Nonlegal Sanctioning in Private Legal Systems
Limits in US Antitrust Law and EU Competition Law
Zusammenfassung
Einige moderne Handelsverbände im transnationalen Bereich verhängen nicht-rechtliche Sanktionen gegen illoyale Branchenakteure, wenn diese sich nicht an Schiedssprüche halten. Diese Maßnahmen untergraben zwar die Rechtsordnungen der Staaten, dennoch könnten sie als praktikable Alternative zu langwierigen und teuren Gerichtsprozessen angesehen werden.
Das Werk enthält Best-Practice-Leitlinien, die aufzeigen, unter welchen Bedingungen solche Sanktionen, die von einem Wirtschaftsverband verhängt werden, nicht gegen das US-Kartellrecht und das europäische Wettbewerbsrecht verstoßen.
Abstract
Some modern-day trade associations in commodities industries have complex systems of private commercial enforcement. These associations impose nonlegal sanctions on disloyal industry actors for not complying with awards stemming from specialized commercial arbitration after a business conflict. These extrajudicial measures undermine states’ rights to enact formal legal rules, and could violate US Antitrust Law and EU Competition Law. Yet, they could be viewed as a viable alternative to lengthy and expensive court litigation. This book provides best practice guidelines to highlight under what conditions nonlegal sanctions imposed by a trade association and executed by its members do not violate US Antitrust Law and EU Competition Law.
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenSeiten
- 25–34 Introduction 25–34
- 475–518 Bibliography 475–518
- Adanacioglu, H, “The Futures Market in Agricultural Products and an Evaluation of the Attitude of Farmers: A Case Study of Cotton Producers in Aydin Province in Turkey”, New Medit, No. 2 2011, 58.
- Adkinson, Jr., WF, Grimm, KL, and Bryan, CN, “Enforcement of Section 2 of the Sherman Act: Theory and Practice”, FTC Working Paper 2008, p. 3-4.
- Akman, P, ““Consumer” versus “Customer”: the Devil in the Detail”, ESRC Centre for Competition Policy Working Paper No. 08-34 2008, p. 8.
- Areeda, P, “Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles”, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 58, No. 3 1989, p. 853.
- Armstrong, Jr., NA, Carroll, JD, and Yook, CC, “Sherman Act Section 1 Fundamentals”, LexisNexis 2019, p. 3.
- Association of Legal Administrators, “Antitrust Guide: For Members of the Association of Legal Administrators”, Association of Legal Administrators 2019, p. 1.
- Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, “Report of the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws”, Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws 1955, p. 1, 3.
- Aviram, A, “The Paradox of Spontaneous Formation of Private Legal Systems”, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 192 2003, p. 1-72.
- Barber, CF, “Refusals to Deal under the Federal Antitrust Laws”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 103, No. 7 1955, p. 847.
- Behrens, P, “The ordoliberal concept of "abuse" of a dominant position and its impact on Article 102 TFEU”, Econstor 2015, p. 5, 20.
- Bernstein, L, “Opting out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry”, The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1 1992, p. 115, 124, 126.
- Bernstein, L, “Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms, and Institutions”, Michigan Law Review 2001, p. 7.
- Bird, CC, “Sherman Act Limitations on Noncommercial Concerted Refusals to Deal”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1970, No. 2 1970, p. 253-254.
- Blair, RD, and Sokol, DD, “The Rule of Reason and the Goals of Antitrust: An Economic Approach”, UF Law Scholarship Repository 2012, p. 476, 480.
- Bork, RH, “Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act”, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 9 1966.
- Bossone, B, “The Role of Trust in Financial Sector Development”, Policy Research Working Paper 2200 1999, p. 18.
- Brodley, JF, “Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures: An Overview”, American Bar Association, Vol. 66, No. 3, 1998, p. 1526.
- Bruce, AB, “Bailliére's Encyclopædia of Scientific Agriculture”, Bailliér, Tindall and Cox 1931, p. 520.
- Calliess, G, and Zumbransen, P, “Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2010, p. 2110.
- Calliess, G, “Lex Mercatoria”, Zentra Working Papers in Transnational Studies No. 52 / 201 2015, p. 1-15.
- Calliess, G, “Lex mercatoria”, Encyclopedia of Private International Law 2017, p. 1119-1129.
- Chaplan, B, “The Economics of Non-State Legal Systems”, Libertarian Alliance 1997, p. 2, 13.
- Charny, D, “Nonlegal Sanctions in Commercial Relationships”, Harvard Law Review 1993, p. 392-393.
- Cheung, CMK, and Lee, MKO, “Online Consumer Reviews: Does Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Hurt More?”, Association for Information Systems 2008, p. 2.
- Colomo, PI, “The Law on Abuses of Dominance and the System of Judicial Remedies”, Yearbook of European Law, Vol. 32, No. 1 2013, p. 389.
- Cucu, C, “Agreements, Decisions and Concerted Practices: Key Concepts in the Analysis of Anti-competitive Agreements”, Lex ET Scientia International Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 1 2013 p. 222.
- Dammann, J, and Hansmann, H, “Globalizing Commercial Litigation”, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 1 2008, p. 1.
- Drahozal, CR, “Private Ordering and International Commercial Arbitration”, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 113:4 2009, p. 1032.
- European Commission, “DG Competition discussion paper on the application of Article 82 of the Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU] to exclusionary abuses”, European Commission 2005, para. 29, 31, 80, 84.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization in collaboration with the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands), “Development of Criteria for Acceptable Previous Cargoes for Fats and Oils”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization in collaboration with the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands) 2007, p. 20.
- Geradin, D, and Petit, N, “Price Discrimination under EC Law: The Need for a Case-by-Case Approach”, Coleurope 2005, p. 15.
- Gerard, D, “Effects-based enforcement of Article 101 TFEU: the “object paradox””, Kluwer Competition Law Blog 2012, p. 1.
- Goldman, B, “Frontières du Droit et Lex Mercatoria”, Arch. De Philosophie Du Droit 1964, p. 177-192.
- Gomtsian, S, Balvert, A, Hock, B, and Kirman, O, “Between the Green Pitch and the Red Tape: The Private Legal Order of FIFA”, TILEC Discussion Paper 2017, p. 8, 12.
- Haddock, GB, “The Right of Trade Associations to Deny Membership and to Expel Members”, Antitrust Bulletin Vol. 13 1968, p. 555-556.
- Harwell, JL, “The Relevant Market Concept in Conspiracy to Monopolize Cases under Section 2 of the Sherman Act”, The University of Chicago Law Review 1977, p. 808-812.
- Hatzopoulos, V, “The EU essential facilities doctrine”, College of Europe 2006, p. 19-20.
- Hennig-Thurau, T, Gwinner, KP, Walsh, G, and Gremler, DD, “Electronic Word-of-mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet”, Wiley Periodicals 2004, p. 39.
- Heyer, K, “Consumer Welfare and the Legacy of Robert Bork”, The University of Chicago Press 2014, p. 20.
- Hibner, Jr., DT, “Litigation as an Overt Act in Furtherance of an Attempt to Monopolize”, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 38, Nr. 2 1977, p. 246.
- Hovenkamp, HJ, “The Rule of Reason”, Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository 2018, p. 96.
- ICN Advocacy Working Group, “Explaining the Benefits of Competition to the General Public”, International Competition Network 2017, p. 3.
- Jones, TT, and Pickering, JF, “The Consumer’s Interest in Competition Policy”, Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics 1979, p. 98.
- Jones, A, “The Boundaries of an Undertaking in EU Competition Law”, European Competition Journal 2015, p. 302.
- Kahn, AE, “Market Power and Economic Growth: Guides to Public Policy”, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 8 1963.
- Katz, ED, “Private Order and Public Institutions”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 8 2000, p. 2482.
- Kauper, TE, “The Report of the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws: A Retrospective”, Michigan Law Review Vol. 100, No. 7 2002, p. 1867.
- Kirchner, C, and Picot, A, “Transaction Cost Analysis of Structural Changes in the Distribution System: Reflections on Institutional Developments in the Federal Republic of Germany”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 143 1987, p. 64.
- Kube, S, and Traxler, C, “The interaction of legal and social norm enforcement”, Journal of Public Economic Theory 2010, p. 1.
- Lao, M, “Search, Essential Facilities, and the Antitrust Duty to Deal”, Northwest Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, Is. 5 2013, p. 298-304.
- Lévesque, G-H, “The Concrete Characteristics of Laissez-Faire Capitalism”, Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1950, p. 41-42.
- Lörcher, T, Pendell, G, and Lowery, W, “CMS Guide to Arbitration, Vol. 1”, CMS Legal Services EEIG 2012, p. 521.
- Lowe, P, “The design of competition policy institutions for the 21st century — the experience of the European Commission and DG Competition”, Competition Policy Newsletter No. 3 2008, p. 6.
- Mark, W, and Weidemaier, C, “Toward a Theory of Precedent in Arbitration”, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 51, Is. 5 2010, p. 1901.
- Mazzacano, P, “The Lex Mercatoria as Autonomous Law”, Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Research Paper No. 29 2008, p. 1.
- McMillan, J, and Woodruf, C, “Private Order under Dysfunctional Public Order”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 8 2000, p. 2421.
- Michaels, R, “The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14 2007, p. 448.
- Möschel, W, “Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View”, German Neo-Liberals and the Social Market Economy 1989, p. 146.
- Newman, JM, “Procompetitive Justifications in Antitrust Law”, Social Science Research Network 2017, p. 7.
- Nicolaides, P, “The balancing myth: The Economics of Article 81(1) & (3)”, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 2005, p. 134-143.
- Nunnenkamp, P, “Short Note: Biased Arbitrators and Tribunal Decisions Against Developing Countries: Stylized Facts on Investor-state Dispute Settlement”, Journal of International Development 2017, p. 851.
- Oliar, D, “There’s No Free Laugh (anymore): The Emergence of Intellectual Property Norms and the Transformation of Stand-up Comedy”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 8 2008, p. 1789, 1791.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “The Essential Facilities Concept”, OCDE/GD(96)113 1996, p. 97.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Latin American Competition Forum”, DAF/COMP/LACF 2011, p. 21.
- Ottervanger, T, “Socially Responsible Competition: Competition law in a changing society”, Markt & Mededinging 2010, p. 9.
- Peyt, H, and Nørager, N, “Current Developments in Member States”, European Competition Journal 4 2008, p. 332.
- Polovets, I, Smith, M, and Terry, B, “GAFTA Arbitration as the Most Appropriate Forum for Disputes Resolution in Grain Trade”, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law Vol. 30, No. 3 2013, p. 571-572, 580.
- Ponsoldt, JF, “The Application of the Sherman Act Antiboycott law to Industry Self-Regulation: An Analysis Integrating Nonboycott Sherman Act Principles”, Bepress 1981, p. 13.
- Post, RC, “The Social Foundations of Defamation Law: Reputation and the Constitution”, California Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 691 1986, p. 692.
- Pritchard, JR, “Oilseed quality requirements for processing”, Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 1983, p. 322.
- Prüfer, J, “Business Associations and Private Ordering”, TILEC Discussion Paper 2012, p. 4.
- Richman, BD, “Community Enforcement of Informal Contracts: Jewish Diamond Merchants in New York”, The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper, No. 384 2002, p. 0 (abstract), 17, 102.
- Richman, BD, “How Community Institutions Create Economic Advantage: Jewish Diamond Merchants in New York”, Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 31, Is. 2 2006, p. 18, 395, 398.
- Richman, BD, “The Antitrust of Reputation Mechanisms: Institutional Economics and Concerted Refusals to Deal”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95:325 2009, p. 332-334, 340, 349.
- Richman, BD, “An Autopsy of Cooperation: Diamond Dealers and the Limits of Trust-based Exchange”, Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 2 2017, p. 279.
- Routledge, “Code-Sharing Agreements in Scheduled Passenger Air Transport–The European Competition Authorities' Perspective”, European Competition Journal 2006, p. 279.
- Salop, SC, “Exclusionary Conduct, Effect on Consumers, and the Flawed Profit-Sacrifice Standard”, 73 Antitrust L. J. 2006, p. 330.
- Saputelli, G, “The European Union, the Member States, and the Lex Mercatoria”, Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 8, Is. 2, Article 3 2018, p. 3.
- SBD, “De Belgische Diamentnijverheid”, Algemene vergadering van SBD 2014, p. 7.
- Sherwin, P, Roesser, JD, Miller, PL, and Loughery, V, “Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration: Managing, Resolving, and Avoiding Cross-Border Business or Regulatory Disputes”, Proskauer Rose LLP 2007, chapter 21.
- Slaughter and May, “An overview of the EU competition rules – A general overview of the European Competition rules applicable to cartels, abuse of dominance, forms of commercial cooperation, merger control and State aid”, Slaughter and May 2016, p. 8, 14.
- Stucke, ME, “Does the Rule of Reason Violate the Rule of Law?”, U.C. Davis Law Review, Vol. 42 2009, p. 1422.
- Sussman, E, and Wilkinson, J, “Benefits Of Arbitration for Commercial Disputes”, Dispute Resolution Magazine 2012.
- The Yale Law Journal Company, “Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy under the Sherman Act”, The Yale Law Journal Company, Vol. 63, No. 3 1954, p. 372.
- TradeAssociationForum, “The Benefits of Trade Associations”, TradeAssociationForum 2009, p. 2, 4.
- Trenz, M, and Berger, B, “Analyzing Online Customer Reviews – An Interdisciplinary Literature Review and Research Agenda”, ECIS 2013, p. 2.
- U.S. Department of Justice, “Competition and Monopoly: Single-firm Conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act”, U.S. Department of Justice 2008, p. 5, 34, 39.
- van Cleynenbreugel, P, “Single Entity Tests in US Antitrust and EU Competition Law”, Orbi 2011, p. 6.
- van Erp, J, “Reputational Sanctions in Private and Public Regulation”, Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 1, Is. 5 2009, p. 146.
- Velkar, A, ”‘Deep’ integration of 19th century grain markets: coordination and standardisation in a global value chain”, London School of Economics 2010, p. 24.
- Waller, SP, “Areeda, Epithets, and Essential Facilities”, Wisconsin Law Review 2008, p. 368.
- Warlouzet, L, “The Centralization of EU Competition Policy: Historical Institutionalist Dynamics from Cartel Monitoring to Merger Control (1956–91)”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 54, No. 3 2016, p. 731.
- Weitbrecht, A, “From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond—the First 50 Years of European Competition Law”, European Competition Law Review 2008, p. 85.
- Williams, KD, “Ostracism”, Annual Review of Psychology 2007, p. 428.
- Willis Towers Wadson, “Preserving Your Reputation”, Willis Alert, Issue 17 2011, p. 3.
- Woods, D, “Hybrid Single Entities and the Market Power Requirement for Conspiracies to Monopolize Following Fraser: Are Courts Putting Form over Substance?”, University of Illinois Law Review 2004, p. 1262.
- Zirhlioglu, E, “The Diamond Industry and the Industry’s Dispute Resolution Mechanisms”, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 2013, p. 4.
- Zito Jr., AS, “Refusals to Deal: The Sherman Antitrust Act and the Right to Customer Selection”, The John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 14, Is. 2 1981, p. 357.
- Ackermann, T, “Art. 85 Abs. 1 EGV und die rule of reason - Zur Konzeption der Verhinderung, Einschränkung oder Verfälschung des Wettbewerbs”, Cologne/Berlin/Bonn/Munich: Heymanns 1997, p. 21 ff, 211 ff.
- Akman, P, “The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law: Law and Economic Approaches”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2012, [abstract], p. 59, 63, 127.
- Al-Ameen, A, “Antitrust: The Person-centred Approach”, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer International Publishing, Switzerland 2014, p. 73.
- Albors-Llorens, A, “EC Competition Law and Policy”, Abingdon: Routledge 2002, p. 152.
- Alford, S, Barrow, J, and Nigel Hall, SJD, “Northern History”, in: N Hall (ed), “The governance of the Liverpool raw cotton market, c. 1840-1914”, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, Vol. 153, Is. 1, 2016, p. 98.
- Allensworth, RH, “The Commensurability Myth in Antitrust”, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 1 2016, p. 5 (citation 7).
- American Bar Association, “Jury Instructions in Criminal Antitrust Cases, 1976-1980: A Compilation of Instructions Given by United States District Courts”, Chicago: American Bar Association 1982, p. 311.
- American Bar Association, “Antitrust & Trade Associations: How Trade Regulation Laws Apply to Trade and Professional Associations”, Chicago: American Bar Association 1996, p. 62.
- American Bar Association, “Model Jury Instructions in Civil Antitrust Cases”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2005, p. C-35.
- American Bar Association, “Joint Ventures: Antitrust Analysis of Collaborations Among Competitors”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2006, p. 102.
- American Bar Association, “Antitrust and Associations Handbook”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2009, p. 64, 68-69.
- American Bar Association, “Model Jury Instructions in Criminal Antitrust Cases”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2009, p. 71-75.
- American Bar Association, “Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2010, p. 50-51.
- American Bar Association, “Federal Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2010, p. 71.
- American Bar Association, “Proof of Conspiracy under Federal Antitrust Laws”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2010, p. 24.
- Andenas, M, Marsden, P, and Hutchings, M, “Current Competition Law Volume II”, London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2004, p. 359.
- Anderman, SD, “The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 40.
- Ando, C, and Rüpke, J, “Public and Private in Ancient Mediterranean Law and Religion”, Berlin/Munich/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2015, p. 37-41.
- Andrews, N, “Arbitration and Contract Law”, Basel: Springer International Publishing 2016, p. 130, 140.
- Ankersmit, L, “Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EU: Process-based Measures within the EU Legal Order”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017, p. 208.
- Anonymous, “How to Deal with Negative Electronic Word-Of-Mouth?”, Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag 2011, p. 4.
- Antwerp World Diamond Centre, “Antwerp Diamond Masterplan – Diamonds love Antwerp 2020”, Antwerp World Diamond Centre 2012, p. 5, 69, 148, 154.
- Applewhite, TH, “Proceedings of the World Conference on Lauric Oils: Sources, Processing, and Application”, Champaign: AOCS Press 1994, p. 29.
- Areeda, PE, and Hovenkamp, H, “Antitrust Law –Vol. 3”, New York: Aspen Publishers 2008, p. 446.
- Aspen Publishers, “Antitrust: Keyed to Pitofsky, Goldschmid, and Wood's Trade Regulation: Cases and Materials Fifth Edition”, New York: Aspen Publishers 2004, p. 71.
- Aspen Publishers, “Antitrust”, New York: Aspen Publishers 2004, p. 38.
- Atkin, M, “The International Grain Trade”, Abington: Woodhead Publishing 1995, p. 111, 113.
- Atkinson, B, and John, S, “Studying Economics”, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2001, p. 9.
- Baffes, J, Larson, DF, and Varangis, P, “Commodity Market Reforms: Lessons of Two Decades”, Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction 2001, p. 38.
- Baker, HD, and Jursa, M, “Documentary Sources in Ancient Near Eastern and Greco-Roman Economic History”, Oxford/Philadelphia: Oxbow Books 2014, p. 147.
- Baldwin, AR, “World Conference on Emerging Technologies in the Fats and Oils Industry”, in: E.C. Campbell (ed.), “Trade Association Rules - Impact on International Trade”, Urbana: American Oil Chemists’ Society 1986, p. 24.
- Banks, E, “Exchange-Traded Derivatives”, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 2003, p. 105-106.
- Barak, A, “The Judge in a Democracy”, Princeton/Woodstock: Princeton University Press 2006, p. 113.
- Barnard, C, and Peers, S, “European Union Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017, p. 521.
- Barton, J, and Smith, RH, “The Handbook for the New Legal Writer”, New York: Wolters Kluwer 2019, p. 345.
- Basedow, J, and Wurmnest, W, “Structure and Effects in EU Competition Law: Studies on Exclusionary Conduct and State Aid”, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011, p. 15, 71.
- Bavasso, A, “Communications in EU Law: Antitrust Market Power and Public Interest”, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2003, p. 164.
- Beckert, S, “Empire of Cotton: A Global History”, New York: Vintage Books 2014, p. 40.
- Beckett, ST, “Industrial Chocolate Manufacture and Use – Fourth Edition”, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing 2009, p. 25.
- Beckett, ST, Fowler, MS, and Ziegler, GR, “Beckett's Industrial Chocolate Manufacture and Use – Fifth Edition”, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell 2017, p. 28.
- Beggs-Humphreys, M, Gregor, H, and Humphreys, D, “The Industrial Revolution”, Abingdon: Routledge 1959, p. 27.
- Berman, HJ, “Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition”, Cambridge/London: Cambridge University Press 1983, p. 519.
- Berman, PS, “Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence Of Law Beyond Borders”, New York: Cambridge University Press 2012, p. 13.
- Bernholz, P, and Vaubel, R, “Explaining Monetary and Financial Innovation: A Historical Analysis”, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer International Publishing 2014, p. 267.
- Berry, E, Homewood, M, J, Bogusz, B, “Complete EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017, p. 596, 610.
- Bhatia, V, K, Garzone, G, and Degano, C, “Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations”, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2012, p. 177.
- Binmore, K, “Game Theory and the Social Contract: Playing Fair”, Cambridge/London: The MIT Press 1994, p. 112.
- Bittman, JB, “Trading and Hedging with Agricultural Futures and Options”, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons 2013, p. 2.
- Blair, RD, and Sokol, DD, “The Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics – Vol. 2”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 156.
- Blanco, LO, “Shipping Conferences under EC Antitrust Law: Criticism of a Legal Paradox”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2007, p. 375.
- Blanco, LO, “Market Power in EU Antitrust Law”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2011, p. 22, 56, 104, 106-107
- Block, MJ, “The Benefits of Alternate Dispute Resolution for International Commercial and Intellectual Property Disputes”, The Digital Journal of Rutgers School of Law, Vol. 44 2016, p. 7-8.
- Bogart, JH, “Circuit Conflicts in Antitrust Litigation”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2009, p. 34.
- Boisson de Chazournes, L, Kohen, M, and Viñuales, JE, “Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement”, Leiden/Boston: Koninklijke Brill NV 2013, p. 273.
- Bouckaert, B, and de Geest, G, “Encyclopedia of Law and Economics”, in: S. G. Medema (ed), RO Zerbe, “The Coase Theorem”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2000, p. 837-838, in: S. Panther (ed), “Non-Legal Sanctions”, Aldershot: Edward Elgar 2000, p. 1000.
- Bourgeois, J, and Waelbroeck, D, “Ten years of effects-based approach in EU competition law - State of play and perspectives”, in: A Meij, and T Baum, “Balancing Object and Effect Analysis in Identifying Abuses of a Dominant Position under Article 102 TFEU”, Brussels: Groupe de Boeck 2013, p. 162, 164, in: H Zenger, and M Walker (ed) “Theories of Harm in European Competition Law: A Progress Report”, Brussels: Groupe de Boeck 2013, p. 195.
- Branch, AE, “International Purchasing and Management”, London: Thomson 2000, p. 63.
- Brunet, E, Brunet, E,J, Speidel, RE, Sternlight, JE, Ware, SH, and Ware, SJ, “Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment”, New York: Cambridge University Press 2006, p. 124.
- Bussani, M, and Sebok, AJ, “Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2015, p. 18.
- Cafaggi, F, “Enforcement of Transnational Regulation: Ensuring Compliance in a Global World”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2012, p. 218.
- Cahill, D, Power, V, and Connery, N, “European Law”, New York: Oxford University Press 2011, p. 164.
- Camerer, CF, “Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction”, Princeton/Woodstock: Princeton University Press 2003, p. 445.
- Cartledge, P, Millett, P, and von Reden, S, “Kosmos: Essays in Order, Conflict and Community in Classical Athens”, Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press 1998, p. 1.
- Carter, JH, and Fellas, J, “International Commercial Arbitration in New York”, New York: Oxford University Press 2010, p. 16.
- Candlin, CN, “Discourse and Practice in International Commercial Arbitration: Issues, Challenges, and Prospects”, London/New York: Routledge 2016, p. 265.
- Castleman, M, “The New Healing Herbs: The Classic Guide to Nature's Best Medicines”, Emmaus: Rodale 2001, p. 140.
- Chander, K, “Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Commerce: Volume 3”, New Delhi: Sarup & Sons 1999, p. 780.
- Chatnani, NN, “Commodity Markets: Operations, Instruments, and Applications”, New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill 2010, p. 4.
- Chen, K, and Fadlalla, A, “Online Consumer Protection: Theories of Human Relativism: Theories of Human Relativism”, New York: IGI Global 2009, p. 278.
- Chew, DH, “Corporate Risk Management”, New York: Columbia University Press 2008, p. 28.
- Cirace, J, “Law, Economics, and Game Theory”, London: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 2018, p. 113-119, 238.
- Clarke, J, “Managing Better: Becoming a Limited Company”, Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency 1996, p. 2, 371.
- Colino, SM, “Cartels and Anti-Competitive Agreements, Volume 1”, in: C Callery (ed), “Should the European Union Embrace or Exorcise Leegin’s “Rule of Reason”?”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2012, p. 101.
- Colino, SM, “Competition Law of the EU and UK”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019, p. 393.
- Crooks, E, “The Unrelenting Machine: A Legacy of the Industrial Revolution”, Morrisville: Lulu 2012, p. 65.
- Cross, FB, and Miller, RL, “The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases – Tenth Edition”, Boston: Cengage Learning 2018, p. 571.
- Cruz, JB, “Between Competition and Free Movement”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2002, p. 89.
- Currie, W, “Value Creation from E-Business Models”, in: N Madeja, and D Schoder, “Value creation from Corporate websites: how different features contribute to success in e-Business”, Oxford: Elsevier 2004, p. 216.
- Czaprack, K, “Intellectual Property and the Limits of Antitrust: A Comparative Study of US and EU Approaches”, Chelthenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2009, p. 32.
- Dabbah, MM, “EC and UK Competition Law: Commentary, Cases and Materials”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004, p. 69, 105, 330, 351.
- Dabbah, MM, “International and Comparative Competition Law”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010, p. 71.
- Dabbah, MM, “Module B: Abuse of a dominant position”, London: University of London Press 2012, p. 33
- Dand, R, “The International Cocoa Trade”, New York: Woodhead Publishing 1996, p. 82-83.
- Dand, R, “The International Cocoa Trade”, Cambridge/Philadelphia/New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing 2011, p. 97-98.
- Davies, K, “Understanding European Union Law”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2016, p. 54.
- Diebold, NF, “Non-Discrimination in International Trade in Services: ‘Likeness' in WTO/GATS”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010, p. 277.
- Dietz, T, “Global Order Beyond Law: How Information and Communication Technologies Facilitate Relational Contracting in International Trade”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2016, p. 192.
- DiMatteo, LA, “International Business Law and the Legal Environment: A Transactional Approach”, Abingdon: Routledge 2016, p. 251.
- DiMatteo, LA, “International Business Law and the Legal Environment: A Transactional Approach”, New York/London: Routledge 2017, p. 127.
- Dixit, AK, “Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance”, Princeton: Princeton University 2004, p. 4, 60-61.
- Dolmans, M, “The Dominance and Monopolies Review”, London: Law Business Research Ltd 2014, p. 368, 373.
- Dominicé, C, “Etudes de droit international en l'honneur de Pierre Lalive”, in: B Goldman (ed), “Nouvelles Riflexions sur la Lex Mercatoria”, Basel/Frankfurt am Main: Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag 1993, p. 241-256.
- Drexl, J, Grimes, WS, and Jones, CA, “More Common Ground for International Competition Law?”, Chelthenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011, p. 52.
- Drexl, J, Kerber, W, and Podszun, R, “Competition Policy and the Economic Approach: Foundations and Limitations”, in: D Zimmer (ed), “Consumer welfare, economic freedom and the moral quality of competition law – comments on Gregory Werden and Victor Vanberg”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011, p. 72.
- Drexl, J, and Di Porto, F, “Competition Law as Regulation”, Chelthenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2015, p. 296.
- Dubowski, T, “Białystok Law Books 2 Constitutional Law Of The European Union”, Bialystok: Temida 2 2011, p. 116-120.
- Duncan, R, “Agricultural Futures and Options: A Guide to Using North American and European markets”, Abington: Woodhead Publishing 1992, p. 53-54, 109.
- Dunne, N, “Competition Law and Economic Regulation: Making and Managing Markets”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, p. 177.
- Duns, J, Duke, A, and Sweeney, B, “Comparative Competition Law”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2015, p. 172.
- Duval, A, and van Rompuy, B, “The Legacy of Bosman: Revisiting the Relationship Between EU Law and Sport”, in: K Pijetlovic (ed.), “EU Competition Law and Organisational Rules”, T.M.C. Asser Press 2016, p. 148.
- Ehlermann, C, and Gosling, L, “European Competition Law Annual 1998: Regulating Communications Markets”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2000, p. 476.
- Ehlermann, C, and Atanasiu, I, “European Competition Law Annual 2000: The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2000, p. 141.
- Ehlermann, C, and Atanasiu, I, “European Competition Law Annual 2002: Constructing the EU Network of Competition Authorities”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2004, p. 261.
- Ehlermann, C, and Atanasiu, I, “European Competition Law Annual 2004: The Relationship Between Competition Law and the (Liberal) Professions”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2006, p. 454.
- Ehlermann, C, and Marquis, M, “European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2008, p. xxv.
- Elcin, M, “Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration Theory and Practice”, Vol. 1, Florence: Mert Elcin 2012, p. 5.
- Ellison, T, “The Cotton Trade of Great Britain: including a history of the Liverpool cotton market and of the Liverpool Cotton Brokers' Association”, London: Effingham Wilson 1886, p. 181–182, 184.
- Enaux, C, “Effiziente Marktregulierung in der Telekommunikation: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Ruckführung sektorspezifischer Sonderregulierung in das allgemeine Wettbewerbsrecht”, Münster: Lit Verlag 2004, p. 148, 156.
- Epstein, RA, “Contract - Freedom and Restraint: Liberty, Property, and the Law”, New York/Abingdon: Routledge 2000, p. 393, 363-364, 369.
- Erickson, DR, “Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization”, Urbana: AOCS Press 1995, p. 50.
- Ezraichi, A, “Article 82 EC: Reflections on its Recent Evolution”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2009, p. 124.
- Ezrachi, A, “EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2014, p. 33.
- Fatur, A, “EU Competition Law and the Information and Communication Technology Network Industries”, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2012, p. 112
- Ferretti, F, “EU Competition Law, the Consumer Interest and Data Protection: The Exchange Consumer Information in the Retail Financial Sector”, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer 2014, p. 47.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, “Proceedings of the FAO Rice Conference 2004: Rice in Global Markets”, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2005, p. 56.
- Foster, N, “Blackstone's EU Treaties and Legislation 2014-2015”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014, p. 609.
- Foster, N, “Foster on EU Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 381.
- Frederick, DA, “Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: The Story of the Capper-Volstead Act”, Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture 2002, p. 84.
- Frenz, W, “Handbook of EU Competition Law”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016, p. 270.
- Frohloff, J, “Verletzung von Schiedsvereinbarungen: Eine Untersuchung des deutschen Schiedsverfahrensrechts zu den Pflichten der Schiedsparteien und den Rechtsfolgen ihrer Verletzung”, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2017, p. 50
- Gabel, D, and Weiman, DF, “Opening Networks to Competition: The Regulation and Pricing of Access”, New York: Springer Science+Business Media 1998, p. 190.
- Galgano, F, “Lex mercatoria: storia del diritto commerciale”, Munich: Il Mulino 1993.
- Geradin, D, Layne-Farrar, A, and Petit, N, “EU Competition Law and Economics”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012, p. 1-134.
- Gerber, DJ, “Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998, p. 264.
- Gert, B, “Morality: Its Nature and Justification”, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998, p. 120.
- Gessner, V, “Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges”, in: W Konradi (ed), “The Role of Lex Mercatoria in Supporting Globalised Transactions”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2009, p. 67, 70.
- Gharavi, H, and Liebscher, C, “The International Effectiveness of the Annulment of an Arbitral Award”, The Hague: Kluwer law International 2002, p. 34.
- Gideon, A, “Higher Education Institutions in the EU: Between Competition and Public Service”, Liverpool/Singapore: T.M.C. Asser Press 2017, p. 74, 75 (note 159).
- Givens, RA, “Antitrust: An Economic Approach”, New York: Law Journal Press 2005, p. 4-48.28.
- Comanor, GW, Jacquemin, K, and Jenny, A, “Competition Policy in Europe and North America”, New York: Hardwood Academic Publishers GmbH 1990, p. 231.
- Gorham, M, and Singh, N, “Electronic Exchanges: The Global Transformation from Pits to Bits”, London: Elsevier 2009, p. 4.
- Gormsen, LL, “A Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominance in European Competition Law”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010, p. 56-57.
- Goss, BA, “Futures Markets (Routledge Revivals): Their Establishment and Performance”, in: BA Goss (ed.), “The Forward Pricing Function of the London Metal Exchange”, London/Sydney: Croom Helm 1986, p. 157.
- Goyder, DG, “EC Competition Law, 3rd Edition”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998, p. 145.
- Graham, C, Smith, F, and Smith, FM, “Competition, Regulation and the New Economy”, in: E Derclaye (ed), “Abuse of a Dominant Position and IP Rights”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2004, p. 74.
- Great Britain. Dept. of Trade and Industry, “Abuse of Market Power: A Consultative Document on Possible Legislative Option”, Richmond: H.M. Stationery Office 1992, p. 7.
- Grivetti, LE, and Shapiro, H, “Chocolate: History, Culture, and Heritage”, in: JH Momsen and P Richardson (ed), “Caribbean Cocoa: Planting and Production”, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons 2009, p. 481.
- Hagenfeld, V, “EC Competition Law - the Essential Facilities Doctrine: To what extent is the Essential Facilities Doctrine established in Community law and how has its application under Article 82 EC evolved over time”, Munich: GRIN Verlag GmbH 2009, p. 3-4.
- Hall, KL, “Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, Second Edition”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005, p. 145.
- Haracoglou, I, “Competition Law and Patents: A Follow-on Innovation Perspective in the Biopharmaceutical Industry”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2008, p. 135.
- Harris, B, Planterose, R, and Tecks, J, “The Arbitration Act 1996: A Commentary”, Oxford/Malden/Melbourne: Blackwell Publishing 2007, p. 47, 309.
- Hawk, BE, “International Antitrust Law & Policy: Fordham Corporate Law 2003”, Huntington: Juris Publishing 2004, p. 423.
- Hawkins, C, “Roman Artisans and the Urban Economy”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 120.
- Heckman, JJ, Nelson, RL, and Cabatingan, L, “Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law”, in: F Allen, and J Qian, “Comparing Legal and Alternative Institutions in Finance and Commerce”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2010, p. 128.
- Henderson, WO, “The Lancashire Cotton Famine 1861 - 65”, New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1969, p. 34.
- Hendrickson, KE, “The Encyclopedia of the Industrial Revolution in World History”, Band 3, London: Rowmann & Littlefield 2015, p. 103.
- Heremans, T, “Professional Services in the EU Internal Market: Quality Regulation and Self-Regulation”, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2012, p. 327.
- Hibbert, C, Weinreb, B, and Keay, J, “The London Encyclopaedia (3rd Edition)”, London: Macmillan London Limited 1983, p. 505.
- Hildebrand, D, “The Role of Economic Analysis in the EC Competition Rules”, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2009, p. 301.
- Hilty, RM, and Früh, A, “Lizenzkartellrecht: Schweizer Recht gespiegelt am US-amerikanischen und europäischen Recht”, Bern: Stämpfli Verlag AG 2017, p. 64.
- Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, “Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire”, in: N Hall (ed) “A ‘Quaker Confederation’? The great Liverpool cotton speculation of 1825 reconsidered”, Liverpool: Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, Vol. 151 2002, p. 1, 99.
- Hobbes, T, “Philosophicall Rudiments Concerning Government and Society (De Cive)”, London: J.C. for R. Royston 1651, p. 85.
- Hoffmann, G, “The Chemistry and Technology of Edible Oils and Fats and Their High Fat Products”, London/San Diego: Academic Press 1989, p. 201.
- Hofstadter, R, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1965.
- Hope, E, “Competition and Trade Policies: Coherence or Conflict”, London/New York: Routledge 2005, p. 61.
- Horn, J, Rosenband, LN, and Smith, MR, “Reconceptualizing the Industrial Revolution”, Cambridge/London: The MIT Press 2010, p. 157.
- Horspool, M, and Humphreys, M, “European Union Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012, p. 438, 439
- Hovenkamp, H, “The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution”, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press 2005, p. 2
- Huang, J, “Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2014, p. 58-59.
- Huszar, ML, “Rohstoffe als Investmentklasse: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse”, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag GmbH 2008, p. 4-5.
- Hylton, KN, “Antitrust Law and Economics”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2010, p. 24, 33, 50.
- Imwinkelried, EJ, and Friedman, RD, “The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Evidentiary Privileges”, Aspen: Aspen Law & Business Publishers 2002, p. 763.
- International Business Publications, “US: Importing into the Unites States Practical Guide”, Washington; International Business Publications 2008, p. 186.
- Ioannidou, M, “Consumer Involvement in Private EU Competition Law Enforcement”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 34.
- Jacobson, JM, “Antitrust Law Developments (sixth)”, Chicago: American Bar Association, Vol. 1, 2007, p. 433.
- Jänig, R, “Commercial Law: Selected Essays on the Law of Obligation, Insolvency and Arbitration”, Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2012, p. 125.
- Jayaram, R, and Kotwani, NR, “Industrial Economics and Telecommunication Regulations”, New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited 2012, p. 41.
- Jentzsch, N, “Financial Privacy: An International Comparison of Credit Reporting Systems”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2006, p. 89-94.
- Jiang, T, “China and EU Antitrust Review of Refusal to License IPR”, Antwerp: Maklu-Publishers 2015, p. 88, 141.
- Joelson, MR, “An International Antitrust Primer: A Guide to the Operation of United States, European Union and Other Key Competition Laws in the Global Economy”, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006, p. 371.
- Joliet, R, “The Rule of Reason in Antitrust Law”, The Hague: Martinus Nijhof 1967, p. xx-198.
- Jones, A, and Sufrin, BE, “EC Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008, p. 281, 404.
- Jones, A, and Sufrin, BE, “EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014, p. 259, 1073.
- Jones, A, and Sufrin, BE, “EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016, p. 22, 37, 163, 247, 372.
- Jung, T, and tom Dieck, MC, “Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: Empowering Human, Place and Business”, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG 2018, p. 148.
- Kaczorowska, A, “European Union Law”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge-Cavendish 2008, p. 774.
- Kaysen, C, and Turner, DF, “Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Analysis”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1959.
- Kehoe, DP, and McGinn, T, “Ancient Law, Ancient Society”, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2017, p. 126.
- King, R, “Jehovah Himself Has Become King”, Bloomington: AuthorHouse 2010, p. 252.
- Kingston, S, “Greening EU Competition Law and Policy”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012, p. 280.
- Kobrin, R, and Teller, A, “Purchasing Power: The Economics of Modern Jewish History”, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 2015, p. 201-202.
- Kokkoris, I, and Lianos, I, “The Reform of EC Competition Law: New Challenges”, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010, p. 402-403.
- Kolmar, M, “Principles of Microeconomics: An Integrative Approach”, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG 2017, p. 140.
- Komninos, A, “EC Private Antitrust Enforcement: Decentralised Application of EC Competition Law by National Courts”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2008, p. 151.
- Lafave, WR, and Scott, Jr., AW, “Substantive Criminal Law - 2nd Edition”, St. Paul: West Publishing Company 1986, p. 549.
- Lambert, L, “Spirituality, Inc.: Religion in the American Workplace”, New York/London: New York University Press 2009, p. 73.
- Landolt, PL, “Modernised EC Competition Law in International Arbitration”, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2006, p. 46, 237.
- Lanni, A, “Law and Order in Ancient Athens”, New York: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 1-27, 34.
- LaRue, PH, Applebaum, HM, Calvani, T, Collins, WD, Halverson, JT, Johnston, TW, Jones, JA, Rill, JF, Sayre, WM, Schlitt, L, and Whiting, RA, “The Robinson-Patman Act: Policy and Law – Vol. 1”, Chicago: American Bar Association 1989, p. 25.
- Leczykiewicz, D, and Weatherill, S, “The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships”, in: O Odudu (ed), “Competition Law and Contract: The EU Defence”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2013, p. 395.
- Leczykiewicz, D, and Weatherill, S, “The Images of the Consumer in EU Law: Legislation, Free Movement and Competition Law”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2016, p. 70.
- Lee, I, “Encyclopedia of E-Commerce Development, Implementation, and Management, Band 1”, Hershey: IGI Global 2016, p. 1985.
- Lees, FA, “Financial Exchanges: A Comparative Approach”, New York/Abingdon: Routledge 2012, p. 164.
- Leser, HG, “Gesammelte Schriften”, Band 1, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1968, p. 11.
- Lew, JDM, Mistelis, LA, and Kröll, SM, “Comparative International Commercial Arbitration”, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International 2003, p. 332.
- Li, S, “Managing International Business in Relation-Based versus Rule-Based Countries”, New York: Business Expert Press, LCC 2009, p. 49-50.
- Lianos, I, and Geradin, D, “Handbook on European Competition Law: Substantive Aspects”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2013, p. 160.
- Lista, A, “International Commercial Sales: The Sale of Goods on Shipment Terms”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2017, p. 4, 10-11.
- Looijestijn-Clearie, A, Rusu, CS, and Veenbrink, M, “Boosting the Enforcement of EU Competition Law at the Domestic Level”, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2017, p. 2.
- Lorenz, M, “An Introduction to EU Competition Law”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, p. 45, 51-52, 76, 189, 208, 237.
- Lytras, MD, Damiani, E, Carroll, JM, Avison, D, Tennyson, RD, Dale, A, Naeve, A, Lefrere, P, Tan, F, Sipior, J, and Vossen, G, “Visioning and Engineering the Knowledge Society - A Web Science Perspective”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2009, p. 501.
- Mack, CS, “The Executive's Handbook of Trade and Business Associations: How They Work-and How to Make Them Work Effectively for You”, New York/Westport/Connecticut/London: Quorum Books 1991, p. 14.
- Mackenrodt, M, Gallego, BC, and Enchelmaier, S, “Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms?”, in: P Këllezi (ed), “Abuse below the Threshold of Dominance? – Market Power, Market Dominance, and Abuse of Economic Dependence”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2008, p. 88, in: HKS Schmidt (ed), “Private Enforcement – Is Article 82 EC special?”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2008, p. 151.
- Madhavan, KS, “Business & Ethics - An Oxymoron?”, Bangalore: KS Madhavan, p. 40.
- Mallard, G, and Sgard, J, “Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 157.
- Malloy, RP, “Law in a Market Context: An Introduction to Market Concepts in Legal Reasoning”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004, p. 132.
- Mansell, R, “The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, 3 Volume Set, Volume 1”, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell 2015, p. 79.
- Mäntysaari, P, “The Law of Corporate Finance: General Principles and EU Law - Volume II: Contracts in General”, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2010, p. 159.
- Marciano, A, “Law and Economics: A Reader”, in: TJ Zywicki (ed), “The Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Analysis”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2009, p. 364.
- Mark, J, Strange, R, and Burns, J, “The Food Industries, Vol. XXVIII”, London: Chapman & Hall 1993, p. 236.
- Marsden, P, “Handbook of Research in Trans-Atlantic Antitrust”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2006, p. 268.
- Martínez, JP, “Net Neutrality: Contributions to the Debate”, Madrid: Fundación Telefónica 2011, p. 139.
- Marx, K, “Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations”, New York: International Publishers 1965, p. 30, 37, 104 [edited version by E. J. Hobsbawm].
- Mathis, K, “Law and Economics in Europe: Foundations and Applications”, Dordrecht: Springer 2014, p. 374.
- Mattli, W, and Dietz, T, “International Arbitration & Global Governance: Contending Theories and Evidence”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014, p. 190.
- McGinn, TAJ, “Obligations in Roman Law: Past, Present, and Future”, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2012, p. 201.
- McNutt, PA, “Law, Economics and Antitrust: Towards a New Perspective”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2005, p. 136.
- Meisel, JW, “"Now" or Never: Is There Antitrust Liability for Noncommercial Boycotts?”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 6 1980, p. 1317.
- Mendonca, M, and Kanungo, RN, “Ethical Leadership”, New York: Open University Press 2007, p. 15.
- Merkin, R, and Flannery, L, “Arbitration Act 1996”, Abingdon, Oxon: Informa Law 2014, p. 24, 32-33.
- Miller, R, and Jentz, G, “Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law Today: The Essentials”, Mason: Thomson West 2008, p. 674.
- Miller, RL, “Business Law Today, Comprehensive: Text and Cases: Diverse, Ethical, Online, and Global Environment – 10th Edition”, Stamford: Cengage Learning 2015, p. 886.
- Miller, RL, “Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law Today, The Essentials: Text and Summarized Cases – 11th Edition”, Boston: Cengage Learning 2015, p. 617.
- Mitchell, CE, “Contract Law and Contract Practice: Bridging the Gap between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2013, p. 30.
- Molenaar, C, “E-Marketing: Applications of information technology and the internet within marketing”, Abingdon: Routledge 2012, p. 105.
- Monti, G, “EC Competition Law”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007, p. 99, 192, 486.
- Morgan, J, “Contract Law Minimalism: A Formalist Restatement of Commercial Contract Law”, Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press 2013, p. 208.
- Morgan, J, “Great Debates in Contract Law”, London: Palgrave 2015, p. 88.
- Musmann, AC, “Recht und soziale Sanktionen: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des grenzüberschreitenden Baumwollhandels”, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2018.
- Nazzini, R, “The Foundations of European Union Competition Law: The Objective and Principles of Article 102”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011, p. 170, 185.
- Nee, I, “Managing Negative Word-of-Mouth on Social Media Platforms: The Effect of Hotel Management Responses on Observers’ Purchase Intention”, Bremen: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016, p. 2.
- Neergaard, U, Szyszczak, E, van de Gronden, JW, and Krajewski, M, “Social Services of General Interest in the EU”, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press 2013, p. 280.
- Newmann, P, “The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law: Three Volume Set”, London: Palgrave Macmillan 2002, p. 93.
- Nguyen, B, and Wait, A, “Essentials of Microeconomics”, Abingdon/New York: Routledge 2016, p. 77.
- Nistor, L, “Public Services and the European Union: Healthcare, Health Insurance and Education Services”, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press 2011, p. 183.
- Norman, P, “The Risk Controllers: Central Counterparty Clearing in Globalised Financial Markets”, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 2011, p. 60.
- Nygh, PE, “Autonomy in International Contracts”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999, p. 92.
- O’Donoghue, R, and Padilla, AJ, “The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC”, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006, p. 440-442.
- O’Donoghue, R, and Padilla, AJ, “The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC”, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2013, p. 282-283.
- Oltuski, A, “Precious Objects: A Story of Diamonds, Family, and a Way of Life”, New York: Scribner 2011, p. 76.
- Oswald, LJ, “The Law of Marketing – 2th Edition”, Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning 2010, p. 112.
- Ottow, A, “Market and Competition Authorities: Good Agency Principles”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 154.
- Oxford Corpus, “Shorter Oxford English Dictionary: Sixth Edition”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
- Papadopoulos, AS, “The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010, p. 272.
- Parcu, PL, Monti, G, and Botta, M, “Abuse of Dominance in EU Competition Law: Emerging Trends”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2017, p. 2.
- Pareto, V, “Manual of Political Economy”, New York: Kelley 1906.
- Parker, R, “Polytheism and Society at Athens”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005, p. 9.
- Patel, KK, and Schweitzer, H, “The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, p. 209.
- Perelman, C, “Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning”, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company 1980, p. 59.
- Perle, EG, Fischer, MA, and Williams, JT, “Perle and Williams on Publishing Law”, Austin/Boston/Chicago/New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2009, p. 10-11.
- Polinsky, AM, and Shavell, S, “Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 2”, Amsterdam: Elsevier 2007, p. 1604.
- Posner, RA, “Law and Social Norms”, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press 2000, p. 172.
- Posner, RA, “Antitrust Law, Second Edition”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2001, p. 194-195.
- Posner, RA, “Economics Analysis of Law”, New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2014, para. 8.6.
- Redfern, A, and Hunter, M, “Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration”, London: Sweet & Maxwell 2004, p. 24, 387.
- Revuelta, MB, “Mineral Resources: From Exploration to Sustainability Assessment”, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG 2018, p. 44.
- Richman, BD, “Stateless Commerce: The Diamond Network and the Persistence of Relational Exchange”, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press 2017, p. 14, 42-43, 77.
- Richman BD, et al, “Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 9, Is. 2”, in: B. D. Richman (ed), “An Autopsy of Cooperation: Diamond Dealers and the Limits of Trust-based Exchange”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017, p. 251, 255-256.
- Rißmann, K, “Die kartellrechtliche Beurteilung der Markenabgrenzung”, Munich: Herbert Utz Verlag 2008, p. 108.
- Ritter, L, and Braun, WD, “European Competition Law: A Practitioner's Guide”, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2005, p. 249.
- Robbins, D, “Handbook of Public Sector Economics”, Boca Raton: CRC Press 2005, p.185.
- Robbins, P, “Stolen Fruit: The Tropical Commodities Disaster”, London/New York: Zed Books 2003, p. 167.
- Robinson, Jr., L, “Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same”, Heidelberg/Dordrecht/New York/London: Springer 2012, p. 304.
- Roche, J, “The International Cotton Trade”, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing 1994, p. 17.
- Rubino-Sammartano, M, “International Arbitration: Law and Practice, Third Edition”, New York: JurisNet 2014, p. 1085-1086.
- Saferstein, HI, and Everett, JC, “State Antitrust Practice and Statutes (Fourth)”, Chicago: American Bar Association 2009, p. 10-3, 10-4.
- Sanchez-Taínta, AS, “The Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease through the Mediterranean Diet”, London/San Diego/Cambridge/Oxford: Elsevier 2018, p. 49.
- Šarčević, P, “Essays on International Commercial Arbitration”, London/Dordrecht/Boston: Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff 1989, p. 69.
- Sauter, W, “Coherence in EU Competition Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016, p. 75-87, 101, 256.
- Schmitthoff, CM, “The Unification of the Law of International Trade”, London: Sweet & Maxwell 1968.
- Schofield, NC, “Commodity Derivatives: Markets and Applications”, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons 2007, p. 75.
- Schoon, N, “Modern Islamic Banking: Products and Processes in Practice”, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 2016, p. 117.
- Shaffer, BD, “In Restraint of Trade”, Cranbury/London/Mississauga: Associated University Presses 1997, p. 64.
- Shemtov, N, “Beyond the Code: Protection of Non-Textual Features of Software”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017, p. 65.
- Shield, RS, “Diamond Stories: Enduring Change on 47th Street”, London: Cornell University Press 2002, p. 92, 190-192.
- Slot, PJ, and Farley, M, “An Introduction to Competition Law”, Oxford/London/Portland: Hart Publishing 2017, p. 56.
- Sörling, SU, et al., “Studies presented to Pontus Hellström”, in: BL Sjöberg, “The Greek oikos: a space for interaction, revisited and reconsidered”, Uppsala: S. U. Sörling et al. 2014, p. 315.
- Stein, U, “Lex mercatoria: Realität und Theorie”, Band 28, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann 1995 p. 188.
- Stoyanova, M, “Competition Problems in Liberalized Telecommunications: Regulatory Solutions to Promote Effective Competition”, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2008, p. 144.
- Stuyck, J, Gilliams, H, and Ballon, E, “Modernisation of European Competition Law: The Commission's Proposal for a New Regulation Implementing Articles 81 and 82 EC”, Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia 2002, p. 108.
- Subrin, S, and Woo, MYK, “Litigating in America: Civil Procedure in Context”, New York: Aspen Publishers 2006, p. 165.
- Sullivan, ET, “Nonprice Predation under Section 2 of the Sherman Act”, Chicago: American Bar Association 1991, p. 55, 58.
- Sumangla, R, and Panwar, A, “Capturing, Analyzing, and Managing Word-of-Mouth in the Digital Marketplace”, Hershey: IGI Global 2016, p. 172
- Sutherland, EE, “Law Making and the Scottish Parliament”, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2011, p. 314.
- Terlinden, U, “City and Gender: Intercultural Discourse on Gender, Urbanism and Architecture”, Opladen: Leske + Budrich 2003, p. 43.
- Thorson, B, “Individual Rights in EU Law”, Oslo: Springer International 2016, p. 131.
- Tietje, C, and Brouder, A, “Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes”, Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009, p. 656-657, 659.
- Tittle, P, “Ethical Issues in Business: Inquiries, Cases, and Readings”, Petersborough: Peg Tittle 2000, p. 41.
- Todd, JA, “The Cotton World: A Survey of the World's Cotton Supplies and Consumption”, London: Sir I. Pitman & Sons 1927, p. 91.
- Townley, C, “Article 81 EC and Public Policy”, Portland: Hart Publishing 2009, p. 64, 273.
- Townsend, T, “Cotton Trading Manual”, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited 2005, p. iii.
- Travaux du Comité français de droit international privé, “Droit international privé:”, in: B Goldman (ed), “La lex mercatoria dans les contrats et l'arbitrage internationaux: réalité et perspectives”, Paris: Travaux du Comité français de droit international privé 1979, p. 221-270.
- Ullrich, H, “The Evolution of European Competition Law: Whose Regulation, Which Competition?”, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2006, p. 348.
- Union Internationale Des Advocats, “Arbitrage International Commercial, Vol. II”, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 1960, p. 393.
- Vakerics, TV, “Antitrust Basics”, New York: Law Journal Press 2006, p. , 5-3, 6-40.
- van Bael & Bellis (firm), “Competition Law of the European Community”, The Hague: Kluwer Law Internationaal 2005, p. 52, 101, 438.
- van Boom, WH, Giesen, I, and Verheij, AJ, “Gedrag en privaatrecht: Over gedragspresumpties en gedragseffecten bij privaatrechtelijke leerstukken”, in: J van Erp, “Naming en shaming in het contractenrecht? Het reputatie-effect van schadevergoedingen tussen ondernemingen”, The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers 2008, p. 166.
- van der Hof, S, van den Berg, B, and Schermer, B, “Minding Minors Wandering the Web: Regulating Online Child Safety”, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press 2014, p. 136.
- Vishny, PH, “Guide to International Commerce Law”, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc. 1984, p. 2.
- Waters, TJ, and Morse, RH, “Antitrust & Trade Associations: How Trade Regulation Laws Apply to Trade and Professional Associations”, Chicago: American Bar Association 1996, p. 58, 65.
- Watson, L, and Watson, P, “Juvenal: Satire 6”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014, 196.
- Welch, PJ, and Welch, GF, “Economics: Theory and Practice – Ninth Edition”, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons 2010, p. 408.
- Wendt, IE, “EU Competition Law and Liberal Professions: an Uneasy Relationship?”, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV 2013, p. 220, 269, 384, 512.
- Wengler, S, “Key Account Management in Business-to-Business Markets: An Assessment of Its Economic Value”, Berlin: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag 2006, p. 112.
- Wesseling, R, “The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Law”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2000, p. 116-117.
- Whish, R, and Bailey, D, “Competition Law: Eighth Edition”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 54, 174-174, 595.
- Williamson, OE, “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”, New York: Macmillan 1985, p. 20.
- Wu, Q, “Competition Laws, Globalization and Legal Pluralism: China's Experience”, Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2013, p. 28.
- Zamir, E, and Teichman, D, “The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law”, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014, p. 440.
- Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information, 405 F.Supp.2d 1141 (C.D. Cal. 2005).
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982, 992 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
- United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34, 59 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
- Covad Communications Company v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 398 F.3d 666, 672 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
- United States v. King, 229 F. 275 (D. Mass. 1915).
- United States v. Kansas City Star Company, No. 18444 (D. Kans. 1953).
- Pretz v. Holstein Friesian Ass’n, 698 F. Supp. 1531, 1539 (D. Kans. 1988).
- United States v. Otter Tail Power Co., 331 F. Supp. 54, 61 (D. Minn. 1971).
- Charleton v. Vt. Dairy Herd Improvement Ass’n, 782 F. Supp. 926, 932 (D. Vt. 1991).
- In re Educ. Testing Serv. Litig., 429 F. Supp. 2d 752, 759 (E.D. La. 2005).
- McElhinney v. Medical Protective Co., 549 F. Supp. 121, 132 (E.D. Ky. 1982).
- Bennett v. Cardinal Health Marmac Distribs., 2003-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) 74, 137 (E.D.N.Y. 2003).
- Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp., 195 F.3d 1346, 1356, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
- Blalock v. Ladies Professional Golf Association, 359 F. Supp. 1260, 1265-1266 (N.D. Ga. 1973).
- Choiceparts v. General Motors Corporation, No. 01 C 0067 (N.D. Ill. 2005), para. 12.
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Slekardis, 34 N.Y.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974).
- Matarasso v. Continental Casualty Co., 56 N.Y.2d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982).
- Rabinowitz v. Olewski, 473 N.Y.S.2d 232, 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984).
- Goldfinger v. Lisker, 500 N.E.2d 857, 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986).
- Abraham v. Diamond Dealers, 896 N.Y.S.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010).
- Antco Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Sidermar S. p. A., 417 F. Supp. 207 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), para. 215.
- United States v. Western Winter Sports Representatives Ass’n, Inc., 1962, Trade Cas. (CCH) 74,263 (W.D. Penn. 1973).
- Clamp-All Corp. v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute, 851 F.2d 478, 490, 492 (1st Cir. 1988).
- Fraser v. Major League Soccer, 284 F.3d 47, 59 (1st Cir. 2002).
- Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of R.I., 373 F.3d 57, 61 (1st Cir. 2004).
- United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corp., 291 F.2d 563, 572-573 (2nd Cir. 1961).
- Volvo North America Corp. v. Men’s Int’l Prof’l Tennis Council, 857 F.2d 55, 74 (2nd Cir. 1988).
- Worldcrisa Corp. v. Armstrong, 129 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 1997), para. 74.
- Bogan v. Hodgkins, 166 F.3D 509, 515 (2nd Cir. 1999).
- Smith/Enron Cogeneration Ltd. P’ship. v. Smith Cogeneration Int’l Inc., 198 F.3d 88 (2nd Cir.1999), para. 49.
- Satellite Television & Associated Resources, Inc. v. Continental Cablevision, 714 F.2d 351, 358 (4th Cir. 1983).
- Heattransfer Corp. v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 553 F.2d 964, 981 (5th Cir. 1977).
- United States v. Cont’Group 603 f.2d 444, 463 (5th Cir. 1979).
- United States v. Realty Multi-List Inc., 629 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1980), para. 107.
- Adjusters Replace-A-Car, Inc. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc., 735 F.2d 884, 887-888 (5th Cir. 1984).
- United States v. American Airlines, Inc., 743 F.2D, 1114, 1116-1117 (5th Cir. 1984).
- Brown v. Pacific Life Ins. Co., 462 F.3d 384, 396 (5th Cir. 2006).
- Spirit Airlines v. Northwest Airlines, 431 F.3d 917, 935-936 (6th Cir. 2005).
- MCI Communications Corp. v. AT&T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1113, 1132, 1143 (7th Cir. 1982).
- Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc., 784 F.2d 1325, 1338-1339 (7th Cir. 1986).
- Great Escape, Inc. v. Union City Body Co., 791 F.2d 532, 540-541 (7th Cir. 1986).
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Marshfield Clinic, 65 F.3d 1406, 1411 (7th Cir. 1995)
- United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1976).
- Trace X Chemical v. Canadian Industries, 738 F.2d 261, 266, 268 (8th Cir. 1984).
- Conoco, Inc. v. Inman Oil Company, Inc. 774 F.2d 895, 905 (8th Cir. 1985).
- General Industries Corp., 810 F.2d 795, 801 (8th Cir. 1987).
- City of Malden v. Union Elec. Co., 887 F.2d 157, 160 (8th Cir. 1989)
- Craftsmen Limousine v. Ford Motor Co., 491 F.3d 380, 389 (8th Cir. 2007).
- Deesen v. Professional Golfers' Association of America, 358 F. 2d 165 (9th Cir. 1966).
- Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc., 627 F.2d 919, 926 (9th Cir. 1980).
- Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 848 F.2d 976, 983 (9th Cir. 1988).
- City of Anaheim v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 955 F.2d 1373, 1380 (9th Cir. 1992).
- Nova Designs, Inc. v. Scuba Retailers Association, 202 F.3d 1088, 1092 (9th 2000).
- County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Cmty. Hosp., 236 F.3d 1148, 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), para. IV, A, I.
- Paladin Assoc., Inc. v. Mont. Power Co., 328 F.3d 1145, 1158 (9th Cir. 2003).
- Nagrampa v. MailCoups, Inc., 469 F.3d 1257 (9th Cir. 2006), para. 43.
- Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc., 703 F.2d 432, 438 (10th Cir. 1983).
- Gregory v. Fort Bridger Rendezvous Ass'n, 448 F.3d 1195, 1201 (10th Cir. 2006).
- CHA-Car, Inc. v. Calder Race Source, Inc., 752 F.2D 609, 613 (11th Cir. 1985).
- McGahee v. N. Propane Gas Co., 858 F.2d 1487, 1505 (11th Cir. 1988).
- Key Enterprises of Delaware v. Venice Hosp, 919 F.2d 1550, 1564 (11th Cir. 1990).
- Thompson v. Metro. Multi-List, Inc. 934 F.2d 1566, 1582 (11th Cir. 1991).
- Bailey v. Allgas, Inc., 284 F.3d 1237, 1250 (11th Cir. 2002).
- Morris Communications Corp. v. PGA Tour, 364 F.3d 1288, 1294 (11th Cir. 2004).
- Brief for the United States As Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Reiter, 442 U.S. 330 (1979) (No. 78-690), 1979 WL 213494, para. 12.
- Montague & Co. v. Lowry, 193 U.S. 38, 44 (1904).
- Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 62 (1911).
- United States v. American Tobacco Company, 221 U.S. 106 (1911).
- United States v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n, 224 U.S. 383 (1912).
- Eastern States Lumber Assn. v. United States, 234 U. S. 600, 601, 605, 608, 614 (1914).
- United States v. United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919).
- American Column & Lumber Co. v. United States, 257 U.S. 377 (1921).
- United States v. American Linseed Oil Co., 262 U.S. 371 (1923).
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States, 306 U.S. 208, 227 (1939).
- Fashion Originators' Guild v. Federal Trade Comm'n, 312 U. S. 457, 458, 465, 468 (1941).
- American Medical Assn. v. United States, 317 U.S. 519, 535-536 (1943).
- Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1, 2, 23 (1945).
- American Tobacco v. United States, 328 U.S. 781, 809 (1946).
- United States v. Griffith, 334 U.S. 100, 107-108 (1948).
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Seagram & Sons, 340 U. S. 211, 214 (1951).
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U. S. 594, 625 (1953).
- Yates v. United States 354 U.S. 298, 334 (1957).
- Northern Pacific R. Go. v. United States, 356 U. S. 1, 5 (1958).
- Klor’s, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., 359 U.S. 207, 212-213 (1959).
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Co., 364 U.S. 656, 659 (1961).
- Silver v. New York Stock Exch. 373 U.S. 341 (1963).
- United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 570 (1966).
- Fed. Maritime Comm’n v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien, 390 U.S. 238, 250 (1968).
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc., 441 U.S. 1 (1979), para. E.
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 (1979).
- Mid-Texas Communications v. Am. Tel. Tel., 615 F.2d 1372, 1389 n. 13 (5th Cir. 1980).
- Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp. v Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24-27 (1983) and Southland Copperweld v. Independence Tube, 467 U.S. 752 (1984), para. III.
- Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1, para. 12 (1984).
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Serv. Corp., 465 U.S. 752, 764, 768 (1984).
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Svc. Corp., 465 U.S. 752, 768 (1984).
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985).
- NW Wholesale Stationers v. Pac. Stationery, 472 U.S. 284, 287, 293-297 (1985).
- Matsushita v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986).
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447, 456 (1993).
- NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128, 134 (1998).
- California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission, 526 U.S. 756, 763, 780 (1999).
- Verizon Commc’ns Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398, 407 (2004).
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. (2006) [J. Thomas, dissenting], para. 8.
- Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007).
- Rhone Mediterranee v. Achille Lauro [1983] 712 F. 2nd 50.
- Federal Bulk Carriers v C Itoh & Co default [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 103.
- Aughton Limited (formerly Aughton Group Limited) v. M.F. Kent Services Limited, [1991] 57 BLR 1.
- Trygg Hansa Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Equitas Ltd, [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 439.
- Azov Shipping co. v. Baltic Shipping co. [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 68, para. 5 and 31
- Vale Do Rio Doce Navegacao SA & Anor v Shanghai Bao Steel Ocean Shipping Co Ltd. [2000] EWHC 205 (Comm), para. 45.
- Competition Appeal Tribunal 19 March 2002, case 1005/1/101 (Aberdeen Journals Limited v. Director General of Fair Trading), [2002] CAT 4, para. 96-97.
- Downing v. Al Tameer Establishment [2002] EWCA Civ 721.
- Mackley & Co Ltd v Gosport Marina Ltd [2002] EWHC 1315, para. 20, 22, 39.
- Esso Exploration and Production UK Ltd v. Electricity Supply Board [2004] EWHC 787 (Comm).
- Welex AG v. Rosa Maritime Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 938.
- Albon v. Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd (No 3) [2007] Lloyd’s Rep. L.
- Sea Trade Maritime Corporation v. Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The "Athena") (No 2), [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 280, para. 64-65.
- Stretford v. The Football Association Ltd et al (CA) [2007] EWCA Civ 238, para. 38, 67.
- Sukuman Ltd v. Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, para. 36.
- Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v. Richards [2011] EWCA Civ 855.
- Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v. AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent), [2011] EWCA Civ 647.
- Joint Stock Company "Aeroflot Russian Airlines" v. Berezovsky et al [2012] EWHC 1610 (Ch), para. 73.
- Lombard North Central plc et al. v. GATX Corporation [2012] EWHC 1067 (Comm), para. 21.
- Assaubayev et al v. Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd, [2014] EWCA Civ 1491.
