Turning Point in Data Protection Law

doi:10.5771/9783748921561

Turning Point in Data Protection Law

Two years GDPR on DPOblog.eu

1. Edition 2020

No access

doi.org/10.5771/9783748921561
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-6909-4
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2156-1
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Buy in store

Zusammenfassung

„Turning Point in Data Protection Law“ enthält Beiträge aus den ersten beiden Jahren der DS-GVO des DPOblog.eu. Die Themen erstrecken sich von den neuen Grundlagen der DS-GVO über die aktuellen Entscheidungen des EuGH bis zu den ersten Rechtsverfahren von Max Schrems.

Abstract

Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
1–10 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1–10
11–12 Turning point Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 11–12
- 25 April 2018
13–16 How to ‘provide’ information (Art. 12 GDPR)? European Court of Justice requires active behavior Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 13–16
- 25 April 2018
17–20 The end of an “old“ consent? Consent faces legal action by Max Schrems and consumer agencies Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 17–20
- 07 May 2018
21–24 ‘Do not track’ without consent – as quoted by German regulators Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 21–24
- 18 May 2018
  - 1. Facts and legal background
  - 2. The statement of the German DPAs with pro and contra
25–30 Accountability – the gravity centre of GDPR Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 25–30
- 26 May 2018
31–38 The potential outcome of Max Schrems first legal actions against Facebook and Google Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 31–38
- 06 June 2018
39–44 Fan pages jointly liable with Facebook – landmark of ECJ Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 39–44
- 11 June 2018
45–50 Ban of Facebook Customs Audience – decision of German DPA upheld Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 45–50
- 25 June 2018
  - 1. Facts and procedure
  - 2. Legal arguments of the Administrative court
- d. Are the arguments of the Administrative court convincing?
  - 3. Will the final decision be valid under GDPR?
51–54 ‘Data processing on behalf’ within a group Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 51–54
- 18 August 2018
55–58 Google is tracking location of users without consent Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 55–58
- 19 August 2018
  - 1. Legal analysis
  - 2. What is the reaction of the data protection watchdog?
59–62 IT maintenance is ‘Data processing on behalf’ according to German DPAs Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 59–62
- 1 Octobre 2018
63–66 ECHR: Mass surveillance by British secret service violated European Convention on Human Rights Peter Schaar Peter Schaar 63–66
- 08 Octobre 2018
  - 1. Substance of the decision
  - 2. Assessment
67–70 Cookies consent Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 67–70
- 25 Octobre 2018
71–74 Facebook-hack: stress test for Irish DPC Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 71–74
- 17 November 2018
75–80 Microsoft is driving it´s customers into non-compliance Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 75–80
- 20 January 2019
81–88 Joint Controllership within a group of entities Lukas Lezzi, Jutta Sonja Oberlin Lukas Lezzi, Jutta Sonja Oberlin 81–88
- 1 February 2019
89–92 The “one for all lawsuit” Katarina Barley Katarina Barley 89–92
- 6 February 2019
93–96 In the face – of Facebook Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 93–96
- 8 February 2019
97–100 There Shall be Order! A Proposal for More Structured Normativity on the Internet Matthias C. Kettemann Matthias C. Kettemann 97–100
- 17 March 2019
101–104 Consent to privacy policy – 'invalid' Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 101–104
- 30 March 2019
105–108 “Enforcing the law in the digital era – a key task for Europe”1 Winfried Bausback Winfried Bausback 105–108
- 13 April 2019
109–114 Data breach: 72 hours period extended on weekend? Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 109–114
- 31 May 2019
115–120 Liability of private parties for data protection breaches Tobias Jaquemain Tobias Jaquemain 115–120
- 27 June 2019
121–126 Struggling with users’ consent: Economic approach to solve the issue of coupling Alexander Golland Alexander Golland 121–126
- 28 July 2019
127–132 “Fashion ID“: ECJ opens door for class action against Facebook Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 127–132
- 10 August 2019
133–136 The DPO and the messenger of bad news Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 133–136
- 21 September 2019
137–140 Planet 49 (ECJ): most consent for cookies invalid Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 137–140
- 1 Octobre 2019
141–144 The “Whitelist” and its Value during a Data Protection Impact Assessment Iheanyi Samuel Nwankwo Iheanyi Samuel Nwankwo 141–144
- 25 October 2019
145–150 Data Protection in Japan Toshihiro Wada Toshihiro Wada 145–150
- 16 November 2019
151–156 Google Analytics: Injunctive relief, information requests and damages Peter Hense Peter Hense 151–156
- 8 December 2019
157–162 Irish DPC: liability for failure to act against Facebook Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 157–162
- 12 January 2020
  - 1. Liability pursuant to European public liability law
- a) Infringement of rights of individuals
- b) The breach must be sufficiently serious
- c) Direct causal link between the breach and the damage
- d) Application of European public liability law
- e) Limitation of liability
  - 2. Assessment
163–166 Internal Audit, DPO and the adjustment of Three-Lines-of-Defense-Modell Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 163–166
- 29 February 2020
167–170 Junk mail from a dating portal (decision of Austrian DPA) Andreas Rohner, Gerald Trieb Andreas Rohner, Gerald Trieb 167–170
- 19 March 2020
171–174 GDPR – not fit for corona? Thomas Kahler Thomas Kahler 171–174
- 25 April 2020
175–178 Video surveillance: The supervisory authorities’ view and recent case law Alexander Golland, Jan-Peter Ohrtmann Alexander Golland, Jan-Peter Ohrtmann 175–178
- 25 May 2020
179–186 Data: The key role in fighting against the Coronavirus pandemic – Opportunities and risks of the contact tracing Apps Jutta Sonja Oberlin Jutta Sonja Oberlin 179–186
- 1 June 2020
187–194 Author directory 187–194

Durchsuchen Sie das Werk

Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein