die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten. Frankfurt: lnstitut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (lSOE) GmbH.
• Bergold, J., Thomas, S. (2012): Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 13(1), URL: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3335.
• Bennett, K. (2002): Interviews and Focus Groups. In: Shurmer-Smith, P. (Ed.): Doing Cultural Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 151–164.
• Bernard, H. R. (2006): Research Methods in Anthropology. Lanham: Altamira Press.
• Blackburn, J., Holland, J. (1998): Who changes: Institutionalizing participation in development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
• Blee, K.M. (2003): Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. London: University of California Press.
• Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., Riggs, E. (2013): Addressing Ethical and Methodological Challenges in Research with Refugee-background Young People: Reflections from the Field. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 26(1), 69–87.
• Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W. (2009): Interviewing Experts. Basinstoke: Palgrave.
• Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Einleitung. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp- 9–23.
• Bohnsack, R., Nohl, A.-M. (2013): Exemplarische Textinterpretation: Die Sequenzanalyse der dokumentarischen Methode. In: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (Eds.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 325–329.
• Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. In: Qualitative Research in psychology 3, 77–101.
• Brown, J., Isaacs, D. (2005): The World Cafe: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Burja, J. (2006): Lost in Translation? The Use of Interpreters in Fieldwork. In: Desai, V., Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 172–179
• Buttimer, A. (1999): Humanism and relevance in Geography. In: Scottish Geographical Journal 115, 103–116.
• Callens, K. (2002): Methodological Guide: Participatory Appraisal and Analysis of Nutrition and Household Food Security Situations and Interventions from a Livelihoods Perspective. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/y4094e/y4094e05.htm#fn13 (accessed last: 27 August 2020).
• Carey, M.A. (2015): Focus Groups. In: Smelser, N., Baltes, P. (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. Pp. 274–279.
• Chambers, R. (1994a): The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. In: World Development 22(7), 953–969.
• Chambers, R. (1994b): Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience. In: World Development 22(9), 1253–1268.
• Chametzky, B. (2016): Coding in Classic Grounded Theory: I’ve done an interview; Now what? In: Sociology Mind 6, 163–172.
• Chandra, Y., Shang, L. (2017): An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. In: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(1), pp. 90–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014 (last accessed: 17 July 2023).
• Clandinin, J. (2007) (Ed.): Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology. London: SAGE.
• Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical Considerations: Research with People in Situations of Forced Migration. In: Refuge 33/2, 11–17.
• Collier, M. (2001): Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In: Van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (Eds.): Handbook of visual analysis. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Pp. 35–60.
• Collier, J. JR. (2003): Photography and visual anthropology. In: Hockings, P. (Ed.): Principles of visual Anthropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 235–254.
• Collier, J. JR., Collier, M. (1986): Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
• Cubas, A. (2020): Migrants as Knowledge Producers: Participatory Photography as a (limited) tool for Inclusion. In: Migration Letters 17/2, 265–277.
• Curry, O., Smedley, C., Lenette, C. (2017): What Is “Successful” Resettlement? Refugee Narratives from Regional New South Wales in Australia. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 94(3), 1–19.
• Cyr, J. (2016): The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method. In: Sociological Methods & Research 45(2), 231–259.
• Dandy, J., Pe-Pua, R. (2015): The Refugee Experience of Social Cohesion in Australia: Exploring the Roles of Racism, Intercultural Contact, and the Media. In: Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13(4), 339–357.
• De Leeuw, E.D. (1992): Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publikaties.
• Deakin, H., Wakefield, K. (2014): Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. In: Qualitative Research 14(5), 603–616.
• Dey, I. (2005): Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, New York: Routledge.
• Dittrich-Brauner, K., Dittmann, E., List, V., Windisch, C. (2013): Interaktive Großgruppen. Change-Prozesse in Organisationen gestalten. Berlin: Springer.
• Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016): Evaluationsforschung. In: Döring, N., Bortz, J. (Eds.): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Pp. 975–1036.
• Donà, G. (2007): The Microphysics of Participation in Refugee Research. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2), 210–229.
• Driscoll, D.L. (2011). Introduction to primary research: Observations, surveys, and interviews. In: Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, 2, 153–174.
• Edwards, E. (1992): Introduction. In: Edwards, E. (Ed.): Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. New Haven: Yale University. Pp. 3–17.
• Elliott, S., Yusuf, I. (2014): ‘Yes, we can; but together’: Social capital and refugee resettlement. In: Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 9(2), 101–110.
• Emmel, N. (2008): Participatory Mapping: An innovative sociological method. Real Life Methods. NCRM: Southampton. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/soss/morgancentre/toolkits/2008-07-toolkit-participatory-map.pdf (accessed last, 21 August 2020).
• Farber, S., Mifsud, A., Allen, J., Widener, M., Newbold, K., Moniruzzaman, M. (2018): Transportation barriers to Syrian newcomer participation and settlement in Durham Region. In: Journal of Transport Geography 68, 181–192.
• Ferguson, O., Heinz, K. (2014): Participatory Methods and Tools for Extension. Social Map. Modernizing Extension and Advisory Services: Illinois. https://assets.echocommunity.org/secure/publication_issue/53f99bb6-f532-4606-8229-0327c16dbd3c/en/participatory-methods-and-tools-in-community-development.pdf (accessed last, 21⁠ ⁠August 2020).
• Fetterman, D. M. (1994): Empowerment evaluation. In: Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15.
• Fetterman, D. M. (2001): The transformation of evaluation into a collaboration: A vision of evaluation in the 21st century. In: The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 381–385.
• Finlay, L. (2002): “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. In: Qualitative Health Research 12(4), 531–545.
• Flick, U. (2009): Sozialforschung. Methoden und Anwendungen. Ein Überblick über für die BA-Studiengänge. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
• Fozdar F., Hartley L. (2014): Housing and the Creation of Home for Refugees in Western Australia. In: Housing, Theory and Society 31(2), 148–173.
• Freire, P. (1968): Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
• Freitag, M. (2009): Open Space. In: Kühl, S., Strodtholz, P., Taffertshofer, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung quantitative und qualitative Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 180–194.
• Gailing, L., Naumann, M. (2019): Effizient und partizipativ? Fokusgruppen am Beispiel der geographischen Energieforschung. In: Geographische Zeitschrift 107(2), 107–129.
• Gamper, M. (2020): Netzwerktheorie(n) – Ein Überblick. In: Klärner, A., Gamper, M., Keim-Klärner, S., Moor, I., von der Lippe, H., Vonneilich, N. (Eds..): Soziale Netzwerke und gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 49–64.
• Gangarova, E., von Unger, H. (2020): Community Mapping als Methode. Erfahrungen aus der partizipativen Zusammenarbeit mit Migrant*innen. In: Hartung, S., Wihofszky, P., Wright, M. (Eds.): Partizipative Forschung. Ein Forschungsansatz für Gesundheit und seine Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 143–177.
• Gifford, S.M., Bakopanos, C., Kaplan, I., Correa-Velez, I. (2007): Meaning or Measurement? Research the Social Contexts of Health and Settlement Among Newly-arrived Refugee Youth in Melbourne, Australia. In: Journal of Refugee Studies 20(3), 414–440.
• Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.
• Gold, R.L. (1958): Roles in sociological field observations. In: Social forces 36, 217–223.
• Gregory, D. (1998): Geographical imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell.
• Gruber, M. (2021): Kommunale Handlungsfelder im Bereich Integration. In: Stainer-Hämmerle, K., Oppitz, F. (Eds.): Handbuch Gemeindepolitik. Wien: Verlag Österreich. Pp. 413–447.
• Gruber, M. (2013): Integration im ländlichen Raum. Ein Praxishandbuch. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.
• Gruber, M., Lobnig, C., Scheiflinger, S., Stainer-Hämmerle, K. (2020): Stakeholder involvement plan. MATILDE Deliverable 2.8. Villach: Carinthia University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4005933.
• Gubrium, J., Holstein, J. (2002) (Eds.): Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Guest, G. (2015): Sampling and Selecting Participants in Field Research. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 215–249.
• Hagendorfer-Jauk, G., Gruber, M. (2022): Research on the GOOD LIFE. Citizens ask questions, collect needs, outline solutions. In: Proceedings of Science, PoS(ACSC2022)016. DOI:10.22323/1.407.0016.
• Harper, D. (2002): Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. In: Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
• Harris, J., Roberts, K. (2011): Challenging barriers to participation in qualitative research: involving disabled refugees. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees. Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 155–166.
• Hearne, R., Murphy, M. (2019): Participatory action research: a human rights and capabilities approach. Part 1: The Theory. Maynooth: Maynooth University.
• Hecker, J. and Sybing, R. (n.d.): What is Inductive Reasoning? Berlin: ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/inductive-analysis (accessed last, 17 July 2023).
• Hertz, R. (Ed.) (1997): Reflexivity & voice. Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE.
• Hollander, J.A. (2004): The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5), 602–637.
• Hübner, R. (2012): Interventionsbegriffe im Vergleich. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 155–172.
• Huisman, K. (2011): Why Maine? Secondary Migration Decisions of Somali Refugees. In: Ìrìnkèrindò: A Journal of African Migration 5, 55–98.
• Husseini de Araújo, S. (2011): Jenseits vom “Kampf der Kulturen”. Imaginative Geographien des Eigenen und des Anderen in arabischen Printmedien. Bielefeld: Transcript.
• Husserl, E. (1970): The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• International Association for Public Participation (2017): Code of ethics. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/2017_code_of_ethics-24x36_ia.pdf (accessed last, 23 August 2020).
• Iosifides, T. 2011: Qualitative methods in migration studies: a critical realist perspective. Farnham: Ashgate.
• Jagger, P., Duchelle, A., Dutt, S., Wyman, M. (2011): Preparing for the Field: Managing AND Enjoying Fieldwork. In: Angelsen, A., Larsen, H., Lund, J., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S. (Eds.): Measuring livelihhods: methods for research and fieldwork. London: Earthscan. Pp. 147–162.
• Jansen, D. (2006): Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse: Grundlagen, Methoden, Forschungsbeispiele. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Kabranian-Melkonian, S. (2015): Ethical Concerns With Refugee Research. In: Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 25 (7), 714–722.
• Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G. (2013): Focus Groups. From structured interviews to collective conversations. London: Routledge.
• Kearns, R.A. (2010): Seeing with clarity. Undertaking observational research. In: Hay, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Ontario: Oxford University Press. Pp. 241–258.
• Kiger, M.E., Varpio, L. (2020): Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
• Kissoon, P. (2011): Home/lessness as an indicator of integration: interviewing refugees about the meaning of home and accommodation. In: Temple, B., Moran, R. (Eds.): Doing research with refugees: Issues and guidelines. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press. Pp. 75–96.
• Knodel, J. (1993): Focus groups as a qualitative method for crosscultural research in social gerontology. In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10, 7–20.
• Kordel, S. (2015): Striving for the „good life“ – home-making among senior citizens on the move. An analysis of German (pre)retirees in Spain and Germany in a continuum of tourism and migration. Diss. Univ. Erlangen.
• Kordel, S. (2016): Transnational Mobility and ‚Insideness‘. Visual Methods in the Study of Home(s) in Retirement Migrants‘ Daily Lives. In: Walsh, K., L. Näre (Eds.): Transnational Migration and Home in Older Age. London: Routledge. Pp. 87–98.
• Kordel, S., Weidinger, T., Hachmeister, S. (2018): Lebenswelten geflüchteter Menschen in ländlichen Räumen qualitativ erforschen. Methodische Überlegungen zu einem partizipativ orientierten Forschungsansatz (= Thünen Working Paper 106). Braunschweig: Thünen-Institut.
• Krainer, L., Lerchster, R., Goldmann, H. (2012): Interventionsforschung in der Praxis. In: Krainer, L., Lerchster, R. E. (Eds.): Interventionsforschung. Paradigmen, Methoden, Reflexionen. Vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 175–243.