- Toyota Tsusho Sugar Trading Ltd v. Prolat S.R.L [2014] EWHC 3649 (Comm), para. 2.
- Commission, Competition in a media sector, press releases RAPID “Dutch fishermen allowed to land and auction catches in foreign ports following Commission action” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-01-84_en.htm?locale=EN).
- Commission, Competition in a media sector, press releases RAPID “Commission closes investigations into FIFA regulations on international football transfers” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-02-824_en.htm?locale=EN); “Commission, concerning Case IV / 36 583-SETCA-FGTB / FIFA” (to access: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/36583/36583_54_3.pdf).
- Commission, Competition in a media sector, press releases RAPID “Antitrust: Commission welcomes steps taken by collective rights management bodies in Hungary and Romania to improve competition” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/11/284&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN).
- Commission, press release IP/ 17/3622 of 2 October 2017 “Commission fines Lithuanian Railways €28 million for hindering competition on rail freight market” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-3622_en.htm).
- Commission, press release IP/ 17/3622 of 2 October 2017 “Commission fines Lithuanian Railways €28 million for hindering competition on rail freight market” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-3622_en.htm).
- Commission, press release IP/01/1641 of 23 November 2001 “Commission settles Marathon case with Thyssengas” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-01-1641_en.htm).
- Commission, press release IP/04/573 “Commission settles Marathon case with Gaz de France and Ruhrgas” (to access: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-04-573_e.htm).
- Commission Decision of 18 July 1975 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/21.353 (Kabelmetal-Luchaire), para. 11.
- Commission Decision of 21 November 1975 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/256 (Bomée-Stichting), para. II.
- Commission Decision of 2 December 1977 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/28.948 (Cauliflowers), para. II (4).
- Commission Decision of 2 December 1977 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/147 (Centraal Bureau voor de Rijwielhandel), para. 6, 28-29, 36.
- Commission Decision of 20 July 1978 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 (1) TFEU], Case No IV/28.852 (GB-Inno-BM/Fedetab), Case No IV/29.127 (Mestdagh-Huyghebaert/Fedetab), Case No IV/29.149 (Fedetab Recommendation), para. 123.
- Commission Decision of 5 December 1979 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/29.011 (Rennet), para. 30.
- Commission Decision of 9 July 1980 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.958 (National Sulphuric Acid Association), para. 47.
- Commission Decision of 10 July 1985 relating to a proceeding under Article 2 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 applying rules of competition to transport by rail, road and inland waterway, Case No IV/31.029 (French inland waterway charter traffic: EATE levy), para. 51.
- Commission Decision of 13 December 1985 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.590 (London Sugar Futures Market Limited).
- Commission Decision of 13 December 1985 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.591 (London Cocoa Terminal Market Association Limited).
- Commission Decision of 13 December 1985 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.592 (Coffee Terminal Market Association of London Limited).
- Commission Decision of 13 December 1985 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.593 (London Rubber Terminal Market Association Limited).
- Commission Decision of 10 December 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/29.688 (The London Grain Futures Market).
- Commission Decision of 10 December 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/30.176 (The London Potato Futures Association Limited).
- Commission Decision of 10 December 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/31.614 (The London Meat Futures Exchange Limited), para. 12, 18.
- Commission Decision of 10 December 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/29.036 (The GAFTA Soya Bean Meal Futures Association).
- Commission Decision of 4 December 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/30.439 (Petroleum Exchange of London Limited).
- Commission Decision of 18 July 1988 relating to a proceeding under Article 86 of the EEC Treaty, Case No IV/30.178 (Napier Brown - British Sugar).
- Commission Decision of 28 October 1988 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/B-2/31.424, Hudson's Bay-Dansk Pelsdyravlerforening, para. 1 (a), 9, 10, 11.
- Commission Decision of 12 December 1988 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/27.393 and IV/27.394 (Publishers Association - Net Book Agreements), para. 73.
- Commission Decision of 26 February 1992 relating to a procedure pursuant to Articles 85 and 86 of the EEC Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU], Case No IV/33.544 (British Midland v. Aer Lingus), para. 5, 26-27.
- Commission Decision of 23 December 1992 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 85 [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/32.448 and IV/32.450 (Cewal, Cowac and Ukwal) and 86 [now Article 102 TFEU], Case No IV/32.448 and IV/32.450 (Cewal) of the EEC Treaty, para. 86.
- Commission Decision of 11 June 1993 relating a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/32.150 (EBU/Eurovision System), para. 59-67.
- Commission Decision of 21 December 1993 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 86 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU], Case No IV/34.689 (Sea Containers v. Stena Sealink), para. 12, 41, 66, 75.
- Commission Decision of 13 July 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/C/33.833 (Cartonboard).
- Commission Decision of 30 November 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No IV/33.126 and 33.322 (Cement).
- Commission Decision of 11 March 1998 relating to a proceeding under Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU], Case No IV/34.073, IV/34.395 and IV/35.436 (Van den Bergh Foods Limited), para. 224.
- Commission Decision of 24 January 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty [Article 101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, Case No IV.F.1/36.718 (CECED), para. 55-57.
- Commission Decision of 14 July 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU], Case No IV/D-2/34.780 (Virgin/British Airways), para. 87-88, 90-91
- Commission Decision of 31 July 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, Case No COMP/37.462 (Identrus), para. 46.
- Commission Decision of 5 December 2001, Case No IV/37.614/F3 PO (Interbrew and Alken-Maes), para. 223.
- Commission Decision of 27 August 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU], Case No COMP/37.685 (GVG/FS), para. 132, 141, 152.
- Commission Decision of 30 April 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU], Case No COMP/D/32.448 and 32/450 (Compagnie Maritime Belge), para. 35-36.
- Commission Decision of 24 May 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU] and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement against Microsoft Corporation, Case No COMP/C-3/37.792 (Microsoft), para. 18, 589, 984.
- Commission Decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, Case No COMP/C2/38.698 (CISAC), para. 18, 125.
- Commission Decision of 8 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU], Case No 39.401 (E.ON/GDF), para. 265.
- Commission Decision of 14 October 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty [now Article 101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, Case No COMP/39.416 (Ship classification), para. 3 (f) (g).
- Commission Decision of 22 June 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Case No COMP/39.525 (Telekomunikacja Polska), para. 874.
- Commission Decision of 23 January 2013 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Case No COMP/39.839 (Telefónica/Portugal Telecom), para. 444.
- Commission Decision of 19 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, Case No AT.39864 (BASF), para. 26.
- Order of the President of the CFI of 21 January 2004, case T-245/03R (Fédération Nationale des Syndicats d'Exploitants Agricoles (FNSEA) et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1996] ECR I-4971, para. 45.
- Order of the President of the CFI of 14 December 2000, case T‑5/00 R (Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v. Commission of the European Communities), [2000] ECR II‑4121, para. 56, 64.
- Order of the President of the CFI of 21 January 2004, case T-217/03R (Federation nationale de la coopération bétail v. Commission of the European Communities), [2004] ECR II-241, para. 52-54.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Kirschner of 21 February 1990, case T-5I/89 (Tetra Pak Rausing SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1990] ECR II-309, para. 68, 72.
- CFI 10 July 1990, Case T-51/89 (Tetra Pak Rausing SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1990] ECR II-309, para. 42.
- CFI 12 December 1991, Case T-30/89 (Hilti AG v. Commission of the European Communities), [1991] ECR II-1439, para. 92, 118.
- CFI 10 March 1992, joined cases T-68/89, T-77/89 and T-78/89 (Società Italiana Vetro SpA, Fabbrica Pisana SpA and PPG Vernante Pennitalia SpA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1992] ECR II-01403, para. 35.
- CFI 2 July 1992, Case T-61/89 (Dansk Pelsdyravlerforening v. Commission of the European Communities), [1992] ECR II-1931, para. 64, 78.
- CFI 22 April 1993, Case T-9/92 (Automobiles Peugeot SA and Peugeot SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1993] ECR II-493, para. 27.
- CFI 23 February 1994, joined cases T-39/92 and T-40/92 (Groupement des Cartes Bancaires "CB" and Europay International SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1994] ECR II-49113, para. 114.
- CFI 15 July 1994, Case T-17/93 (Matra Hachette SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1994] ECR II-595, para. 85, 135.
- CFI 6 October 1994, Case T-83/91 (Tetra Pak International SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1994] ECR II-00755, para. 83-84, 138.
- CFI 6 April 1995, Case T-141/89 (Tréfileurope Sales SARL v. Commission of the European Communities), [1995] ECR II-791, para. 96.
- CFI 8 October 1996, joined cases T-24/93, T-25/93, T-26/93 and T-28/93 (Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA and Compagnie Maritime Belge SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1996] ECR 11-1201, para. 107, 170, 172, 182-183,185.
- CFI 15 September 1998, joined cases T-374/94, T-375/94, T-384/94 and T-388/94 (European Night Services Ltd (ENS) et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1998] ECR II-1533, para. 203.
- CFI 27 November 1998, Case T-290/94 (Fort James France, formerly Kaysersberg SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1997] ECR II-2137, para. 178–179.
- CFI 15 March 2000, joined cases T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T 46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95 and T-104/95 (Cimenteries CBR et al v. Commission), [2000] ECR II-491.
- CFI 21 March 2001, Case T-206/99 (Métropole Television SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [2001] ECR II-1057, para. 37.
- CFI 18 September 2001, Case T-112/99 (Métropole télévision (M6) et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2001] ECR II-2459, para. 74, 76.
- CFI 28 February 2002, Case T-395/94 (Atlantic Container Line AB et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2002] ECR II-595, para. 330.
- CFI 6 June 2002, case T-342/99 (Airtours plc. v. Commission of the European Communities), [2002] ECR II-2585, para. 62.
- CFI 30 September 2003, joined cases T-191/98, T-212/98 to T-214/98 (Atlantic Container Line AB et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2003] ECR II-3275, para. 239, 939, 1112, 1456.
- CFI 23 October 2003, Case T-65/98 (Van den Bergh Foods Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities), [2003] ECR II-4653, para. 84, 107, 139.
- CFI 17 December 2003, Case T-219/99 (British Airways plc v. Commission of the European Communities), [2003] ECR II-05917, para. 293.
- CFI 26 January 2005, Case T-193/02 (Laurent Piau v. Commission of the European Communities), [2005] ECR II-209, para. 111.
- CFI 27 July 2005, joined cases T-49/02 to T-51/02 85 (Brasserie nationale SA (formerly Brasseries Funck-Bricher and Bofferding) et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2005] ECR II-3033, para. 85.
- CFI 2 May 2006, Case T-328/03 (O2 (Germany) GmbH & Co. OHG v. Commission of the European Communities), [2006] ECR II-1231, para. 66, 69, 71, 73.
- CFI 27 September 2006, Case T-204/03 (Haladjian Frères v Commission), [2006], ECR II-03779, para. 28, 34, 36.
- CFI 12 December 2006, Case T-155/04 (SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v. Commission of the European Communities), [2006] ECR II-04797, para. 50.
- CFI 17 September 2007, Case T-201/04 (Microsoft Corp. v. Commission of the European Communities), [2007] ECR II-3601, para. 105, 275, 280, 442, 482, 1313.
- CFI 1 July 2008, case T‑276/04 (Compagnie Maritime Belge SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [2008] ECR II-1277.
- CFI 9 September 2009, Case T‑301/04 (Clearstream Banking AG and Clearstream International SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [2009] ECR II-3155, para. 47, 132.
- GC 1 July 2010, Case T-321/05 (AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca plc v. European Commission), [2010] ECR II-2805, para. 360, 824, 826.
- GC 23 November 2011, Case T-320/07 (Jones et al v. Commission), [2011], ECR II-00417, para. 115.
- GC 24 May 2012, Case T-111/08 (MasterCard, Inc. et al v. European Commission), [2012] ECR II-000, para. 87.
- GC 12 April 2013, Case T-442/08 (International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) et al v. European Commission), [2013] 5 CMLR, para. 12, 20.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Darmon of 20 November 1986, case 45/85 (Verband der Sachversicherer v. Commission of the European Communities), [1987] ECR 405, p. 438.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Lenz of 16 June 1994, Case C-360/92P (The Publishers Association v. Commission of the European Communities), [1995] ECR I-23, para. 43, 47.
- Joined Opinion of the Advocate-General Tesauro of 12 September 1995, joined cases C-319/93, C-40/94, C-224/94, and C-399/93 (Dijkstra v Friesland (Frico Domo) Coöperatie BA and Cornelis van Roessel et al v. De coöperatieve vereniging Zuivelcoöperatie Campina Melkunie VA and Willem de Bie et al v. De Coöperatieve Zuivelcoöperatie Campina Melkunie BA), [1995] ECR I-4515, para. 10, 31.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer of 27 June 1996, Case C-333/94P (Tetra Pak International SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1996] ECR I-5951, para. 57.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Fennelly of 29 October 1998, joined cases C-395/96P, C-396/96P (Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports SA et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2000] ECR I-1365, para. 143, 144, 151, 152, 162.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Jacobs of 28 January 1999, joined cases C-115/97, C-116/97 and C-117/97 and Case C-219/97 (Albany International BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie), [1999] ECR I-5751, para. 272.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Jacobs of 28 October 2004, Case C-53/03 (Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & Akarnanias (Syfait) et al v. GlaxoSmithKline plc und GlaxoSmithKline AEVE), [2005] ECR I-4609, para. 72.
