Abstract
Debate over the meaning and purpose of the grand experiment called the United States has existed since its inception. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison worked closely together to achieve the ratification of the Constitution, which both considered essential for the survival of the United States. However, within just a few years of the Constitution’s ratification, they became bitter political enemies as the pair disagreed about what the United States should be like under the new Constitution, specifically how to interpret the Constitution they both worked to create and support.
Defining the Republic: Early Conflicts over the Constitution documents, through presentation of their own words, that these two essential early Americans simply had different expectations all along. Expectations that went unexamined during the frenetic times in which the Constitution was written, debated, and ratified.
It is to their differences that Americans today can look in order to better understand the history of the United States, as well as current debates over politics and life in general in the country Hamilton and Madison helped to create.
Schlagworte
American history Constitutional interpretation history of constitution james madison founding fathers alexander hamilton- i–vi Preface i–vi
- 1–6 Introduction 1–6
- 103–106 Conclusion 103–106
- 107–110 Bibliography 107–110
- 111–114 Index 111–114
- 115–116 About the Author 115–116