• Krueger, R.A. (1994): Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Kumar, S. (2002): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing.
• Kumar, S. (2007): Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. London: ITDG Publishing.
• Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.
• Lattanzi, M. (1998): Transdiscipliarity at UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114694 (accessed last, 29 May 2023).
• Legard, R., Keegan, J., Ward, K. (2003): In-depth Interviews. In: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (Eds.): Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE. Pp. 139–168.
• Legewie, H. (1991): Feldforschung und teilnehmende Beobachtung. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., Keupp, H., von Rosentstiel, L., Wolff., S. (Eds.): Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen. München: Beltz. Pp. 189–193.
• Lester, J.N., Cho, Y., Lochmiller, C.R. (2020): Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. 19 (1), pp. 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843209038.
• Littig, B., Wallace, C. (1997): Fokus-Gruppendiskussionen für die sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS).
• Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006): Focus Groups. In: Desai, V, Porter, R. (Eds.): Doing development research. London: SAGE. Pp. 153–162.
• Löhr, K., Weinhardt, M., Sieber, S. (2020): The “World Café“ as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19.
• Lüders, C. (2010): Beobachten im Feld und Ethnographie. In: Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., Steinke, I. (Eds.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt. Pp. 384–401.
• Lutz, M., Behnke, I., Zinnecker, J. (2003): Narrative Landkarten: Ein Verfahren zu Rekonstruktion aktueller und biographisch erinnerter Lebensräume. In: Friebertshäuser, B., Prengel, A. (Eds.): Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Weinheim/München: Beltz Juventa. Pp. 414–435.
• Manahl, C. (2023). Herausforderungen in der Regimeforschung auf Mikroebene mit partizipativen Zugängen begegnen? Eine Analyse anhand der Methode Social Mapping. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(2), Art. 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.3995.
• Marshall, M. (1996): Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13. Pp. 522–525.
• Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B. (1989): Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: SAGE.
• Mattissek, A., Pfaffenbach, C., Reuber, P. (2013): Methoden der empirischen Humangeographie: Beobachtung und Befragung. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und ausgewählte Verfahren. Braunschweig: Westermann.
• Mayring, P. (2014): Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
• McDowell, L. (2010): Interviewing. Fear and Liking in the field. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 156–171.
• McGregor, S. L. T. (2004): The Nature of Transdisciplinary Research and Practice. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238606943_The_Nature_of_Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Practice.
• Merriam, S., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M., Kee, Y, Ntseane, G., Muhamad, M. (2010): Power and Positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. In: International Journal of Life-long Education 20(5), 405–416.
• Mertens, D. M., McLaughlin, J. A. (2004): Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
• Miller, K. (2004): Beyond the Frontstage: Trust, Access and the Relational Context in Research with Refugee Communities. In: American Journal of Community Psychology 33(3/4), 217–227.
• Mitchell, J.C. (1969): Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relation-ships in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Misoch, S. (2015): Qualitative Interviews. Oldenburg: De Gruyter.
• Morgan, D.L. (1996): Focus Groups. In: Annual Review of Sociology 22, 129–152.
• Musante, K. (2015): Participant Observation. In: Bernard, H. R., Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 251–292.
• Nanz, P., Fritsche, M. (2012): Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
• Nehls, K., Smith, B., Schneider, H. (2015): Video-Conferencing Interviews in Qualitative Research. In: Hai-Jew, S. (Ed.): Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology. Hershey: IGI Global. Pp. 140–157.
• Neuburger, M., Schmitt, T. (2012): Theorie der Entwicklung – Entwicklung der Theorie. Post-Development und Postkoloniale Theorien als Herausforderung für eine Geographische Entwicklungsforschung. In: Geographica Helvetica 67, 121–124.
• Novick, G. (2008): Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? In: Research in Nursing & Health 31(4), 391–398.
• OECD (2022): Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/Frascati_Manual_2002_EN.pdf (accessed last, 29 May 2023).
• OECD (2020): Addressing Societal Challenges using transdisciplinary research. DSTI/STP/GSF(2020)4/FINAL. Policy Paper No. 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957.
• OECD (2021): Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en.
• Ostrower, F. (1998): Nonparticipant Observation as an Introduction to Qualitative Research. In: Teaching Sociology 26(1), 57–61.
• Owen, H. (1997): Open Space Technology. A User‘s Guide. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Owen, H. (2008): Open Space Technology. A User’s Guide. 3rd revised and expanded edition. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Owen, H., Stadler, A. (1999): Open Space Technology. In: Holman, P., Devane, T. (Eds.): The Change Handbook. Group Methods for Shaping the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Pp- 233–244.
• Parker, A., Tritter, J. (2006): Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. In: International Journal of Research & Method in Education 29(1), 23–37.
• Pelz, C., Schmitt, A., Meis, M. (2004): Knowledge Mapping als Methode zur Auswertung und Ergebnispräsentation von Fokusgruppen in der Markt- und Evaluationsforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 5(2), Art. 35. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-5.2.601.
• Penman, J., Goel, K. (2017): Coping and resilience of rural and regional Australian immigrants: imperatives for successful settlement. In: Rural Society 26(2), 178–193.
• Poppe, W. (2013): Patterns and Meanings of Housing: Residential Mobility and Homeownership among Former Refugees. In: Urban Geography 34(2), 218–241.
• Pratt, G. (2002): Studying Immigrants in Focus Groups. In: Moss, P. (Ed.): Feminist Geography in Practice. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell. Pp. 214–230.
• Pretty, J. N., Guijt, I., Scoones, I., Thompson, J. (1995): A Trainer’s Guide for Participatory Learning and Action. London: IEED.
• RatSWD (Rat für Sozial- und WirtschaftsDaten) (2017): Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Berlin: RatSWD. https://www.ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_Output9_Forschungsethik.pdf (accessed last, 03 September 2020).
• Reason, R. (1998): Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (Eds.): Strategies of Qualitative Research. London: Sage. Pp. 261–291.
• Regeer, B. (2002): Transdisciplinarity. http://www.bio.vu.nl/vakgroepen/bens/HTML/transdiscipliNl.html (accessed last, 19 May 2004).
• Rodgers, G. (2004): ‘Hanging out’ with forced migrants: methodological and ethical challenges. In: Forced Migration Review 21, 48–49.
• Rose, G. (2008): Using Photographs as Illustrations in Human Geography. In: Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151–160.
• Roth, W. M., von Unger, H. (2018) (Eds.): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. In: Forum Qualitative Social Science Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 19(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/62
• Ruddat, M. (2012): Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mittels Zusammenfassung zentraler Diskussionsaspekte. In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 195–206.
• Said, E. (1978): Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
• Schammann, H., Gluns, D. (2021): Migrationspolitik. Nomos: Baden Baden.
• Schammann, H., Gluns, D., Heimann, C., Müller, S., Wittchen, T., Younso, F., Ziegler, F. (2021): Defining and transforming local migration policies: a conceptual approach backed by evidence from Germany. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47:13, 2897–2915.
• Schetula, V., Gallego Carrera, D. (2012): Konfliktsituationen in Fokusgruppen: Eine Herausforderung für den Moderator. Strategien im Umgang mit Konfliktsituationen, dargestellt am Fallbeispiel des Projektes „Energie nachhaltig konsumieren – nachhaltig Energie konsumieren. Wärmeenergie im Spannungsfeld von sozialen Bestimmungsfaktoren, ökonomischen Bedingungen und ökologischem Bewusstsein.“ In: Schulz, M., Mack, B., Renn, O. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 90–110.
• Schöhnhut, M., Jerrentrup, M.T. (2019): Partizipation und nachhaltige Entwicklung. Ein Überblick. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Schulz, M. (2012): Quick and easy!? Fokusgruppen in der angewandten Sozialwissenschaften. In: Schulz, M. et al. (Eds.): Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 9–23.