- Opinion of the Advocate-General Poiares Maduro of 23 May 2007, Case C-438/05 (International Transport Workers' Federation v. Viking Line ABP et al), [2008] IRLR 143, para. 7.
- Opinion of the Advocate General of 19 February 2009, case C-8/08 (T-Mobile Netherlands BV et al v. Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit), [2009] ECR I-04529, para. 55.
- ECJ 30 June 1966, Case 56/65 (Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v. Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (M.B.U.)), [1966] ECR 235, p. 249.
- ECJ 13 July 1966, joined cases 56 and 58-64 (Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v. Commission of the European Economic Community) [1966] ECR 299, p. 249, 341-342, 348.
- ECJ 12 December 1967, Case C-23/67 (SA Brasserie de Haecht v. Consorts Wilkin-Janssen), [1967] ECR 525, p. 415.
- ECJ 9 July 1969, Case 5-69 (Franz Völk v S.P.R.L. Ets J. Vervaecke), [1969] ECR 295, para. 5-7.
- ECJ 25 November 1971, Case 22-71 (Béguelin Import Co. v. S.A.G.L. Import Export), [1971] ECR 949, para. 17, 29.
- ECJ 14 July 1972, Case 48/69 (Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v. Commission of the European Communities), [1972] ECR 619, para. 64.
- ECJ 21 February 1973, Case 6-72 (Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v. Commission of the European Communities), [1973] ECR 215, para. 25-27.
- ECJ 26 November 1975, Case 73-74 (Groupement des fabricants de papiers peints de Belgique et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1975] ECR 1491, para. 32.
- ECJ 16 December 1975, joined cases 40 to 48, 50, 54 to 56, 111, 113 and 114-73 (Coöperatieve Vereniging "Suiker Unie" UA et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1975] ECR 1663, para. 174.
- ECJ 25 October 1977, Case 26-76 (Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG v. Commission of the European Communities), [1977] ECR 1875, para. 20, 47.
- ECJ 14 February 1978, Case 27/76 (United Brands Company and United Brands Continental BV v. Commission of the European Communities), [1978] ECR 207, para. 10, 38, 108, 113-117, 168, 189-190, 208, 236.
- ECJ 13 February 1979, Case 85/76 (Hoffman-La Roche & Co. AG v. Commission of the European Communities), [1979] ECR 461, para. 41, 57-58, 91.
- ECJ 20 February 1979, Case C-120/78 (Rewe Zentrale v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein), [1979] ECR 649.
- ECJ 12 July 1979, joined cases 32/78, 36/78 to 82/78 (BMW Belgium SA et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1979] ECR 2435, para. 36.
- ECJ 29 October 1980, joined cases 209 to 215 and 218/78 (Heintz van Landewyck SARL et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1980] ECR 3125, para. 88, 183, 185.
- ECJ 8 June 1982, Case 258/78 (L.C. Nungesser KG and Kurt Eisele v. Commission of the European Communities), [1982] ECR 2015.
- ECJ 9 November 1983, Case 322/81 (NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v. Commission of the European Communities), [1983] ECR 3461, para. 57.
- ECJ 17 January 1984, joined cases 43/82 and 63/82 (Vereniging ter Bevordering van het Vlaamse Boekwezen, VBVB, and Vereniging ter Bevordering van de Belangen des Boekhandels, VBBB, v. Commission of the European Communities), [1984] ECR 19, para. 52.
- ECJ 28 March 1984, joined cases 29 and 30/83 (Compagnie Royale Asturienne des Mines SA and Rheinzink GmbH v. Commission of the European Communities), [1984] ECR 1979, para. 26.
- ECJ 30 January 1985, Case 123/83 (Bureau national interprofessionnel du cognac v. Guy Clair), [1985] ECR 391, para. 22.
- ECJ 11 July 1985, Case 42/84 (Remia BV et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [1985] ECR 2566, para. 22.
- ECJ 3 October 1985, Case 311/84 (Centre belge d'études de marché - Télémarketing (CBEM) v. SA Compagnie luxembourgeoise de télédiffusion (CLT) and Information publicité Benelux (IPB), [1985] ECR 3261, para. 27.
- ECJ 28 January 1986, Case 161/84 (Pronuptia de Paris GmbH v. Pronuptia de Paris Irmgard Schillgallis), [1986] ECR 353.
- ECJ 22 October 1986, Case 75/84 (Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG v. Commission of the European Communities), [1986] ECR 3021, para. 85-86.
- ECJ 20 May 1987, Case 272/85 (Association nationale des travailleurs indépendants de la batellerie (ANTIB) v. Commission of the European Communities), [1987] ECR 2201, para. 25, 27-38.
- ECJ 16 June 1987, Case 118/85 (Commission of the European Communities v. Italian Republic), [1987] ECR 2599, para. 7.
- ECJ 23 April 1991, Case C-41/90 (Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron GmbH), [1991] ECR I-1979, para. 21.
- ECJ 3 July 1991, Case C-62/86 (AKZO Chemie BV v. Commission of the European Communities), [1991] ECR I-3359, para. 60.
- ECJ 31 March 1993, joined cases C-89/85, C-104/85, C-114/85, C-116/85, C-117/85, C-125/85, C-126/85, C-127/85, C-128/85 and C-129/85 (Ahlström Osakeyhtiö et al v. Commission), [1993] ECR I-01307.
- ECJ 27 April 1994, Case C-393/92 (Municipality of Almelo et al v. NV Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij), [1994] ECR I-1477, para. 42.
- ECJ 15 December 1994, Case C-250/92 (Gøttrup-Klim Grovvareforening et al v. Dansk Landbrugs Grovvareselskab AmbA (DLG)), [1994] ECR I-5641, para. 14, 35.
- ECJ 6 April 1995, joined cases C-241/91P and C-242/91P (Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) and Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) v. Commission of the European Communities), [1995] ECR I-00743, para. 56-57.
- ECJ 16 November 1995, Case C-244/94 (Federation Française des Sociétés d'Assurance, Société Paternelle Vie, Union des Assurances de Paris-Vie, Caisse d'Assurance et de Prévoyance Mutuelle des Agriculteurs and Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche), [1995] ECR I-4013, para. 14.
- ECJ 12 December 1995, Case C-399/93 (H. G. Oude Luttikhuis et al v. Verenigde Coöperatieve Melkindustrie Coberco BA), [1995] ECR I-4515, para. 3.
- ECJ 14 November 1996, Case C- 333/94 P (Tetra Pak International SA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1996] ECR I-5951, para. 27, 31.
- ECJ 18 March 1997, Case C-343/95 (Cali e Figli), [1997] ECR I-1547, para. 22-23.
- ECJ 17 July 1997, Case C-219/95P (Ferriere Nord SpA v. Commission of the European Communities), [1997] ECR I-04411, para. 19.
- ECJ 11 December 1997, Case C-55/96 (Job Centre coop. arl.), [1997] ECR I-7119, para. 21.
- ECJ 28 May 1998, C-7/95P John Deere Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities), [1998] ECR I-311, para. 77.
- ECJ 18 June 1998, Case C-35/96 (Commission of the European Communities v. Italian Republic), [1998] ECR I-3851, para. 36.
- ECJ 26 November 1998, Case C-7/97 (Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG v. Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG, Mediaprint Zeitungsvertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Mediaprint Anzeigengesellschaft mbH & Co. KG), [1998] ECR I-07791, para. 24, 37, 41, 43.
- ECJ 21 January 1999, Case C-216/96 (Carlo Bagnasco et al v. Banca Popolare di Novara soc. coop. arl. (BNP) et al), [1999] ECR I-135, para. 48.
- ECJ 1 June 1999, Case 126/97 (Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v. Benetton International NV), [1999] ECR I-3055, para 37.
- ECJ 8 July 1999, Case C-49/92P (Commission of the European Communities v. Anic Partecipazioni SpA) [1999] ECR I-4125, para. 112, 132, 133.
- ECJ 8 July 1999, case C-199/92P (Hüls AG v. Commisson of the European Communities), [1999] ECR I-4287, para. 163-166.
- ECJ 16 March 2000, joined cases C-395/96P, C-396/96P (Compagnie maritime belge transports SA et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2000] ECR I-1365, para. 45, 130.
- ECJ 19 February 2002, Case C-309/99 (J. C. J. Wouters, J. W. Savelbergh and Price Waterhouse Belastingadviseurs BV v. Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, intervener: Raad van de Balies van de Europese Gemeenschap), [2002] ECR I-1577, para. 46, 97, 110.
- ECJ 2 October 2003, Case C-194/99P (Thyssen Stahl AG v. Commission of the European Communities), [2003] ECR I-10821, para. 59, 60, 62-63, 84.
- ECJ 6 January 2004, joined cases C-2/01 P and C-3/01P (Bayer v. Commission), [2004] ECR I-23, para. 101-102.
- ECJ 7 January 2004, joined cases C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P and C-219/00 P, (Aalborg Portland et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2004] ECR I-123, para. 78, 81.
- ECJ 19 January 2004, Case C-453/00 (Kühne & Heitz NV v. Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren), [2004] ECR I-837, para. 20.
- ECJ 29 April 2004, Case C-418/01 (IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG v. NDC Health GmbH & Co. KGIMS), [2004] ECR I-05039, para. 37-38, 46-47.
- ECJ 28 June 2005, joined cases C-189, 202, 205-208 and 213/02P (Dansk Rørindustri A/S et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2005] ECR I-5425, para. 145.
- ECJ 11 July 2006, Case C-205/03P (Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) v. Commission of the European Communities, [2006] ECR I-6295, para. 25.
- ECJ 18 July 2006, Case C-519/04P (David Meca-Medina and Igor Majcen v. Commission of the European Communities), [2006] ECR I-6991, para. 42, 45.
- ECJ 21 September 2006, Case C-167/04P (JCB Service v. Commission of the European Communities), [2006] ECR I-8935, para. 162-163.
- ECJ 23 November 2006, Case C-238/05 (Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL and Administración del Estado v. Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc)), [2006] ECR I-11125, para. 7, 46-48, 58, 70.
- ECJ 25 January 2007, Case C-407/04P (Dalmine SpA v. Commission of the European Communities), [2007] ECR I‑829, para. 90.
- ECJ 15 March 2007, Case C-95/04P (British Airways plc v. Commission of the European Communities), [2007] ECR I-2331, para. 77.
- ECJ 10 July 2008, Case C-413/06P (Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v. Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala)), [2008] ECR I-4951, para. 124.
- ECJ 16 September 2008, joined cases C-468/06 to C-478/06 (ot. Lélos kai Sia EE et al v. GlaxoSmithKline AEVE Farmakeftikon Proionton, formerly Glaxowellcome AEVE), [2008] ECR I-7139, para. 50.
- ECJ 20 November 2008, Case C-209/07 (Competition Authority v. Beef Industry Development Society Ltd and Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd.), [2008] ECR I-8637, para. 21.
- ECJ 4 June 2009, Case C-8/08 (T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v. Raad van Bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit), [2009] ECR I-4529, para. 27, 36.
- ECJ 10 September 2009, Case C‑97/08P (Akzo Nobel NV et al v. Commission of the European Communities), [2009] I-08237, para. 54.
- ECJ 6 October 2009, joined cases C-501/06P (GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v. Commission of the European Communities), C-513/06P (and Commission of the European Communities v. GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited), C-515/06P (European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) v. Commission of the European Communities), and C-519/06P (Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar) v. Commission of the European Communities), [2009] ECR I-09291, para. 7.
- ECJ 23 March 2010, joined cases C-236/08 to C-238/08 (Google Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA et al.), [2010] ECR I-02417, para. 3.
- ECJ 13 December 2012, Case C-226/11 (Expedia Inc. v. Autorité de la concurrence et al), [2012] ECR I-795, para. 16-17, 35-37.
- ECJ 7 February 2013, Case C-68/12 (Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky v. Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s), ECLI:EU:C:2013:71, para. 17.
- ECJ 28 February 2013, Case C-1/12 (Ordem dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas v. Autoridade da Concorrência), [2013] 4 CMLR 20, para. 99.
- ECJ 11 September 2014, Case C‑382/12P (MasterCard Inc. et al v. European Commission), [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2201, para. 242.
- ECJ 6 October 2015, Case C‑23/14 (Post Danmark A/S v. Konkurrencerådet), [2015] 651, p. 70-73.
- Article 281 of the Mainland CPL.
- The Companies Act 2006 (to access: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf).
- The Human Rights Act 1988 (to access: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents).
- The Arbitration Act 1996 of 17 June 1996.
- The Companies Act (to access: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/mesicic3_jam_companies.pdf).
- The Companies Act of 1989 (to access: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/contents).
- The Arbitration Act 1996 (to access: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/contents).
- Chapter 8 of the Consolidated Laws of the State of New York of 1909 (Civil Practice Law & Rules) (to access: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP).
- Zivilprozessordnung (to access: https://dejure.org/gesetze/ZPO).
- Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen of 2017 (to access: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gwb/BJNR252110998.html).
- Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb of 2019 (to access: https://dejure.org/gesetze/UWG).
- United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (to access: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/New-York-Convention-E.pdf).
- New York Consolidated Laws, Civil Practice Law and Rules of 1962 (to access: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP).
- UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration of 1985 (with amendments adopted in 2006) (to access: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf).
- United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (to access: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/New-York-Convention-E.pdf).
- Federal Arbitration Act of 1947 (to access: https://sccinstitute.com/media/37104/the-federal-arbitration-act-usa.pdf).
- Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 (to access: https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/761131/download).
- The Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community of 25 March 1957.
- Council Regulation No 17/62, First Regulation Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU], [OJ 1962, No 87 28].
- Council Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 of the Council of 20 December 1971 on application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty [now Article 101(3) TFEU] to categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices, [OJ 1971, No. L 285].
- Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law of 9 December 1997 [OJ 1997, No. C 372/5].
- Notice on the application of the competition rules to access agreements in the telecommunications sector of 22 August 1998 [OJ 1998, No. C265/02].
- Notice pursuant to Article 19(3) of Council Regulation No 17 (Î) of 9 January 1999 concerning Case No IV/F-1/36.160 (International Dental Exhibition).
- Commission, “White Paper on Modernisation of the Rules implementing Article 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU]” of 28 April 1999, [OJ 1999, No. C 132/01].
- Notice published pursuant to Article 19(3) of Council Regulation No 17 of 13 June 2001 concerning Case No COMP/35.163 (Notification of FIA Regulations), Case No COMP/36.638 (Notification by FIA/FOA of agreements relating to the FIA Formula One World Championship), and Case No COMP/36.776 (GTR/FIA), sect. 6.
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [now Article 101 and 102 TFEU] [OJ 2003, No L 001].
- Commission Recommendation concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises or any future recommendation replacing it of 20 May 2003, [OJ 2003, No. L 124].
- The Commission – Notice – Guidelines on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty [now Article 101 (3) TFEU] of 27 April 2004, [OJ 2004, No. C 101/97], para. 20.
- Commission Notice — Guidelines on the effect on trade concept contained in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [now Articles 101 and 102 TFEU] of 27 April 2004, [OJ 2004, No. C 101/07].
- Communication from the Commission — Guidance on the Commission's enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU] to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings of 24 February 2009, [OJ 2009, No. C 45].
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development, [OJ 2010, No. L 335/36].
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements, [OJ 2010, No. L 335/43].
- Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements of 14 January 2011, [OJ 2011, No. C 11/01].
- Commission Notice on Agreements of Minor Importance which do not Appreciably Restrict Competition under Article 101(1) TFEU (de minimis) of 30 August 2014 [OJ 2014, No. C 291/1].
- European Commission, IXth Report on Competition Policy, para. 22.
- National British Cattle and Sheep Breeders’ Association, Twenty-second Report on Competition Policy 1992, Annex III, p. 416.
- M. Monti, EC Commissioner for Competition, “The Future for Competition Policy in the European Union”, Speech, 9 July 2001, p.2 (europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-01-340_en.pdf);
- N. Kroes, EC Commissioner for Competition, “European Competition Policy – Delivering Better Markets and Better Choices”, Speech, 15 September 2005, p. 2 (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-512_en.htm).
- N. Kroes, EC Commissioner for Competition, “Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82”, Speech, 23 September 2005, p. 5 (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-537_en.htm?locale=en).
- E. Paulis, Deputy Director for the Directorate-General for Competition, “The Burden of Proof in Article 82 cases”, Speech, 6 September 2006, p. 5 (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2006_014_en.pdf).
- N. Kroes, EC Commissioner for Competition, “Exclusionary abuses of dominance - the European Commission’s enforcement priorities”, Speech, 25 September 2008, p. 4 (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-08-457_en.htm?locale=en).
- The Site Terms and Conditions of Use (to access: https://www.nyddc.com/terms--conditions.html).
- DDC Bylaws (1999) (not publicly available).
- The World Federation of Diamond Bourses By-laws and Inner Rules (2016).
- The Articles of Association of the International Cotton Association (to access: https://www.ica-ltd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Articles_Nov2018.pdf).
- Bylaws and Rules of the International Cotton Association Limited of 2018 (to access: https://www.ica-ltd.org/media/layout/documents/rulebooks/2018-11-rulebook-en.pdf).
- The General Rules and Regulations Applicable to All Members of 2017 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Membership/General_Rules_and_RegulationsApplicable_to_All_Members_2017.pdf).
- The General Rules and Regulations Applicable to all Members of 2017 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Membership/General_Rules_and_Regulations_Applicable_to_All_Members_2017.pdf).
- The Arbitration Rules No. 125 of 2018 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2018/125_2018.pdf).
- Gafta Rules - Mediation Rules & Agreement of 2014 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2014/128_2014.pdf).
- Simple Disputes Arbitration Rules No. 126 of 2010 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2010/126.pdf).
- Arbitration Rules No.127 For use with Charter Parties or Other Forms of Maritime Transport of 2014 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2014/127_2014.pdf).
- Rules and Code of Conduct for Qualified Arbitrators & Qualified Mediators (to access: https://www.gafta.com/Rules-and-Code-of-Conduct-for-Qualified-Arbitrators-Qualified-Mediators).
- Guidelines for GAFTA Appointment of Arbitrators (to access: https://www.gafta.com/Guidelines-for-Gafta-Appointment-of-Arbitrators).
- Mediation Rules No. 128 of 2012 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2012/128.pdf).
- The Contract for the Delivery of Goods Central and Eastern Europe in Bulk or Bags No. 49 of 2018 (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2018/49_2018.pdf).
- The FCC Articles of Association (2017) (to access: https://www.cocoafederation.com/dashboard/documents/download/371).
- The FCC Arbitration and Appeal Rules of 2017 (to access: https://www.cocoafederation.com/dashboard/documents/freecontent/rules/arbitration-and-appeal/arbitration-appeal-rules/ENG).
- The Application Procedure to Join the FCC Arbitration and Appeal Panel of 2017 (to access: https://www.cocoafederation.com/dashboard/documents/download/382).
- Dispute Resolution Service: A Guide to FCC Arbitration of 2015 (to access: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjjrYja14HhAhWCyqQKHVmID60QFjABegQICRAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cocoafederation.com%2Fdashboard%2Fdocuments%2Fdownload%2F211&usg=AOvVaw38QHl1n8pHknBUKlz_6uof).
- The London Metal Exchange Rules and Regulations of 2019 (to access: https://www.lme.com/LME-Clear/Rules-and-regulations).
- The LME Articles of Association of 2013 (to access: https://www.lme.com/-/media/Files/LME-Clear/Governance/Approved-LMEC-Articles-of-Association.pdf?la=en-GB).
- The LME Rulebook of 2019 (to access: https://www.lme.com/-/media/Files/Regulation/Rulebook/Full-Rulebook/Rulebook-as-of-January-2019.pdf?la=en-GB).
- FOSFA Rules and Regulations of 2018 (to access: https://www.fosfa.org/about-us/rules-and-regulations/).
- FOSFA Rules of Arbitration and Appeal of 2018 (to access: https://www.fosfa.org/document-library/rules-of-arbitration-and-appeal-april-2018/).
- The FOSFA Rules of Brokerage Commission and Interest (2018) (to access: https://www.fosfa.org/document-library/rules-for-brokerage-commissions-and-interest-april-2018/). https://www.fosfa.org/arbitration/directory-of-fosfa-arbitrators/).
- FOSFA Code of Practice for Arbitrators of 2018 (to access: https://www.fosfa.org/content/uploads/2018/03/Code-of-Practice-for-Arbitrators-and-Time-Sheet-April-2018.pdf).
- FOSFA Guide to Arbitrations and Appeals of 2018 (to access: https://www.fosfa.org/content/uploads/2018/03/FOSFA-Guide-to-Arbitrations-and-Appeals-April-2018.pdf).
- GAFTA Contract No. 1 – General Contract for Shipment of Feeding Stuffs in Bags Tale Quale – CIF/CIFFO/C&F/C&FFO Terms of 2018. (to access: https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2018/1_2018.pdf).
- ICA, ICA membership directory, incorporating annual review.
- The London Metal Exchange, “A Guide to the LME”, The London Metal Exchange 2013.
- The London Metal Exchange, “A Guide to Trading LME”, The London Metal Exchange 2016.
- http://www.ica-ltd.org/.
- http://www.nyddc.com/.
- http://www.gafta.com/.
- http://www.cocoafederation.com/.
- https://www.lme.com/.
- http://www.fosfa.org/.
- http://www.cicca.info/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/about-ica/our-board/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/about-ica/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/safe-trading/member-search/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/arbitration/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/advanced-level-arbitrator-training/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/basic-level-arbitrator-training/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/safe-trading/loua-part-one/.
- https://www.nyddc.com/contact-us.html.
- https://www.diamondintelligence.com/magazine/magazine.aspx?id=9862.
- https://www.nyddc.com/terms--conditions.html.
- https://www.nyddc.com/membership.html.
- https://www.nyddc.com/arbitration.
- https://www.wfdb.com/diamond-dealers-club.
- https://www.nyddc.com/officers.html.
- https://www.nyddc.com/membership.html.
- https://www.nyddc.com/membership.html.
- http://www.nyddc.com/uploads/2/3/7/3/23730718/ddc_membership_application.pdf.
- https://www.wfdb.com/.
- https://www.wfdb.com/wfdb-bourses.
- https://www.nytimes.com/1979/05/06/archives/the-citys-most-exclusive-club.html.
- https://www.diamonds.net/News/NewsItem.aspx?ArticleID=49902&ArticleTitle=New+York+Adapting+to+Changing+Diamond+Market.
- https://www.gafta.com/about.
- https://www.gafta.com/Membership.
- https://www.gafta.com/Council.
- https://www.gafta.com/Staff/75508. https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Arbitration/Gafta_Qualified_Arbitrator_Status_201.pdf.
- https://www.gafta.com/Gafta-Professional-Development-GPD.
- https://www.gafta.com/Distance-Learning-Programme.
- https://www.gafta.com/Trade-Diploma.
- https://www.gafta.com/Gafta-Qualified-Arbitrators-Annual-Continuing-Professional-Development-GPD-Policy.
- https://www.gafta.com/about.
- https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Arbitration/Defaulters/Defaulters_on_Gafta_Awards_of_Arbitration_2011-present.pdf.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/fcc/members.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/membership/categories-of-membership.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/services/arbitration/arbitration.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/dashboard/documents/download/211.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/services/arbitration/defaulters.
- https://www.lme.com/en-GB/Trading/Trading-venues/Ring#tabIndex=0.
- https://www.lme.com/en-GB/Trading/Systems/LMEselect#tabIndex=0.
- https://www.lme.com/en-GB/Trading/Access-the-market/Membership-categories#tabIndex=0.
- https://www.lme.com/en-GB/About/Regulation/Arbitration#tabIndex=0.
- https://www.lme.com/About/Regulation/Arbitration/Arbitration-panel.
- https://www.lme.com/About/Regulation/Arbitration#tabIndex=1).
- https://uk.globaldatabase.com/company/federation-of-oils-seeds-and-fats-associations-limited.
- http://www.datalog.co.uk/browse/detail.php/CompanyNumber/00926329/CompanyName/FEDERATION+OF+OILS+SEEDS+AND+FATS+ASSOCIATIONS+LIMITED.
- https://www.fosfa.org/about-us/officers-of-the-federation/.
- https://www.fosfa.org/membership/categories-of-membership/.
- https://www.fosfa.org/document-library/rules-for-small-claims-single-tier-april-2018/.
- https://www.fosfa.org/arbitration/posted-companies/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/media/layout/documents/publications/lca_econtract.pdf.
- https://www.gafta.com/write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2018/1_2018.pdf.
- https://www.cocoafederation.com/dashboard/documents/freecontent/rules/cocoa-beans/contract-rules-for-cocoa-beans/ENG.
- https://www.lme.com/-/media/Files/Metals/Precious-Metals/LMEprecious/LMEprecious-Contract-Specifications.pdf.
- https://www.lme.com/en-GB/About/Regulation/Arbitration#tabIndex=2.
- http://www.rheinische-warenboerse.de/upload/Contract_No_26_2822.pdf.
- https://www.wfdb.com/media-news-press/news-headlines/370-ddc-announces-new-initiative-to-safeguard-diamond-transactions.
- www2.ef.jcu.cz/~sulista/pages/kdfp/BUEN1-1.pdf.
- https://thebusinessprofessor.com/knowledge-base/the-sherman-act-antitrust-law/.
- https://www.ica-ltd.org/safe-trading/loua-part-one/.
- http://www.africotton.org/aca/en/.
- http://english.china-cotton.org/.
- http://acsa-cotton.org/).
- http://www.cicca.info/member_associations.php.
- http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/maritime/exhibitions/cotton/traders/trading-rules.aspx.
- https://www.nyddc.com/about-the-ddc.html.
- http://articles.latimes.com/1985-08-18/business/fi-1708_1_diamond-prices.
- http://www.heritagediamonds.net/antwerp-diamond-bourse/.
- https://www.auction-house.ru/en/news_analytics/rynok-almazov-mira/.
- https://www.icco.org/about-cocoa/trading-a-shipping.html.
- https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/brief-united-states-and-federal-trade-commission-amici-curiae-supporting-0.
- https://www.nyddc.com/ddc-news--events/rapaport-qa-with-david-lasher-managing-director-of-the-new-york-diamond-dealers-club.
- https://www.nyddc.com/ddc-news—events.
- Decision n° 98-D-73 of 25 November 1998 on a referral and a request for interim measures submitted by the National Employers' Union of dental technicians.
- Decision N°05-D-33 of 27 June 2005 on practices implemented by Ilec., p. 6.
- Danish Competition Council of 30 January 2008, (Lokale Pengeinstitutter (the Association of Local Banks, Savings Banks and Cooperative Banks in Denmark; the Association) Pharmaceutische Handelsconventie’ (PHC), Eighth Report on Competition Policy 1978, p. 73.