• Schulz, M., Ruddat, M. (2012): „Let’s talk about sex!“ Über die Eignung von Telefoninterviews in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Research 13(3), Art. 2.
• Schweizer, T. (1996): Muster sozialer Ordnung. Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Reimer.
• Scott, J. (1988): Trend Report. Social Network Analysis. Sociology 22(1), 109–127.
• Sen, A. (2001): Development as Freedom. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Skop, E. (2006): The Methodological Potential of Focus Groups in Population Geography. In: Population, Space and Place 12, 113–124.
• Sontheimer, S., Callens, K., Seiffert, B. (1999): Conducting a PRA Training and Modifying PRA Tools to Your Needs. An Example from a Participatory Household Food Security and Nutrition Project in Ethiopia. Rome: FAO.
• Spittler, G. (2001): Teilnehmende Beobachtung als Dichte Teilnahme. In: Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 126, 1–25.
• Spradley, J.P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
• Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2014): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
• Straßburger, G., Rieger, J. (Eds.) (2019): Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. 2. Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
• Spencer, S. (2011): Visual research methods in the social sciences. Milton Park: Routledge.
• Stachowksi, J. (2020): Positioning in ‘relational claustrophobia’ – ethical reflections on researching small international migrant communities in rural areas. In: Journal of Rural Studies 78, 176–184.
• State University of New York at Fredonia (2023): Assessment – Definition and Overview. URL: https://www.fredonia.edu/about/offices/academic-affairs/assessment/assessment-information-resources (accessed last, 28 April 2023).
• Täubig, V. (2009): Totale Institution Asyl: Empirische Befunde zu alltäglichen Lebensführungen in der organisierten Desintegration. Weinheim, München: Beltz Juventa.
• Thierbach C., Petschick G. (2014) Beobachtung. In: Baur N., Blasius J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: Wiesbaden. Pp. 855–866.
• Tuckett, A. (2004): Qualitative research sampling-the very real complexities. Nurse Researcher 12(1), Pp. 47–61.
• United Nations (n.d.): International Day of Disabled Persons 2004. Nothing about Us, Without Us, URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/international-day-of-persons-with-disabilities-3-december/international-day-of-disabled-persons-2004-nothing-about-us-without-us.html (accessed last, 26 May 2023).
• Vaismoradi, M., Snelgrove, S. (2019): Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. In: Forum Qualitative Social Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 20(3), Art. 23.
• von Unger, H. (2014): Partizipative Forschung. Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• von Unger, H. (2021): Ethical reflexivity as research practice. In: Historical Social Research 46 (2), 186–204.
• Vogl, S. (2014): Gruppendiskussion. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Pp. 581–586.
• Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994): Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Watson, A., Till, K. (2010): Ethnography and participant observation. In: DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., McDowell, L. (Eds.): The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE. Pp. 121–137.
• Weidinger, T., Kordel, S., Kieslinger, J. (2019 (2021)): Unravelling the meaning of place and spatial mobility: analysing the everyday life-worlds of refugees in host societies by means of mobility mapping. In: Journal of Refugee Studies. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fez004.
• Weischer, C., Gehrau, V. (2017): Die Beobachtung als Methode in der Soziologie. Konstanz: UVK.
• Wenzel, F., Boeser-Schnebel, C. (2019): Dorfgespräch. Ein Beitrag zur Demokratieentwicklung im ländlichen Raum. Bonn: Stiftung Mitarbeit.
• Wernesjö, U. (2015): Landing in a rural village: home and belonging from the perspectives of unaccompanied young refugees. In: Identities 22(4), 451–467.
• White, H.C. (2008): Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Yin, R. K. (2003): Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, London, New Dehli: SAGE Publications.
• Želinský, D. (2019): From Deduction to Abduction: Constructing a Coding Frame for Communist Secret Police Documents. In: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3377 (accessed last, 17 July 2023).
• Ziersch, A., Walsh, M., Due, C., Duivesteyn, E. (2017): Exploring the Relationship between Housing and Health for Refugees and Asylum Seekers in South Australia: A Qualitative Study. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, 1036.